Options for combining different ranks and different primatiality of men. Your predecessor, a highly primative man

RANK- this is the psychological level that a man occupies in the system of relations with other people

Just take the following for granted. After many years of searching, I can say that of all the classifications of men, this is the most natural and correct. The rest is garbage.

Three kinds of men

Want to see an example of a high-ranking man? Watch the movie " Thief" 1997. Vladimir Mashkov brilliantly and in all its beauty conveyed the features of a strong man.

High-ranking man is everywhere. He can live in your porch, house or on your street. Such a man can be your colleague at work. To be high-ranking, he does not have to be famous or very rich. Do not confuse social status and psychological rank!

It is these men who have an animal love for life! And women. Women themselves feel this and are drawn to such men. And to make it even clearer what exactly makes his rank high, let's analyze the thinking and behavior of such a man on the shelves. Let me remind you once again that rank is the level that a man occupies in relationships with other people. And here's what makes his rank high:

He may lose all his possessions, his family or business may fall apart! BUT! He will always build new house or create new family. However, it should be clear: he may not have a home in his whole life, he may not have a family, but his character will remain just as strong! A man with a high rank does not change!

There are few such men. Not enough for all women. According to my observations - 2 out of 10. Therefore, women sometimes marry more convenient and comfortable men - middle-ranking ones. Such men can achieve a lot if they stop delving into themselves.

2. Middle-ranking man

Let the film help in understanding this image. The geographer drank away the globe". Konstantin Khabensky skillfully showed the type of a middle-ranking man. This role was natural for him, because he belongs to this category of men.

According to my observations - 5 out of 10 are middle-ranking men. The danger and at the same time the advantage of such a status is that this man can potentially become high-ranking if he can solve problems with and eliminate the desire to be convenient for women. By the way, this is what my "" is dedicated to, where we with men at weekly meetings solve these problems in their lives.

But on the other hand, such a man is always afraid to slide down, to become weak.

Middle-ranking man always can be identified by the chameleon effect: with the weak, he behaves like a strong one. And next to the strong, he behaves like a subordinate.

The mid-ranker is in a constant struggle with himself. And therefore for him the decisive role is played by what kind of woman he meets: one can break him, the other will help him become king. And next to him is the queen. So he toils, in search of himself, his woman and the meaning of his life.

Men with an average rank - change!

But such a man will always need either the support of the woman with whom he will be in union. Or in a more experienced comrade, a strong man.

These are the men who go to training all the time. personal growth or some other growth: Sparta, Goal, leadership programs, pickups, etc. Such men strongly try to copy the behavior and even the thinking of strong men. And this can be misleading for women, thinking that he is strong.

Their life is a search for themselves. And, unfortunately, if other men do not help them, then this search can last a lifetime, until death.

A woman with such a man can be happy and unhappy at the same time. Her future with him is unpredictable. Because he is unpredictable.

3. Low-ranking man

An example from a famous movie. In this case - " Love affair at work". Andrei Myagkov managed to show the image of a low-ranking man.

You must understand that the low-ranking man is everywhere. He can live in your porch, house or on your street. Such a man can be your colleague at work. He can be your husband, brother, father. And if you are a man - then maybe it's you?

At the same time, he may well be a famous and wealthy person if he has some kind of creative talent. But such a man does not know how to be an organizer. Therefore, someone else is in charge of the money in his life.

It is these men who have an animal fear of ... life. And women! And the women themselves feel it and are drawn to them. Yes, don't be surprised. To be friends! It is with low-ranking men that women can have friendship! This is the answer to the age-old question “is friendship possible between M and F?” - Yes. And to make it even clearer what exactly makes his rank low, let's analyze the thinking and behavior of such a man on the shelves.

Low rank man on his own does not change!

Such men lack the most important thing - desire! The desire for life, the desire for development, the desire for love, the desire for struggle, the desire for achievement, the desire to be a master. I don’t work with such people, and if someone asks me to help a low-ranking man, I immediately say that this is a dead number. These people don't change. I once wrote an article about this, which became popular on the Internet.

Low-ranking people cannot be motivated. They don't make decisions. And any attempts to teach such a man to make choices and be responsible for his life are perceived by him as violence against his personality.

Enough of these men. According to my observations - 3 out of 10. They have their own consumer - as a rule, these are women who have problems in relations with their mother. What is the connection - to explain for a long time. But the connection is direct. Such women choose low-ranking men and then destroy them, wash them into powder. They drive them under the heel, weave ropes out of them, and because of impotence, they begin to drink too much. And if children appear in this family, then they become a continuation of their parents: an unfortunate strong daughter and an unfortunate weak son.

How do women intuitively check a man's rank?

With the help of accusations, manipulations, provocations, claims. If a man begins to make excuses - low-ranking. If he begins to rationally lay out everything on the shelves, negotiate with her - middle-ranking. If he jokes, does not attach importance, or it does not shake him - high-ranking. Simply put - if she can artificially provoke him, piss him off - then he is not strong enough for her. This is an indication of his weakness in front of her.

Woman like it(I'm talking about normal women) when she can't manipulate a man. She likes it when she can't subdue him. And even more like it when he gently subdues her. Not violently. This should happen naturally.

In the instinctive firmware of the male, 3 main programs were formed, which are switched on depending on his position in the hierarchy.

Hierarchy of males. rank

Leader instinct (high-ranking) - a set of instinctive programs that allow the leader to manage the herd, control the situation. Here and increased conflict stability, and the highest self-confidence, and imperious intonations, and the ability to manipulate individuals and groups. The instinct of the leader also includes responsibility. The leader vigilantly monitors the situation, raises the alarm in case of danger and protects his herd, leading a detachment of males. The leader feels the herd as an extension of his body. He perceives it as part of himself. The leader also has an instinct for territory, from which the human instinct for property later developed. With females, the leader has an unlimited number of matings and is convinced that it cannot be otherwise. If possible, he drives away other males from females.

Midrange instinct. Middle-ranking males are less responsible than the leader, they control low-ranking ones, gain the favor of females by feeding, as they are lower in the herd hierarchy, value sexual handouts and are afraid of the leader. When the leader weakens, the strongest of the middle ranks takes his place, and the instinct of the leader turns on in him.

Low ranking instinct. A low-ranking one has a very low self-esteem, is afraid of middle-ranking ones, idolizes the leader, and only dreams of females. When trying to copulate with a female, it is driven away by females and middle-ranking males. Doesn't value life. Doesn't care about himself. But pleases others in the hope of their favor. In the absence of pressure, he takes the position of a mid-ranker, and therefore, he turns on the corresponding set of instincts.

Signs of a high rank according to Protopopov:

o High self-esteem, a tendency to underestimate others.

o Faith in one's infallibility, no doubt.

o Resolute concern for your comfort, health and safety.

o Optimism, confidence in the future.

o Boastfulness, self-satisfaction.

o Tendency to make decisions quickly, without much thought.

o The ability to act, regardless of the opinions and problems of others, asociality.

o Non-reflexivity, proactivity.

o High threshold of guilt.

o Painful perception of criticism, difficulty with self-criticism.

o Decisiveness, enterprise, initiative, perseverance.

o Great professional, social and property ambitions.

o Organizational skills.

o Openness, shamelessness, extraversion.

o Stubbornness, obsession, conflict initiative, selfishness.

o Conflict resistance.

o Sexual success.

Signs of a low rank according to Protopopov:

o Low self-esteem, a tendency to form an inferiority complex.

o The ability to put up with inconvenience, discomfort, and unsafe living conditions.

o Tendency to pessimism and depression, uncertainty about the future.

o Indecisiveness, long reflections before making decisions.

o Dependence on the opinions of others, fear of offending someone, reflexivity, reactivity.

o Low threshold of awareness of one's guilt, shame (the feeling of guilt arises at the slightest pretext).

o Willingness to be satisfied with the status quo, conformism.

o Lack of great career and property ambitions.

o Poor organizational skills.

o Altruism, self-sacrifice, self-criticism.

o Secrecy, introversion.

o Shyness, compliance, modesty, timidity, law-abiding.

o Touchiness and scrupulousness.

o Sexual failure.

It is interesting that the male with the instinct of the leader turned on is practically not able to lower his rank in the hierarchy. It's irreversible. He can be killed, exiled, but not demoted. In a solitary state, a truncated version of the leader instinct works for him - the instinct of a lone male. Mode "leader without a herd." The rank of a medium rank can be downgraded to a low rank.

Thus, it can be conditionally considered that the biological species Homo sapiens, in fact, has 4 sexes. Females and three sexes of males - high-ranking, middle-ranking and low-ranking. What sex the male is determined by the instinctive program that is currently active in his brain. This program determines both his behavior, including psychophysiological elements, and the behavior of the female in relation to this male. The last three sexes are usually referred to in one word - men. From here traditionally there is a lot of confusion, which until now has not allowed to correctly describe and interpret modern intersexual relations.

IN modern world low-ranking or high-ranking is not a position in a real modern social hierarchy, but a set of active instincts. Can take a position CEO, but at the same time possess a set of instincts (self-awareness) of a low-ranking one. Although, usually the position in the real hierarchy and the set of instincts still correspond to each other.

Primativity

While the tribe remained small, all the instincts of people corresponded exactly to their biological purpose and real way of life. Therefore, the majority in the tribe still consisted of strong and rather aggressive men with high ranking potential and behavior controlled by these instincts. Simply put, they did not really think about the meaning of life and other high matters, but lived in a simple way. They did what they wanted. And they wanted what instinct dictated. Since the desires and emotions of a person are nothing more than a manifestation of the instincts that control this person. People who live by instincts, that is, desires and emotions, are called highly primative. Those who live by reason are low primative. We will be especially interested in the high-ranking, low-primative members of our tribe. Psychologists designate such a man with the letter "beta". These are the men who think more with their heads than trust their emotions. This is either a shaman or a skilled hunter who prefers the excitement of the hunt to the struggle for the leader's position. In the ancient tribe, there were few high-ranking low-primatives, since the instinct corresponded to the way of life, and ancient man it was more profitable to be highly primative. In addition, the highly primative high-ranking leader did not like the low-primative high-ranking leader, whose male hierarchical instinct saw him as a competitor. After all, both the shaman and a good, prolific hunter enjoyed great authority among their fellow tribesmen, had their own opinions and interests, which inevitably undermined the authority of the leader and led to conflicts with him. But since both the shaman and the prolific hunter were very much needed by the leader and did not particularly claim his place, the leader tolerated them in small quantities. Well, the female instinct of women could not understand why they were not like everyone else, and took low primativity for a low rank. That is, not all women were able to love them. There were few of them in the primitive tribe, quite a few ...

However, later, as the society grew larger, the role of the low-primatives increased sharply, they multiplied and formed the basis of civilization.

Definitions:

High-ranking - self-confident, successful, authoritative, cool.

Low-ranking - a weakling and a loser.

Highly primative - living only with emotions and desires (instincts).

Low primative - capable of rational behavior, able to oppose reason and calculation to emotions and desires (instincts).

Male types:

High-ranking highly primative - violent, self-confident, untrainable, uncontrollable, constantly proving that he is right in a fight. In ancient times - the leader. Nowadays, either an alcoholic and a loser, or a bandit.

High-ranking low-primative - self-confident smart strong male. In ancient times, a shaman or good hunter. Nowadays - successful businessman, boss or highly paid specialist.

Low-ranking, highly primative. - a loser, a coward and a bastard. Six. At all times.

A low-ranking low-primative is a coward and a weakling, but a trainable one. IN ancient world- food for tigers. In the modern world, a lifelong petty clerk.

Medium-ranking combine the qualities of high-ranking and low-ranking in different proportions. transitional form. When interacting with low-ranking ones, they behave like high-ranking ones. When interacting with high-ranking ones, it is similar to low-ranking ones.

Hierarchy of females. rank

High-ranking.

Characteristic average age- from 15 ( puberty) up to 21-23 years. At this age, a woman has maximum sexual attractiveness. She is able to sincerely love a man, idolize him, that is, treat him like a leader. In the ancient world, a young (and therefore not quite independent, vulnerable and requiring guardianship) female, as soon as she matured, was given to the leader. She loved him. He wanted and provided unlimited sex. They were guarded and fed. And from him she gave birth to the first, most healthy cubs. That is, it performed the main function of the female - continued the genetic line of the most viable male. Accordingly, she was perfectly happy, since her sexual and hierarchical instincts were satisfied. That is why, in our species, it is young females that are most sexually attractive, and not mature ones, like in monkeys. It has always been prestigious to have a young girlfriend or wife, because according to the program laid down in us, this is a marker of the leader. That is why all old women diligently try to be like young women (on which the entire “beauty industry” is actually built).
In the modern world of VR, the female is the faithful loving friend and wife. Most traditional balanced cultures support exactly this (BP) mode and stretch it for life. That is, a woman's youth and happiness are extended for life. That is why virgins have always been valued. That is why they were given in marriage at the age of 13-15. And an 18-year-old unmarried woman was considered "stayed up in girls." That is why kindness, complaisance, modesty were valued in a woman - the qualities of a VR female. That is why a wife and mother is a respected person in a traditional society. This is an exclusive female, guarded by the leader. From childhood, a girl was brought up in the spirit of respect (recognition of a high rank) by a man. Husband is destiny, it is for life. The duty of a woman is to honor him and obey him. This is how the hierarchy of the family was purposefully formed with the husband - the leader and the wife - his exclusive female.
In this context, the attitude towards the first-born is also understandable. The first-born is a cub from the leader, from the most viable male. And he is given the maximum chance to become a leader if it is a boy. Therefore, in our species there is a cyclic dependence of the qualities of the child on the number of the mother's pregnancy. And the first-born has the maximum innate ranking potential. This could not be overlooked even in the early stages of the formation of civilization. And that is why in most traditional cultures the first-born are valued, and it is they who inherit the material resources of the father.
Under matriarchy (in SR-NR society), this VR level becomes thinner. That is why matriarchy does not welcome early marriages. Girls are brought up in a spirit of disrespect for men. Thus, dominant SR females do not allow attractive young, potentially VR females to reach the resources of established males. And mature males are prohibited from having sexual contacts with young sexually mature females, for example, by increasing the so-called “age of consent”.

Medium rank.

The characteristic age is 23-30 years. Having matured and having lost the “charm of youth”, the female was expelled by the leader and descended to a lower level, SR. Usually she already had a cub or cubs from the leader. And according to old memory, she enjoyed some protection of the latter. But in order to feed herself and her offspring, she provided strictly dosed sex to sufficiently strong and prolific SR males for feeding and protection. In order to survive in the SR layer, the female needed completely different qualities than in the VR layer. Now it was necessary not so much to love, obey and be faithful and altruistic, but to manipulate, maneuver, intrigue, gain and compete with other female SWs for the prey of males. Survive. Therefore, the set of active instincts of the SR female is very different from that of the VR female. The SR female tends to give sex to the male who has the prey, and not to the only loved one. Simply put, she's a prostitute.
Any balanced culture that actively forms a life-long SR layer of society in every possible way keeps the female's innate programs from switching to the SR level. With active SW females, that is, with professional and household prostitutes, traditional culture actively fights. They are called fallen, vicious, purposefully deprived of access to resources and expelled to the bottom of society. That's why they used to say "spoil" the girls. The fact is that the inclusion of the SR level often works when the first, beloved man quits. At this moment, an instinctive reaction is triggered to the expulsion of favorites from the harem by the leader. And this change in the work of instinct is irreversible. Therefore, from the point of view of a balanced society, such a female, unable to love and be faithful, is defective. That is why premarital sexual activity of women is unacceptable in traditional cultures. The change in the active program of the female from VR to SR can also be due to age. And that is why in the region of 21-23 years old, on average, the psychology of many women changes radically. They themselves are surprised to notice that they are becoming "bad", that is, more cynical, prudent, losing the ability to love and respect a man, gaining experience of dominance, manipulation. It's just the biological clock.
With modern matriarchy, the SR layer is as wide as possible and is actively reproduced. Women who truly love strong man, are extremely rare. A SR female, seeing a VR female, becomes envious and tries in every possible way to bring her down to her own level. For example, a classic situation is when single divorcees, whether they are work colleagues or “girlfriends”, purposefully provoke married woman for cheating on her husband or other actions leading to the destruction of her family. VR females purposefully form a negative image. To love and obey a man is considered stupid. And loyalty is considered a legacy. On the contrary, it is considered prestigious and smart to sell profitably. Being a kept woman, that is, a domestic prostitute who sells wholesale sex, is an honor. The ultimate dream of many modern women.
The expansion of the SR layer is also facilitated by sexual freedom, joint education of boys and girls, as well as the lack of education of young people in traditional culture. Girls usually go through the VR level too quickly, even at school, when they fall in love with some kind of blockhead, whom the instinct of the female, according to formal signs, will take for the leader. When the aforementioned blockhead abandons the girl "spoiled" by him, she turns on the CP level of the program. And having descended to the SR level, she perfects the methods of manipulating males right up to the attempt of marriage. This happens often, but not always. Sometimes a young female continues to search for her leader for a long time. She wants to be exclusive and true. But with each new male, the probability of including the SR program increases. Sexual freedom, provoking a young female to frequent changes of sexual partners, also makes it difficult for her to perceive any male as exclusive, beloved. That is, a woman loses the ability to become a VR. Women call it "wasting yourself". Raising girls in the spirit of selling sex, their orientation towards consumption wealth- also contributes to the inclusion of the SR program immediately. In matriarchy, therefore, a woman, passing quickly or bypassing the BP level, immediately descends to the SR or HP level. That is, her basic instinct cannot be satisfied in principle. And this means that she is doomed to be unhappy, and all her life to be content with only small allowances from the consumption of material goods.
Within the SR layer of females, there is a hierarchy structure of its own with very fierce competition for male resources. The status of a female in the SR layer of the herd was determined by how satisfying the SR males fed this female for sex. Therefore, female SRs, as well as male SRs, are characterized by a hypertrophied desire to acquire and demonstrate the amount of resources that an individual possesses, simply boasting and showing off. What is the biological basis of the consumer society. Individuals lowered to the SR level, not confident in themselves, are much more inclined to possess objects of material culture that they do not need. Especially if you position these items as status items. SW females are actively engaged in shopping in order to somehow compensate for the lack of happiness by receiving small pleasures. In fact, the greatest fraud of the modern world - the consumer society - is based on the fact that at first all people were lowered to the CP level. And then they sold them a mountain of various crap, which they objectively do not need. That is, they replaced happiness with petty pleasures. And the man became the unfortunate owner of things that were vtyuhannyh, but completely unnecessary.
SR females at the age of fiercely envy young competitors and hate them. One day I did the following experiment. On one of the women's forums on the Internet, where most of the participants were in their 40s, I created a topic that young women are much more attractive and desirable than old ones. Despite all the evidence of this thesis, the forum participants alternately tried to convince me of the opposite and spewed abuse at me for three whole years!!! Moreover, in women's groups consisting of SR females, one can observe how, when a female SR gets there, a campaign of psychological persecution immediately unfolds. SW females treat her in every possible way, ridiculing her fidelity to her husband or virginity depending on her age. SR females persistently try to bring her down to their level, emotionally winding her up, provoking betrayal or hatred and a consumer attitude towards men.
For females of the SR level, sexual behavior, make-up and clothing are characteristically emphasized. That's why clever man on underlined sexy women pays no attention. An experienced SR female, successfully manipulating males, that is, dominating them, can enter a regime of stable dominance with age. Then they say that the woman has "been mad". She becomes self-confident, "stubborn to the point of impenetrability", aggressive, conflict, loses the ability to compromise with a man, negotiate, give in. She no longer sells sex for feeding, but seeks obedience directly. Accordingly, such a woman no longer seeks to emphasize her sexuality and monitor her appearance. She doesn't need it anymore. Very often, these females are obese.
The SR level of the herd hierarchy largely consisted of young males and no longer young females. An echo of this herding trend is the modern matriarchal phenomenon of the growing number of couples, where an experienced dominant older woman dominates a young husband or lover.

Low rank.

Over time (typical age from 30 years to death), the female grew old, lost sex appeal, mobility, became of no interest to anyone for feeding and protection and became publicly available. An HP female is a female that copulates with many males in the hope that at least someone will feed her (in the modern world they are called the word fucking). So it existed for a short time in the HP layer, until it was devoured by some predator. Therefore, after 30 years, women usually increase "sexuality". Paired existence and reproduction at this age are not biologically provided. Therefore, marriages with women "over 30" are usually unstable, and gynecologists call these women "late-born". This is also the reason that at the age of about 30, many women who are already married begin to actively cheat on their husbands and destroy their families.
In a traditional society, this layer is practically absent or exists in the form of a thin layer on the social bottom. With modern matriarchy, on the contrary, it is quite wide, which additionally destabilizes society and contributes to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

Woman's happiness.
The basic instinct of a human being, a block of hierarchical and reproductive programs, can only be satisfied at the VR level. Accordingly, only the VR female experiences a feeling of happiness. The main program of the female is fulfilled only if she is at the top of the hierarchy, is the exclusive female of the leader, receives food from him, is protected by him and has offspring from him. Therefore, it is this regime that is purposefully initiated and maintained in traditional cultures by the method of forming a family hierarchy with a husband at the head. And that is why modern matriarchal women are unhappy, despite their material well-being.

Functions

Males (men) carried out external, most dangerous functions. Hunting, defense, wars and the capture of prey. All this requires great physical strength, courage, dexterity, a powerful mind, curiosity, the ability to learn, coherence of actions in a group, the ability to sacrifice oneself for the interests of the tribe. Therefore, men are usually characterized by such behavioral features as friendship, mutual assistance, a tendency to be guided not only by their own benefit, but also by the interests of their comrades-in-arms and the tribe as a whole, the ability to plan actions, including for a very distant future, and the ability to act in extreme situations. In fact, men performed a buffer function between the reproductive part of the tribe (women and children) and the aggressive environment, were the expendable part of the human society and the working material of evolutionary experiments natural selection. Of course, the strongest and most viable men survived and gave offspring. With no men around wildlife tribe to survive was completely impossible. Therefore, the birth of a boy, the future hunter and warrior, was considered a very great success. The more warriors and hunters, the stronger the tribe.

Children, human babies. Everything is clear with them. Their function is to survive and learn. Therefore, they kept in the wings among women and the elderly and "wound on their ears" all their gossip and stories. The children did not require special education, since their innate instinctive programs corresponded to their way of life, and they learned automatically, listening to the conversations of adults, watching their actions and joining the life of the tribe as they grow older. In the same way, children of wild tribes in isolated corners of our planet do not receive special training.

Old men. With the fading of the reproductive function, and with it the hormonal background, people become calmer (wiser) and more talkative. They love to teach young people about life and remember aloud about their youth. That is, the old people played the role of a receptacle for the experience of the tribe, its information and training center. Therefore, the elders were supposed to be respected and obeyed. With a new level of satiety and security, the tribe could already afford to support the surviving old people. Moreover, the receptacle of the life experience of the previous generation added to the competitiveness of the tribe, made it stronger.

Females (women). The main function is reproductive, reproduction. In order to implement it (conceive, endure, feed and raise a child to a relatively independent state), a woman needs several years. That is, a woman was a very valuable, reproductive part of the tribe. Therefore, it was placed in the safest, most satisfying and comfortable part of the human habitat (cave, house, hut) next to the hearth and food. Therefore, a woman was always guarded by men and was a valuable war booty. However, with a lack of men providing and protecting the tribe, a woman immediately lost her value, and society in some cases even got rid of the excess number of women as “extra mouths”, by killing newborn girls, burying women along with dead husbands and other barbaric from the point of view vision modern man ways.

Let us make a reservation right away that no matter how low-primative a person is, he is not able to completely suppress instincts with his mind. Only to some extent. Highly primative - not capable at all. Moreover, instincts can turn off the mind. Then they say that a person acts spontaneously, in a state of passion, on a whim, overwhelmed by passions, emotions, stupidly, etc. If instinct blocks a person's information input channels, they say that the person is stupid.

For example, a highly primative child may not perceive information from a teacher, since the hierarchical instinct of the child does not consider the teacher to be sufficiently authoritative, high-ranking. But it is worth raising the authority of the teacher or introducing elements of the game into learning, as the blocking is removed, and the child begins to perceive information normally. That is, if you take into account the game of instincts, then they can be controlled. For example, the mind of a man says that you need to lose weight. But it is very difficult to suppress the food instinct with reason. There is a wish. In this case, you can make the installation that you need to lose weight in order to please young women. In this case, a strong sexual instinct works against the food instinct. Therefore, losing weight is easier. These methods are used by psychology and psychotherapy. If instincts interact with a weak mind, then this is called stupidity. If with a strong mind - emotionality.

Conclusion

So, an ancient small tribe consisted mainly of highly primative individuals with a relatively high rank potential and controlled by innate instinctive behavioral programs, both at the level of a human herd and at the level of a tribe with a paired internal structure. Instinctive programs were formed in the conditions of life of a small community of people surrounded by wild nature, and they corresponded to the same conditions. The main differences between the set of human instincts at the level of an ancient tribe and herd instincts are the appearance of weak altruistic instincts, elements of innate morality, low primativity, as well as the instincts of interaction between a male and a female in a stable pair.

All that is described above, all that was formed over hundreds of thousands of years of evolution of our kind and over tens of thousands of years of evolution of our species, the qualities, elements of behavior and the basis of relationships necessary for human survival were genetically fixed in the form of innate instincts. It will be hard for you to believe this, and at the same time, a simple truth is obvious to any biologist: SINCE WE HAVE NOT CHANGED.

Our species formed when people lived in small communities. Family, small tribe. That is, in our innate instincts, the behavioral stereotypes necessary for survival in a family or a small group surrounded by wildlife in an environment of danger and lack of food are fixed. Since then, we ourselves and our instincts have not changed, only the conditions of existence have changed. And instincts do not correspond to the changed conditions of existence. In other words, desires and emotions control us as if we live in primitive world, but really around the 21st century and man-made civilization.

Consider the hierarchy of a tribe consisting of a large number of individuals of both sexes, taking into account this sexual heterogeneity. The first thing that fundamentally distinguishes him from the family is that the tribe has a fairly powerful buffer part, there are many men in the tribe. That is, the loss of an individual male is not so dangerous for the survival of the tribe as a whole, and this will not affect reproduction in any way, there will always be a male inseminator. Second, the tribe is heterogeneous. There are strong and weak, stupid and smart, and so on. But what is much more important for further narration is that there are high-ranking and low-ranking, high-primative and low-primative ones.

Natural tribal hierarchy with sexual substructures.

The hierarchical structure of the male part is similar to the structure of the herd - pyramidal. The position in the hierarchical pyramid (rank) is determined by the overall viability of the individual. In an ancient tribe, this vitality is determined, as in the human herd, by ranking potential plus physical data and aggressiveness. Although the pyramid is supported not only due to the rigidity of dominance, but also due to rational motivation, and due to the altruism of the lower layers.

At the very top of the pyramid of power is the leader - the most aggressive and strong warrior. He is the quickest wielding his stone axe, so challenging his power is fraught with trouble. Psychologists call such a man "alpha". Ethologists call such a male high-ranking. Below the leader are the strongest and most aggressive warriors of a lower rank, the middle-ranking “gammas”, but they have a real chance to take the place of the leader if something happens. Even lower are all the rest, low-ranking “omegas”, who may not even dream of a leader’s position, but dream and strive to become middle-ranking.

High-ranking ones get bigger and better loot pieces. Women love them. Since we are here considering the biological foundations of our species and instinctive behavioral programs, then it will be more logical and convenient to use the terminology of ethologists who study animal instincts.

Signs of a high rank according to Protopopov:

High self-esteem, tendency to underestimate others
Faith in your infallibility, no doubt
Resolute concern for your comfort, health and safety
Optimism, confidence in the future
Boastfulness, self-satisfaction
The tendency to make decisions quickly, without much deliberation.
The ability to act regardless of the opinions and problems of others, asociality
Non-reflexivity.
High threshold of guilt
Painful perception of criticism, difficulties with self-criticism
Decisiveness, enterprise, initiative, perseverance
Great professional, social and property ambitions
Organizational skills
Openness, shamelessness, extraversion
Stubbornness, obsession, conflict initiative, selfishness
Conflict resilience
sexual success

Signs of a low rank according to Protopopov:

Low self-esteem, tendency to form an inferiority complex
Ability to tolerate inconvenience, discomfort, and unsafe living conditions
Tendency to pessimism and depression; uncertainty about the future
Indecisiveness, long reflections before making decisions.
Dependence on the opinions of others, fear of offending someone, reflexivity
Low threshold of awareness of one's guilt, shame (the feeling of guilt arises at the slightest provocation)
Willingness to be satisfied with the status quo, conformism
Lack of great career and property ambitions
Low organizational skills
Altruism, self-sacrifice, self-criticism
The tendency to bow before authorities, to believe them; religiosity
secretiveness, introversion
Shyness, compliance, modesty, timidity, law-abiding
Touchiness and scrupulousness
sexual failure

This pyramidal hierarchical structure is copied to this day, for example, in Russian army. The rank of a male in the hierarchy is determined by certain signs on shoulder straps, and the rank and file are artificially humiliated, tortured and deprived of the opportunity to have sex in order to bring down ranking ambitions and force them to obey unquestioningly.

Women are, as it were, a little on the sidelines, not clearly entering the male hierarchy and not clearly forming their own clear hierarchical structure. And at the same time they keep close to their men. But when it is necessary to throw a scandal to men, they quickly unite. The female community forms the reproductive core of the tribe, so it is unusually close-knit. And not only psychologically, but even physiologically. In the women of the group, even ovulation is synchronized. And they all stare at the leader and strong warriors. And none of them like weak men. This has a deep biological meaning. The offspring must be viable, so the father must be a strong viable man. The weak and unviable should not multiply, even despite the excess of women. Therefore, in many, including some modern cultures polygamy is practiced. A viable (and therefore rich) man has many women and children from them. The communities of many animals are organized in a similar way. Strong males have harems, while weak ones have no chance of mating with a female. Everything is logical and rational from a biological point of view.

While the tribe remained small, all the instincts of people corresponded exactly to their biological purpose and real way of life. Therefore, the majority in the tribe still consisted of strong and rather aggressive men with high ranking potential and behavior controlled by these instincts. Simply put, they did not really think about the meaning of life and other high matters, but lived in a simple way. They did what they wanted. And they wanted what instinct dictated. Since the desires and emotions of a person are nothing more than a manifestation of the instincts that control this person. People who live by instincts, that is, by desires and emotions, are called highly primative . Living in the mind low primative . We will be especially interested in the high-ranking, low-primative members of our tribe. Psychologists designate such a man with the letter "beta". These are the men who think more with their heads than trust their emotions. This is either a shaman or a skilled hunter who prefers the excitement of the hunt to the struggle for the leader's position. In an ancient tribe, there were few high-ranking low-primatives, since the instinct corresponded to the way of life, and it was more profitable for an ancient person to be highly primative. In addition, the low-primative high-ranking leader did not like the high-primative high-ranking leader, whose male hierarchical instinct saw him as a competitor. After all, both the shaman and a good, prolific hunter enjoyed great authority among their fellow tribesmen, had their own opinions and interests, which inevitably undermined the authority of the leader and led to conflicts with him. But since both the shaman and the prolific hunter were very much needed by the leader and did not particularly claim his place, the leader tolerated them in small quantities. Well, the female instinct of women could not understand why they were not like everyone else, and took low primativity for a low rank. That is, not all women were able to love them. There were few of them in the primitive tribe, quite a few ... However, later, as the society grew larger, the role of the low-primatives sharply increased, they multiplied and formed the basis of civilization.

All this is very important for our further narration, so the reader must remember all these terms and their meaning, at least in a simplified way, they will occur very often in the text. Moreover, understanding further text unthinkable without knowledge of these terms:

high ranking - self-confident, successful, authoritative, cool.
low rank - a weakling and a loser.
highly primative - living only emotions and desires (instincts).
Low Primitive - capable of rational behavior, able to oppose reason and calculation to emotions and desires (instincts).
Rank Potential - the ability to become high-ranking.

Male types:

High-ranking highly primative - violent, self-confident, untrained, uncontrollable, constantly proving in a fight that he is right. In ancient times - the leader. Nowadays, either an alcoholic and a loser, or a bandit.

High rank low primative - Self-confident smart strong male. In ancient times, a shaman or a good hunter. Today - a successful businessman, boss or highly paid specialist.

Low rank high primative - a loser, a coward and a bastard. Six. At all times.

Low rank low primative - a coward and a weakling, but a trainee. In the ancient world - food for tigers. In the modern world, a lifelong petty clerk.

Medium-ranking combine the qualities of high-ranking and low-ranking in different proportions. transitional form. When interacting with low-ranking ones, they behave like high-ranking ones. When interacting with high-ranking ones, it is similar to low-ranking ones.

Now read the meanings of the terms at least 5 more times to better remember them. It is important. And bookmark this page in case you forget. I promised not to abuse scientific terminology. But without these key concepts further narration is simply unthinkable. They are the basis for understanding the structure of human societies, evolution, history and gender relations.

Let us make a reservation right away that no matter how low-primative a person is, he is not able to completely suppress instincts with his mind. Only to some extent. Highly primative - not capable at all. Moreover, instincts can turn off the mind. Then they say that a person acts spontaneously, in a state of passion, on a whim, overwhelmed by passions, emotions, stupidly, etc. If instinct blocks a person’s information input channels, they say that a person is stupid. For example, a highly primative child may not perceive information from a teacher, since the child's hierarchical instinct does not consider the teacher to be sufficiently authoritative and high-ranking. But it is worth raising the authority of the teacher or introducing elements of the game into learning, as the blocking is removed, and the child begins to perceive information normally. That is, if you take into account the game of instincts, then they can be controlled. For example, the mind of a man says that you need to lose weight. But it is very difficult to suppress the food instinct with reason. There is a wish. In this case, you can make the installation that you need to lose weight in order to please young women. In this case, a strong sexual instinct works against the food instinct. Therefore, losing weight is easier. These methods are used by psychology and psychotherapy. If instincts interact with a weak mind, then this is called stupidity. If with a strong mind - emotionality.

So, an ancient small tribe consisted mainly of highly primative individuals with a relatively high rank potential and controlled by innate instinctive behavioral programs of both the level of a human herd and the level of a tribe with a paired internal structure. Instinctive programs were formed in the conditions of life of a small community of people surrounded by wild nature, and they corresponded to the same conditions. The main differences between the set of human instincts at the level of an ancient tribe and herd instincts are the appearance of weak altruistic instincts, elements of innate morality, low primativity, and also the instincts of interaction between a male and a female in a stable pair.

Everything that is described in this chapter, all the qualities, elements of behavior and the foundations of relationships that have been formed over hundreds of thousands of years of evolution of our kind and over tens of thousands of years of evolution of our species, which are necessary for human survival, were genetically fixed in the form of innate instincts. It will be difficult for you to believe this, and at the same time, a simple truth is obvious to any biologist: SINCE WE HAVE NOT CHANGED. Well, there, the loincloth began to be called a miniskirt, sewn from a different material and decorated in a different way. And the mammoths have already been eaten. And everything else is still. That is, everything that we just peeped with such interest in the tribe of our ancestors is enshrined in our instincts (innate biological programs) to this day. Our entire civilized life today consists of pieces of these programs, and the mind, upbringing and education only serve and slightly correct their work.

It is important for us to understand one very important thing for further presentation:

Our biological species was formed when people lived in small communities. Family, small tribe. That is, in our innate instincts, the behavioral stereotypes necessary for survival in a family or a small group surrounded by wildlife in an environment of danger and lack of food are fixed. Since then, we ourselves and our instincts have not changed, only the conditions of existence have changed. And instincts - do not correspond to the changed conditions of existence. In other words, desires and emotions control us as if we live in a primitive world, but in reality around the 21st century and technogenic civilization.

From the book Woman. Textbook for men"

Key concepts of human ethology

Natural tribal hierarchy with sexual substructures.

Consider the hierarchy of a tribe consisting of a large number of individuals of both sexes, taking into account this sexual heterogeneity.

The first thing that fundamentally distinguishes him from the family is that the tribe has a fairly powerful buffer part, there are many men in the tribe. That is, the loss of an individual male is not so dangerous for the survival of the tribe as a whole, and this will not affect reproduction in any way, there will always be a male inseminator. Second, the tribe is heterogeneous. There are strong and weak, stupid and smart, ... high-ranking and low-ranking, high-primative and low-primative.

Hierarchical structure of the male part similar to the structure of the herd - pyramidal. Position in the hierarchical pyramid ( rank) is determined by the overall viability of the individual. In an ancient tribe, this vitality is defined as in the human herd, ranking potential plus physical data And aggressiveness (energy). The pyramid is maintained not only due to the rigidity of dominance, but also due to rational motivation, and due to the altruism of the lower layers.

At the very top of the pyramid of power is leader- the most aggressive and strong warrior. He is the quickest wielding his stone axe, so challenging his power is fraught with trouble. Psychologists call such a man " alpha". Ethologists call such a male high-ranking. Below the leader - the most powerful and aggressive warriors of a lower rank, middle-ranking " scales”, but they have a real chance to take the place of the leader if something happens. Even lower - all the rest, low-ranking " omegas", who may not even dream of the place of the leader, but they dream and strive to become middle-ranking.

High-ranking ones get bigger and better loot pieces. Women love them.

Signs of a high rank according to Protopopov:

High self-esteem, tendency to underestimate others

Faith in your infallibility, no doubt

Resolute concern for your comfort, health and safety

Optimism, confidence in the future

Boastfulness, self-satisfaction

The tendency to make decisions quickly, without much deliberation.

The ability to act regardless of the opinions and problems of others, asociality

Non-reflexivity.

High threshold of guilt

Painful perception of criticism, difficulties with self-criticism

Decisiveness, enterprise, initiative, perseverance

Great professional, social and property ambitions

Organizational skills

Openness, shamelessness, extraversion

Stubbornness, obsession, conflict initiative, selfishness

Conflict resilience

sexual success

Signs of low rank according to Protopopov:

Low self-esteem, tendency to form an inferiority complex

Ability to tolerate inconvenience, discomfort, and unsafe living conditions

Tendency to pessimism and depression; uncertainty about the future

Indecisiveness, long reflections before making decisions.

Dependence on the opinions of others, fear of offending someone, reflexivity

Low threshold of awareness of one's guilt, shame (the feeling of guilt arises at the slightest provocation)

Willingness to be satisfied with the status quo, conformism

Lack of great career and property ambitions

Low organizational skills

Altruism, self-sacrifice, self-criticism

secretiveness, introversion

Shyness, compliance, modesty, timidity, law-abiding

Touchiness and scrupulousness

sexual failure

This pyramidal hierarchical structure is copied to this day, for example, in the Russian army. The rank of a male in the hierarchy is determined by certain signs on shoulder straps, and the rank and file are artificially humiliated, tortured and deprived of the opportunity to have sex in order to bring down ranking ambitions and force them to obey unquestioningly.

Women they are, as it were, a little apart, not clearly entering the male hierarchy and not clearly forming their own clear hierarchical structure. And at the same time they keep close to their men. But when it is necessary to throw a scandal to men, they quickly unite. Women's community forms the reproductive core of the tribe, so it's unusually cohesive. And not only psychologically, but even physiologically. In the women of the group, even ovulation is synchronized. And they all stare at the leader and strong warriors. And none of them like weak men. This has a deep biological meaning. The offspring must be viable, so the father must be a strong viable man. The weak and unviable should not multiply, even despite the excess of women. Therefore, in many, including some modern cultures, it is practiced polygamy. A viable (and therefore rich) man has many women and children from them. The communities of many animals are organized in a similar way. Strong males have harems, while weak ones have no chance of mating with a female. Everything is logical and rational from a biological point of view.

While the tribe remained small, all the instincts of people corresponded exactly to their biological purpose and real way of life. Therefore, the majority in the tribe still consisted of strong and rather aggressive men with high ranking potential and behavior controlled by these instincts. Simply put, they did not really think about the meaning of life and other high matters, but lived in a simple way. They did what instinct dictated. The desires and emotions of a person are a manifestation of the instincts that control this person. People who live by instincts, that is, by desires and emotions, are called highly primative. Living in the mind - low primative. We will be especially interested high-ranking low-primative members of our tribe. Psychologists designate such a man with the letter "beta". These are the men who think more with their heads than trust their emotions. This is either a shaman or a skilled hunter who prefers the excitement of the hunt to the struggle for the leader's position. In the ancient tribe, there were few high-ranking low-primatives, since the instinct corresponded to the way of life, and it was more profitable for an ancient person to be highly primative. In addition, the low-primative high-ranking leader did not like the high-primative high-ranking leader, whose male hierarchical instinct saw him as a competitor. After all, both the shaman and a good, prolific hunter enjoyed great authority among their fellow tribesmen, had their own opinions and interests, which inevitably undermined the authority of the leader and led to conflicts with him. But since both the shaman and the prolific hunter were very much needed by the leader and did not particularly claim his place, the leader tolerated them in small quantities. Well, the female instinct of women could not understand why they were not like everyone else, and took low primativity for a low rank. That is, not all women were able to love them. There were few of them in the primitive tribe, quite a few ... However, later, as the society grew larger, the role of the low-primatives sharply increased, they multiplied and formed the basis of civilization.

high ranking- self-confident, successful, authoritative, cool.

low rank- a weakling and a loser.

highly primative- living only emotions and desires (instincts).

Low Primitive- capable of rational behavior, able to oppose reason and calculation to emotions and desires (instincts).

Rank Potential- the ability to become high-ranking.

Male types:

High-ranking highly primative- violent, self-confident, untrained, uncontrollable, constantly proving in a fight that he is right. In ancient times - the leader. Nowadays - either an alcoholic and a loser, or a bandit.

High rank low primative- Self-confident smart strong male. In ancient times - a shaman or a good hunter. Today - a successful businessman, boss or highly paid specialist.

Low rank high primative- a loser, a coward and a bastard. Six. At all times.

Low rank low primative- a coward and a weakling, but a trainable one. In the ancient world - food for tigers. In today's world, a lifelong petty clerk.

Mid-ranking combine the qualities of high-ranking and low-ranking in different proportions. transitional form. When interacting with low-ranking ones, they behave like high-ranking ones. When interacting with high-ranking ones, it is similar to low-ranking ones.

Let's say right away that no matter how low-primative a person is, he is not able to completely suppress instincts with reason. Only to some extent. Highly primative - not capable at all. Moreover, instincts can turn off the mind. Then they say that a person acts spontaneously, in a state of passion, on a whim, overwhelmed by passions, emotions, stupidly, etc. If instinct blocks a person's information input channels, they say that the person is stupid. For example, a highly primative child may not perceive information from a teacher, since the child's hierarchical instinct does not consider the teacher to be sufficiently authoritative and high-ranking. But it is worth raising the authority of the teacher or introducing elements of the game into learning, as the blocking is removed, and the child begins to perceive information normally. That is, if you take into account the game of instincts, then they can be controlled. For example, the mind of a man says that you need to lose weight. But it is very difficult to suppress the food instinct with reason. There is a wish. In this case, you can make the installation that you need to lose weight in order to please young women. In this case, a strong sexual instinct works against the food instinct. Therefore, losing weight is easier. These methods are used by psychology and psychotherapy.

If instincts interact with a weak mind, then this is called stupidity.

If with a strong mind - emotionality.

An ancient small tribe consisted mainly of highly primative individuals with a relatively high rank potential and controlled by innate instinctive behavioral programs of both the level of a human herd and the level of a tribe with a paired internal structure. Instinctive programs were formed in the conditions of life of a small community of people surrounded by wild nature, and they corresponded to the same conditions. The main differences between a set of human instincts at the level of an ancient tribe and herd instincts are the appearance of weak altruistic instincts, elements of innate morality, low primativity, as well as instincts for the interaction of a male and a female in a stable pair.

All the qualities, elements of behavior and foundations of relationships that were formed over hundreds of thousands of years of evolution of our kind and over tens of thousands of years of evolution of our species, which are necessary for human survival, were genetically fixed in the form of innate instincts. It will be hard for you to believe this, and at the same time, a simple truth is obvious to any biologist: SINCE WE HAVE NOT CHANGED. Well, there, the loincloth began to be called a miniskirt, sewn from a different material and decorated in a different way. And the mammoths have already been eaten. And everything else is still. That is, everything that we just peeped with such interest in the tribe of our ancestors is enshrined in our instincts (innate biological programs) to this day. Our entire civilized life today consists of pieces of these programs, and the mind, upbringing and education only serve and slightly correct their work.

Our biological species was formed when people lived in small communities. Family, small tribe. That is, in our innate instincts, behavioral stereotypes are fixed that are necessary for survival in a family or a small group surrounded by wildlife in an environment of danger and lack of food. Since then, we ourselves and our instincts have not changed, only the conditions of existence have changed. And instincts - do not correspond to the changed conditions of existence. In other words, desires and emotions control us as if we live in a primitive world, but in reality around the 21st century and technogenic civilization.

Wooing a woman, winning her favor is not only a stupid, useless, but also harmful occupation. First I will explain why the conquest of a woman is a losing doctrine.

We already know that a subconscious, instinctive attitude towards a man is formed already in the first minutes of a woman's acquaintance with him. It is practically impossible to influence this feeling further: a woman (or rather, her instincts) immediately understands whether she wants this man and under what conditions she wants, who is in front of her - a high-ranking male or a low-ranking supplier.

From the editors of the KOB-Media website. High-ranking men are of 2 types:

1) high-ranking low-primative (VRNP) - a person whose behavior is mainly subject to reason, education. He can control his instincts. This is an intelligent person who recognizes manipulation.

2) high-ranking highly primative (VRVP) - a man whose behavior in more subordinated to instincts, rather than reason, education. He has almost no control over his instincts. This is an aggressive male, alpha, leader, macho, savage.
Read more about rank and primativity.

When a person “enters” the human type of psyche structure, he completely “leaves” the logic of rank and here other schemes are required to describe the male/female relationship.

So, prolonged courtship, wooing, all these flowers, gifts, compliments from the point of view of the female instinct is nothing but the behavior of a low-ranking male. Such a male brings gifts, demonstrates humility and controllability, readiness to give up his resources in exchange for a bit of attention and favor from the female. Man, remember: by such behavior you yourself are positioning yourself as a low-ranking one. And low-ranking women do not like. They are milked, they are used.

A simple thought that follows from this fact: it is pointless to fight for a woman. For the instinct of a woman decides, and the brain of a woman only gives out an adjustment to the decision prepared by instinct. and the competition in coolness between males, the subsequent demonstration of power, money - all this lies at the level of a woman's perception of a low-ranking man, a potential cash cow who, if at all, gets sex, then as a reward mating.

Have you seen a donkey with a carrot hanging in front of its nose? Often this is how a woman's treatment of a persistent boyfriend looks like: rapprochement does not occur, but it is not excluded. Gifts and courtship, accepted by a woman, although without much enthusiasm, but with a share of favor, support the hope of the suitor and stimulate his perseverance.

Another visual analogy is the bench.

Remember the movie "Beloved woman mechanic Gavrilov"? The heroine Gurchenko feels abandoned and abandoned by her fiancé, and as a means of calming, psychological compensation, she turns to the stash in the form of a “bench”. She comes to the man who loves her unrequitedly long years. And, although the heroine does not want any real relationship with them, she, as a woman, is pleased to realize that the bench is not yet empty. This means that it is still listed. This is called “pulling the string”: visiting an old friend and reading in his eyes the love and willingness to stand up.

Who came up with that women should be sought, conquered, earned their favor?

When the term “marriage is unbearable” comes up, a woman, according to the principle "anyone" agrees to what is at hand: “You need to get married!". The woman remembers the “bench” or simply gives the go-ahead to the boyfriend who has appeared. The rank of such a man in the eyes of a woman is below the plinth.

Women's forums are littered with questions like: " I love one, but another, whom I don’t love, calls for marriage, what should I do, girls?»

The problem is that a man is sure: he won a woman, achieved and that she finally “appreciated and fell in love with him”. He DESERVED a woman. And how bitter is his disappointment when, after several years of life, it turns out that he was not loved at all, but only played along and endured.

This is where the reason for many family dramas: a woman suppresses the lack of an instinctive attraction to a low-ranking man in favor of pragmatic motives (”), but sooner or later the instinct still breaks out in the form of betrayals and divorces or manifests itself in the form of dominance over a loving henpecked husband, a woman’s chronic dissatisfaction, her scandals and tantrums on level ground.

The one that for a long time cared for and achieved, invested in the family, in the woman, in common Home, into the future - in one moment he is deceived, defeated, betrayed, trampled. But it was not the woman who deceived him, but he himself! He was deceived by a stupid belief that a woman must be conquered: it was necessary to choose the woman who chose him herself.

The heroine of the movie Crew”After many years of scandals, divorce and division of the child, she confesses to her ex-husband:

“Yes, I don’t love you. Never loved. I was a young girl, stupid. And you arrived: a pilot, a Muscovite. He quit everything because of me ... I saw that he was in love to death. I just took pity on you and left. But it wasn't necessary."

And what is the correct scenario for courtship and rapprochement with a woman? Here he is:

You need to let the woman know that you are interested in her. Show your affection for her. Invite her to a cafe, for a walk in the park, to the theater. Give flowers [ From the site editor. At the beginning of the article, it says no flowers.] Do you work together? Invite to dine with you. Under specific circumstances, the sign of attention on your part may be different. It is important that the woman UNDERSTAND it precisely as your invitation to rapprochement.

If a woman likes you, then she will ALWAYS let you know this in response to your “request”. A certain experience will allow a man to see the “green light” completely unmistakably. There is strength in simplicity. In the end, the courtship ritual, the entire flower and candy period, is a game according to the rules already well known to both sides. A sane woman who likes you will not demand constant sacrifices, gifts, endless signs of attention, going to restaurants, etc., but will move TOWARDS you step by step.

You invited a woman to the cinema. She said she can't today, she's busy. Look at the tone: it is very easy to understand if she is really busy or busy FOR YOU, i.e. She just doesn't want to go with you. In the first case, obvious regret will be heard in the voice.

Do you have doubts? Invite her again on another day, in another place. ? The woman did not respond with readiness, did her eyes sparkle with reciprocal sparks? Everything, this woman is not with you. Just don't get upset or make up a drama. This is a business, nothing personal: some women choose you, others do not choose - it was, it is and it will be so.

So: win and achieve those women who did not immediately show interest in you - a losing low ranking male strategy. The strategy is not only useless, but also dangerous. To seek a woman, to fight for her with other men is not only stupid, senseless, but also harmful. Just choose from those women who have chosen you.

From the editors of KOB-Media. Knowledge of mechanisms psychological impact between the sexes will be useful to everyone, so as not to allow themselves to be manipulated.
The writers D. Seleznev, A. Biryukov, O. Novoselov and others have well described the methods of psychological manipulation that are characteristic of non-human types of mental structure (animal, zombie, demon), which still prevail in today's matriarchal consumer society. And Humanity and human relationships are considered in « «, « «, ), « «.