Options for combining different ranks and different primatiality of men. Manifestations of primality. Community features

RANK- this is the psychological level that a man occupies in the system of relations with other people

Just take the following for granted. After many years of searching, I can say that of all the classifications of men, this is the most natural and correct. The rest is garbage.

Three kinds of men

Want to see an example of a high-ranking man? Watch the movie " Thief" 1997. Vladimir Mashkov brilliantly and in all its beauty conveyed the features of a strong man.

High-ranking man is everywhere. He can live in your porch, house or on your street. Such a man can be your colleague at work. To be high-ranking, he does not have to be famous or very rich. Do not confuse social status and psychological rank!

It is these men who have an animal love for life! And women. Women themselves feel this and are drawn to such men. And to make it even clearer what exactly makes his rank high, let's analyze the thinking and behavior of such a man on the shelves. Let me remind you once again that rank is the level that a man occupies in relationships with other people. And here's what makes his rank high:

He may lose all his possessions, his family or business may fall apart! BUT! He will always build new house or create new family. However, it should be clear: he may not have a home in his whole life, he may not have a family, but his character will remain just as strong! A man with a high rank does not change!

There are few such men. Not enough for all women. According to my observations - 2 out of 10. Therefore, women sometimes marry more convenient and comfortable men - middle-ranking ones. Such men can achieve a lot if they stop delving into themselves.

2. Middle-ranking man

Let the film help in understanding this image. The geographer drank away the globe". Konstantin Khabensky skillfully showed the type of a middle-ranking man. This role was natural for him, because he belongs to this category of men.

According to my observations - 5 out of 10 are middle-ranking men. The danger and at the same time the advantage of such a status is that this man can potentially become high-ranking if he can solve problems with and eliminate the desire to be convenient for women. By the way, this is what my "" is dedicated to, where we with men at weekly meetings solve these problems in their lives.

But on the other hand, such a man is always afraid to slide down, to become weak.

Middle-ranking man always can be identified by the chameleon effect: with the weak, he behaves like a strong one. And next to the strong, he behaves like a subordinate.

The mid-ranker is in a constant struggle with himself. And therefore for him the decisive role is played by what kind of woman he meets: one can break him, the other will help him become king. And next to him is the queen. So he toils, in search of himself, his woman and the meaning of his life.

Men with an average rank - change!

But such a man will always need either the support of the woman with whom he will be in union. Or in a more experienced comrade, a strong man.

These are the men who go to training all the time. personal growth or some other growth: Sparta, Goal, leadership programs, pickups, etc. Such men try hard to copy behavior and even thinking. strong men. And this can be misleading for women, thinking that he is strong.

Their life is a search for themselves. And, unfortunately, if other men do not help them, then this search can last a lifetime, until death.

A woman with such a man can be happy and unhappy at the same time. Her future with him is unpredictable. Because he is unpredictable.

3. Low-ranking man

An example from a famous movie. In this case - " Love affair at work". Andrei Myagkov managed to show the image of a low-ranking man.

You must understand that the low-ranking man is everywhere. He can live in your porch, house or on your street. Such a man can be your colleague at work. He can be your husband, brother, father. And if you are a man - then maybe it's you?

At the same time, he may well be a famous and wealthy person if he has some kind of creative talent. But such a man does not know how to be an organizer. Therefore, someone else is in charge of the money in his life.

It is these men who have an animal fear of ... life. And women! And the women themselves feel it and are drawn to them. Yes, don't be surprised. To be friends! It is with low-ranking men that women can have friendship! This is the answer to the age-old question “is friendship possible between M and F?” - Yes. And to make it even clearer what exactly makes his rank low, let's analyze the thinking and behavior of such a man on the shelves.

Low rank man on his own does not change!

Such men lack the most important thing - desire! The desire for life, the desire for development, the desire for love, the desire for struggle, the desire for achievement, the desire to be a master. I don’t work with such people, and if someone asks me to help a low-ranking man, I immediately say that this is a dead number. These people don't change. I once wrote an article about this, which became popular on the Internet.

Low-ranking people cannot be motivated. They don't make decisions. And any attempts to teach such a man to make choices and be responsible for his life are perceived by him as violence against his personality.

Enough of these men. According to my observations - 3 out of 10. They have their own consumer - as a rule, these are women who have problems in relations with their mother. What is the connection - to explain for a long time. But the connection is direct. Such women choose low-ranking men and then destroy them, wash them into powder. They drive them under the heel, weave ropes out of them, and because of impotence, they begin to drink too much. And if children appear in this family, then they become a continuation of their parents: an unfortunate strong daughter and an unfortunate weak son.

How do women intuitively check a man's rank?

With the help of accusations, manipulations, provocations, claims. If a man begins to make excuses - low-ranking. If he begins to rationally lay out everything on the shelves, negotiate with her - middle-ranking. If he jokes, does not attach importance, or it does not shake him - high-ranking. Simply put - if she can artificially provoke him, piss him off - then he is not strong enough for her. This is an indication of his weakness in front of her.

Woman like it(I'm talking about normal women) when she can't manipulate a man. She likes it when she can't subdue him. And even more like it when he gently subdues her. Not violently. This should happen naturally.

Rita look ... this video .. you will find out interesting

Margo Rita, because experiences lead to one's own truth and experience. If there are no experiences, a person will be weak before life. Like a flower in a greenhouse. A flower that has survived both cold and heat, drought and heavy rains with lightning and even hail. It is very viable, strong and even has a special smell. Greenhouse flowers often do not smell. Because few people pollinate them. A wild flower, he communicates with many. And dragonflies and flies and bumblebees and bees, wasps and even grasshoppers. And how many bugs and spiders, not counting butterflies. Therefore, a wild flower is beautiful from any side. (IMHO) Both externally and internally healing. He is spiritually filled. If I may say so. The truth is, I didn't listen. What is Sviyash broadcasting in the video.

And this means that, contrary to our standard ideas, almost half of men are focused on long-term relationships, do not accept coquetry, and generally tend to behave differently than we expect. (copy)

Anyut, but the person is to blame for driving himself into these endless experiences, isn't it? I know people who literally went through "HELL" (I'll put it in quotation marks), so that it would be clear what kind of "horrors" he went through. I also went through exorbitant fears, I seem to be mentally healthy ...

An important note: a highly primative person can be a doctor of science, an academician, and a low primative person can be a complete ignoramus. However, Alexander Sviyash nevertheless makes a reservation: among low-primative people, there are still very few frankly stupid people ...

Highly primative people are those whose instincts prevail over reason. The main life motto of such people is “Love everything that moves”. Mass residence of such people is observed, for example, in our friendly Georgia. (Alexander Sviyash emphasizes that the abundance of highly primative people is typical for countries with difficult conditions for survival; prosperous Europe has long been giving birth to predominantly low primative people).

Highly primative people in love are ardent and know how to please their partner. True, highly primative people usually have an abundance of partners ...

Yes .. so Sviyash writes how to get out of this garbage pit .. shows the way ... but it’s impossible to carry anyone in your arms ... But it would be nice ...

If there are no experiences, a person will be weak before life.

If a person lives all the time, then he will die from mental exhaustion ... One thing is experience ... another thing is endless chewing of this experience ... especially if it turned out to be painful ..

How many low primative men are there in the world? There are slightly more highly primative men, in whom instincts prevail over reason, than “wise men”: 55% against 45.

Who are the primates and "wise men" looking for? Primates are ideally looking for a virgin. Women's innocence is an attribute that is very important in a highly primative community and completely meaningless in a "smart" environment. It is very important for a male primate to get a female that no one else has used, in his eyes this is a huge bonus.

Is coquetry a woman's weapon? Yes, if the man is a primate. A low-primative man makes a rational conclusion: “To be flirtatious means to be hypocritical. It is hardly worth expecting openness and sincerity from her, it's time to dump. It’s a pity, of course, she seems to be a good young lady, but ... the soul does not lie. Yes, it is difficult for the low-primative soul of a man to accept the standard female tricks.

Low primative men also want sex. But not with everyone accessible women, but with one chosen one for your mind and heart. Low primative men won't comb stone jungle in search of a lover. They are focused on a calm, open, trusting relationship with a single (well, well - with two!) Women.

The main mistake of women “Women are not used to paying attention to the primativity of a partner and when communicating with a man they like, they use standard marital behavioral strategies. That is, they flirt and create barriers to access their bodies,” writes Alexander Sviyash.

The main characteristic of a low-primative man is the predominance of mind over instinct. They will think a hundred times before doing something.

In almost all attractiveness-building courses, teachers advise choosing the tactic “He is the hunter, and I am the game” as the main seduction strategy. Alas, this strategy is only win-win for highly primative men! Obstacles only inflame such a man and cause a desire to achieve the goal at any cost. The more actively the "game" escapes, the higher the temperature of the blood in the veins of the "hunter".

A reasonable man is unlikely to decide on a serious relationship (read - marriage) without making sure that he is good in bed with this woman. And female innocence for him is an extra problem.

Sexual signs of men with well-developed instincts

Alas, having achieved highly primative male he doesn’t enjoy the victory for very long ... If he managed to get married, he sends his soul mate to the kitchen, and he himself - sorry, "the pipe is calling." If the march of Mendelssohn has not sounded, the primacy disappears ...

Combination options different rank and different primativity of men

From the author: for the first time I brought these characteristics together in a book in 2011. At that time, it was the only summary table of examples of the combination of all ranks and all degrees of male primativity. She then migrated to. Despite the fact that the information has already gone for the fifth year, for some reason this question is still puzzling. I'm posting the spreadsheet.

High-ranking highly primative- a person with ambitions and qualities of a leader. Strong, self-confident, conflict, selfish, successful. Goes on about his instincts, rarely guided by logic and reason, behavior is most often subject to emotions. Furious leaders, unable to suppress their desires. Criminal authority - the head of the gang, as well as famous scandalous and pretentious actors and singers, pop divas, top models - high-ranking highly primative people.

High rank medium primative- a person endowed with everything. Behavior is subject to emotions and instincts (including the instinct of the leader, the hierarchical instinct), but sometimes logic and common sense, laid down by education, prevail and dominate over emotions, which is reflected in behavior. They can be strongly influenced by instincts, can partially suppress them, but at the same time remain leaders. Some of the successful, wealthy entrepreneurs and famous creative people those who avoid scandals are high-ranking average primative men and women.

High rank low primative– a person with high ranking potential, ranking ambitions and abilities. Possesses all or at least all the basic qualities of a leader. He knows his own worth, and this price is high. Self-confident, knows how to achieve his own. Possesses high conflict stability. However, unlike the highly primative, the low primative is well brought up. His instincts (with rare exceptions, for example, excluding the instinct of the leader), emotions are secondary to logic, common sense and education. Despite the many qualities of a leader, they can look like low-ranking ones from the outside due to the fact that they do not give vent to emotions and do not seek to demonstrate their high rank everywhere. Representatives of the most active, most civilized and most successful stratum of society. Aristocrats, famous scientists, some businessmen, top managers, many politicians are high-ranking, low-primative people.

Mid-ranking highly primative- a person with a not too pronounced leader instinct knows his own worth, but does not aspire to the heights. Strongly subject to instinctive influence. Emotions dominate common sense. Usually middle-ranking highly primative men are little-known singers, musicians, artists, poets; in other words, creative people who have achieved some success, but have not taken off to the Olympus of fame.

Middle rank medium primative a person does not pursue high status too much, but does not put up with too low. Behavior is driven by both emotion and logic, depending on the situation. Employees occupying lower management positions or just specialists are middle-ranking average people.

Medium rank low primative- a person who works hard and makes good money, but does not reach for the heights. Often a workaholic. There is conflict resistance, but it is not very significant. Prefers not to get involved in conflicts. If any significant problems arise, it turns off the chosen path. Educated, cultured. Emotions and instincts are suppressed by education. In actions guided by common sense. All good performers, high-performance specialists, junior-level researchers are middle-ranking low-primative people.

Low rank high primative- person holding lower levels social hierarchy, bottom. The instinct of the leader does not possess, the slave of his emotions and instincts, often base. Rude, rude, aggressive. He behaves obsequiously with the strong, mocks and mocks the weak. Due to the high primativity it is conflict, but at the same time it is conflict unstable. Socially negative figure. He is prone to crime, which is what he most often does in life, but he is not able to rise in the criminal hierarchy in any way. Usually, low-ranking, highly primative people are street punks, alcoholics, homeless people, low-caste criminals, cheap prostitutes. In a word, the entire social bottom.

Low rank medium primative- a person who does not pretend to any high position in society. Located at the bottom of the social pyramid. Emotional and subservient to instincts, but not so much as to completely lose control of himself. Most often uncouth, rude, has a low education, does not shine with culture. People without education, who perform non-prestigious work (such as a handyman or a janitor), and who are unable to rise above, are low-ranking, middle-primative people.

Low rank low primatives people have no voice of their own, they are servile, obsequious, afraid of everything. Panically afraid of conflicts, because they are not able to emerge victorious even from the simplest situations. Any difficulties, even the slightest, plunge into panic and drive into depression. Prone to self-deprecation. Avoid making any "sharp movements". Sincerely convinced of their servile mission. The rise of others on the rank ladder can be perceived as sedition and condemned. Any person with any high rank or ranking potential is perceived by a low-ranking, low-primative person as a ruler. How allies are useless and even harmful. If they manage to be drawn into a conflict on their side (which is almost impossible due to fear of conflicts), they will not help, but they will easily betray an ally with any, even imaginary, signs of strengthening the enemy. Having crossed to the opposite side, they can, out of cowardice, give out any secrets. In work, the effectiveness of such people is low due to the unwillingness to climb the rank ladder, which means the lack of motivation for highly effective work. An obsequious slave is a low-ranking, low-primative person. However, oddly enough, I met such people even among middle managers.

What do real men love? © Thinkstock

Probably, every woman at least once in her life had to exclaim, “Well, why, Lord, Sasha (Vanya, Kolya, etc.) does this and not otherwise? Understand him!" And in response - silence ... Alas, even the Lord God does not undertake to reason with a man. Do you know why? Because He Himself created them like that... What kind of - "such"? different. And it's stupid to ignore it.

What are men like?

An interesting and very understandable classification of men is given by Alexander Sviyash in his book "Sex as a joyful psychotherapy for very busy uncles and aunts". (The book can be purchased at the empik.ua online store). However, this classification is true not only for men, but also for women.

According to Alexander Sviyash, all people can be conditionally divided into two large groups: high primative and low primative. (Not to be confused with primitiveness! These are completely different terms).

Highly primative people- these are those whose instincts prevail over the arguments of reason. The main life motto of such people is “Love everything that moves”. Mass residence of such people is observed, for example, in our friendly Georgia. (Alexander Sviyash emphasizes that the abundance of highly primative people is typical for countries with difficult conditions for survival; prosperous Europe has long been giving birth to predominantly low primative people).

The main characteristic of a low primative male- the predominance of the mind over instinct. They will think a hundred times before doing something.

Important note: a highly primative person can be a doctor of science, an academician, and a low primative person can be a complete ignoramus. However, Alexander Sviyash nevertheless makes a reservation: among low-primative people, there are still very few frankly stupid people ...

Sexual signs of men with well-developed instincts

INhighly primative people in love are hot and able. True, highly primative people usually have an abundance of partners ...

Low primative men I also want sex. But not with all available women, but with one chosen one for your mind and heart. Low primal men will not scour the stone jungle in search of a beloved. They are focused on calm, open, trusting relationships with one and only (well, two!) Women.

Who are the primates and "wise men" looking for?

Primates are ideally looking for a virgin. Women's innocence is an attribute that is very important in a highly primative community and completely meaningless in a "smart" environment. It is very important for a male primate to get, in his eyes this is a huge bonus.

A reasonable man is unlikely to decide on a serious relationship (read - marriage) without making sure that he is good in bed with this woman. And female innocence for him is an extra problem.

The main mistake of women

“Women are not used to paying attention to the primativity of a partner and when communicating with a man they like, they use standard marital behavioral strategies. That is, they flirt and create barriers to access their bodies,” writes Alexander Sviyash.

In almost all attractiveness courses, teachers advise choosing the tactics “He is the hunter, and I am the game” as the main seduction strategy. Alas, this strategy is only win-win for highly primative men! Obstacles only inflame such a man and cause a desire to achieve the goal at any cost. The more actively the "game" escapes, the higher the temperature of the blood in the veins of the "hunter".

Alas, having achieved his goal, a highly primative man does not enjoy the victory for very long ... If he managed to get married, he sends his soul mate to the kitchen, and he himself - sorry, "the pipe is calling." If the march of Mendelssohn has not sounded, the primacy disappears ...

Coquetry - a woman's weapon? Yes, if the man is a primate.

A low-primative man makes a rational conclusion: “To be flirty means to be hypocritical. It is hardly worth expecting openness and sincerity from her, it's time to dump. It’s a pity, of course, she seems to be a good young lady, but ... the soul does not lie. Yes, it is difficult for a low-primative soul of a man to accept standard

Natural tribal hierarchy with sexual substructures.

The hierarchical structure of the male part is similar to the structure of the herd - pyramidal. The position in the hierarchical pyramid (rank) is determined by the overall viability of the individual. In an ancient tribe, this vitality is determined, as in the human herd, by ranking potential plus physical data and aggressiveness. Although the pyramid is no longer supported only by the rigidity of dominance, but also by rational motivation and altruism lower layers.

At the very top of the pyramid of power is the leader - the most aggressive and strong warrior. He is the quickest wielding his stone axe, so challenging his power is fraught with trouble. Psychologists call such a man "alpha". Ethologists call such a male high-ranking. Below the leader are the strongest and most aggressive warriors of a lower rank, the middle-ranking “gammas”, but they have a real chance to take the place of the leader if something happens. Even lower are all the rest, low-ranking “omegas”, who may not even dream of a leader’s position, but dream and strive to become middle-ranking.

High-ranking ones get bigger and better loot pieces. Women love them. Since we are here considering the biological foundations of our species and instinctive behavioral programs, then it will be more logical and convenient to use the terminology of ethologists who study animal instincts.

Signs of a high rank according to Protopopov:

High self-esteem, tendency to underestimate others
Faith in your infallibility, no doubt
Resolute concern for your comfort, health and safety
Optimism, confidence in the future
Boastfulness, self-satisfaction
The tendency to make decisions quickly, without much deliberation.
The ability to act regardless of the opinions and problems of others, asociality
Non-reflexivity.
High threshold of guilt
Painful perception of criticism, difficulties with self-criticism
Decisiveness, enterprise, initiative, perseverance
Great professional, social and property ambitions
Organizational skills
Openness, shamelessness, extraversion
Stubbornness, obsession, conflict initiative, selfishness
Conflict resilience
sexual success

Signs of a low rank according to Protopopov:

Low self-esteem, tendency to form an inferiority complex
Ability to tolerate inconvenience, discomfort, and unsafe living conditions
Tendency to pessimism and depression; uncertainty about the future
Indecisiveness, long reflections before making decisions.
Dependence on the opinions of others, fear of offending someone, reflexivity
Low threshold of awareness of one's guilt, shame (the feeling of guilt arises at the slightest provocation)
Willingness to be satisfied with the status quo, conformism
Lack of great career and property ambitions
Low organizational skills
Altruism, self-sacrifice, self-criticism
The tendency to bow before authorities, to believe them; religiosity
secretiveness, introversion
Shyness, compliance, modesty, timidity, law-abiding
Touchiness and scrupulousness
sexual failure

This pyramidal hierarchical structure is copied to this day, for example, in Russian army. The rank of a male in the hierarchy is determined by certain signs on shoulder straps, and the rank and file are artificially humiliated, tortured and deprived of the opportunity to have sex in order to bring down ranking ambitions and force them to obey unquestioningly.

Women are, as it were, a little on the sidelines, not clearly entering the male hierarchy and not clearly forming their own clear hierarchical structure. And at the same time they keep close to their men. But when it is necessary to throw a scandal to men, they quickly unite. The female community forms the reproductive core of the tribe, so it is unusually close-knit. And not only psychologically, but even physiologically. In the women of the group, even ovulation is synchronized. And they all stare at the leader and strong warriors. And none of them like weak men. This has a deep biological meaning. The offspring must be viable, so the father must be a strong viable man. The weak and unviable should not multiply, even despite the excess of women. Therefore, in many, including some modern cultures polygamy is practiced. A viable (and therefore rich) man has many women and children from them. The communities of many animals are organized in a similar way. Strong males have harems, while weak ones have no chance of mating with a female. Everything is logical and rational from a biological point of view.

While the tribe remained small, all the instincts of people corresponded exactly to their biological purpose and real way of life. Therefore, the majority in the tribe still consisted of strong and rather aggressive men with high ranking potential and behavior controlled by these instincts. Simply put, they did not really think about the meaning of life and other high matters, but lived in a simple way. They did what they wanted. And they wanted what instinct dictated. Since the desires and emotions of a person are nothing more than a manifestation of the instincts that control this person. People who live by instincts, that is, by desires and emotions, are called highly primative . Living in the mind low primative . We will be especially interested in the high-ranking, low-primative members of our tribe. Psychologists designate such a man with the letter "beta". These are the men who think more with their heads than trust their emotions. This is either a shaman or a skilled hunter who prefers the excitement of the hunt to the struggle for the leader's position. In the ancient tribe, there were few high-ranking low-primatives, since the instinct corresponded to the way of life, and ancient man it was more advantageous to be highly primal. In addition, the low-primative high-ranking leader did not like the high-primative high-ranking leader, whose male hierarchical instinct saw him as a competitor. After all, both the shaman and a good, prolific hunter enjoyed great authority among their fellow tribesmen, had their own opinions and interests, which inevitably undermined the authority of the leader and led to conflicts with him. But since both the shaman and the prolific hunter were very much needed by the leader and did not particularly claim his place, the leader tolerated them in small quantities. Well, the female instinct of women could not understand why they were not like everyone else, and took low primativity for a low rank. That is, not all women were able to love them. There were few of them in the primitive tribe, quite a few ... However, later, as the society grew larger, the role of the low-primatives sharply increased, they multiplied and formed the basis of civilization.

All this is very important for our further narration, so the reader must remember all these terms and their meaning, at least in a simplified way, they will occur very often in the text. Moreover, understanding further text unthinkable without knowledge of these terms:

high ranking - self-confident, successful, authoritative, cool.
low rank - a weakling and a loser.
highly primative - living only emotions and desires (instincts).
Low Primitive - capable of rational behavior, able to oppose reason and calculation to emotions and desires (instincts).
Rank Potential - the ability to become high-ranking.

Male types:

High-ranking highly primative - violent, self-confident, untrained, uncontrollable, constantly proving in a fight that he is right. In ancient times - the leader. Nowadays, either an alcoholic and a loser, or a bandit.

High rank low primative - Self-confident smart strong male. In ancient times, a shaman or good hunter. Nowadays - successful businessman, boss or highly paid specialist.

Low rank high primative - a loser, a coward and a bastard. Six. At all times.

Low rank low primative - a coward and a weakling, but a trainee. IN ancient world- food for tigers. IN modern world- Lifetime petty clerk.

Medium-ranking combine the qualities of high-ranking and low-ranking in different proportions. transitional form. When interacting with low-ranking ones, they behave like high-ranking ones. When interacting with high-ranking ones, it is similar to low-ranking ones.

Now read the meanings of the terms at least 5 more times to better remember them. It is important. And bookmark this page in case you forget. I promised not to abuse scientific terminology. But without these key concepts, further narration is simply unthinkable. They are the basis for understanding the structure of human societies, evolution, history and gender relations.

Let us make a reservation right away that no matter how low-primative a person is, he is not able to completely suppress instincts with his mind. Only to some extent. Highly primative - not capable at all. Moreover, instincts can turn off the mind. Then they say that a person acts spontaneously, in a state of passion, on a whim, overwhelmed by passions, emotions, stupidly, etc. If instinct blocks a person’s information input channels, they say that a person is stupid. For example, a highly primative child may not perceive information from a teacher, since the child's hierarchical instinct does not consider the teacher to be sufficiently authoritative and high-ranking. But it is worth raising the authority of the teacher or introducing elements of the game into learning, as the blocking is removed, and the child begins to perceive information normally. That is, if you take into account the game of instincts, then they can be controlled. For example, the mind of a man says that you need to lose weight. But it is very difficult to suppress the food instinct with reason. There is a wish. In this case, you can make the installation that you need to lose weight in order to please young women. In this case, a strong sexual instinct works against the food instinct. Therefore, losing weight is easier. These methods are used by psychology and psychotherapy. If instincts interact with a weak mind, then this is called stupidity. If with a strong mind - emotionality.

So, an ancient small tribe consisted mainly of highly primative individuals with a relatively high rank potential and controlled by innate instinctive behavioral programs of both the level of a human herd and the level of a tribe with a paired internal structure. Instinctive programs were formed in the conditions of life of a small community of people in an environment wildlife and met the same conditions. The main differences between the set of human instincts at the level of an ancient tribe and the herd ones are the appearance of weak altruistic instincts, elements of innate morality, low primativity, and also the instincts of interaction between a male and a female in a stable pair.

Everything that is described in this chapter, all the qualities, elements of behavior and foundations of relationships that have been formed over hundreds of thousands of years of evolution of our kind and over tens of thousands of years of evolution of our species, which are necessary for human survival, were genetically fixed in the form of innate instincts. It will be difficult for you to believe this, and at the same time, a simple truth is obvious to any biologist: SINCE WE HAVE NOT CHANGED. Well, there, the loincloth began to be called a miniskirt, sewn from a different material and decorated in a different way. And the mammoths have already been eaten. And everything else is still. That is, everything that we just peeped with such interest in the tribe of our ancestors is enshrined in our instincts (innate biological programs) to this day. Our entire civilized life today consists of pieces of these programs, and the mind, upbringing and education only serve and slightly correct their work.

For our further presentation, it is important for us to understand one very important thing:

Our species formed when people lived in small communities. Family, small tribe. That is, in our innate instincts, the behavioral stereotypes necessary for survival in a family or a small group surrounded by wildlife in an environment of danger and lack of food are fixed. Since then, we ourselves and our instincts have not changed, only the conditions of existence have changed. And instincts - do not correspond to the changed conditions of existence. In other words, desires and emotions control us as if we live in primitive world, but really around the 21st century and man-made civilization.