Who is the padva Mr. n. Protect me, sir. Marital status of Padva

Heinrich Padva is the founder and managing partner of Padva & Partners. He became a lawyer when he graduated from university in 1953. His career began in the provinces, and then he became one of the main symbols of the legal profession in Russian Federation.

Merits

Lawyer Heinrich Padva often and with big hunt undertook the most difficult of the available cases. It was he who made a great contribution to ensuring that the death penalty in our country was recognized as contrary to the Constitution. Genrikh Padva was engaged in the protection of the chairman of the USSR Armed Forces, the manager of the Presidential Administration, Pavel Borodin. He also led the case of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, connected with Yukos.

Lawyer Genrikh Pavlovich Padva has an active life position V professional activity as well as in leisure. He is passionate about motor sports, football. For for long years he is a Spartak fan. He has participated in the Snob project since 2009.

Genrikh Padva became an Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, a laureate of the gold medal named after F. N. Plevako.

Family

The lawyer was born on February 20, 1931 in Moscow. His father's name was Pavel Yurievich. The mother of Padva Heinrich Pavlovich is Rapopport Eva Iosifovna. His first wife was Noskova A.M., she died in 1974. The current wife's name is Mamontova O.S. The couple has a daughter and a granddaughter.

Biography

Genrikh Pavlovich Padva was born in a family of representatives of the Moscow intelligentsia. His father was a major engineer and held one of the responsible positions in large-scale projects. So, the father of Padva Heinrich Pavlovich, Pavel Yuryevich Padva, participated in the design of the Northern sea ​​way. Its leaders were the legendary Schmidt and Papanin. He received a shell shock while participating in the Great Patriotic War. Since 1945 he was the commandant of the German city, he was engaged in reparation issues. At the time of the victory he was the captain. The mother of Padva Heinrich Pavlovich was a ballerina who had wonderful external data. Having given birth to a son, she leaves the stage, but becomes a dance teacher.

Before the start of the war, their son was a student of the prestigious school No. 110, next to him grew up the children of high-ranking statesmen, scientists, artists. Graduates of the school have achieved many successes in a variety of professions. And the level of teaching was educational institution very high.

War

At the beginning of the war, Genrikh Padva and his family members were evacuated to the city of Kuibyshev (Samara). They began to live with their distant relatives: 10 people in one room slept on the floor and on chests. Nevertheless, it was during this period of time that many wonderful events and new meetings took place. For example, the playwright, who was returning to the capital, lived in this room for several days, after serving his term in the camp where Stalin exiled him. Heinrich Padva had the most wonderful memories of him: he was an unusually interesting person in communication, who also had strong qualities. He showed fascinating charades, which was also deposited in the memory of a little boy.

As soon as the Germans were driven back from the capital, mother, Eva Iosifovna Rapopport, and Padva Genrikh Pavlovich were able to return home, repair a room in a communal apartment, which was heated with a makeshift brick stove.

After the war

The boy continued to study at the same school and graduated by 1948. He did not enter the Moscow Law Institute the first time: the future lawyer Genrikh Padva did not score the required number of points. It should be noted that in those years they took into account whether the applicant was a member of the Komsomol, and the young man did not particularly want to be one, the “nationality” column was also important.

The second attempt, a year later, turned out to be more successful - the future lawyer Padva scored points that pulled him to pass.

Having confidently passed the Russian language, literature and history, in matters of geography he was not so strong. The question of the rivers of Great Britain turned out to be overwhelming, and he received "satisfactory". The future lawyer Heinrich immediately felt a blatant injustice and, leaving the audience, asked the same question to many. However, most of those to whom he addressed it, even geographers by training, did not remember anything but the Thames.

University years

When the entrance exams were over, the future lawyer Genrikh Pavlovich Padva was invited to the Minsk Law Institute. He began his studies there, moving to Minsk. He studied very well: he passed the first sessions with excellent marks.

According to reviews of the lawyer Padva from his associates of those years, Heinrich found time for both sports and amateur student activities. He appreciated the highly qualified teachers who worked in the educational institution. After 2 semesters, he is transferred to the Moscow Law Institute.

First independent steps

Heinrich is released from it in 1953. He was assigned to work in Kalinin, which is now called Tver. There he becomes an employee of the local department of justice. Padva began his career as a lawyer with a six-month internship in Rzhev. It was a beautiful old city. After completing the internship, Heinrich went to the regional center Pogoreloe Gorodishche. It was a small settlement where he becomes the only lawyer.

Being a native Muscovite, Heinrich was surprised at the exoticism of provincial life: he lived in the corner of a wooden house, there was a barnyard nearby, lilacs were blooming in the front garden, and trills of birds were heard from the nearby forest edge.

He memorized many happy memories related specifically to this period of life: he managed to hunt wolves, go on a real fishing trip, collect a full basket of mushrooms and take long walks through the forests. But the most grandiose experience was the acquaintance with the life of the common people, who lived in the most difficult conditions, in poverty and total lack of rights.

The first cases of Heinrich Padva were litigations between ordinary front-line soldiers convicted of hot words against the USSR and the state. These were the most ordinary local settlers, young workers who were preparing to be imprisoned for being a couple of minutes late for work.

The then justice was often too cruel and unfair. In those conditions when for the smallest offenses a person could be imprisoned for a long time - for 10, 15 years - with an unenviable rarity, cases ended successfully for Heinrich's clients.

But nevertheless, little by little, the authority of the lawyer gained momentum both in the courtroom and among local residents. His opinion, his arguments became more and more convincing, they were already listened to by the district prosecutor, who was an honest and decent person, although he did not have a higher education.

After 1.5 years, Heinrich continued his career in Torzhok. Here he again hones his skills, constantly growing, reading many books. This was largely facilitated by the peculiarities of provincial life, in which there was not much entertainment. She gave him a lot of free time. It was during this time period that he met his future wife.

Soon the lawyer moves to Kalinin, where his soulmate studied. Soon the couple is getting married. Engaged in law practice, Heinrich enters the history department of the local pedagogical institute. Among the main reasons for this act was that he did not want to be forced to study in a party school. It was the way to avoid it.

Return to Moscow

Gaining more and more professional authority, Heinrich returned to the capital in 1971. At first, the small homeland met Padva completely unfriendly, it was difficult for him to adapt, since after the province a certain inhumanity was especially striking big city. Everywhere here flourished bureaucracy, which was extremely abundant.

Padva's colleagues helped to overcome many difficulties. In many ways, during this period, I. Sklyarsky, Deputy Chairman of the Presidium of the Moscow City Bar Association, influenced the life of Heinrich. As a lawyer, both professionals and the public began to appreciate Padva. His extraordinary talent became visible to everyone.

Padva gained great fame in the course of the case of an American businessman and the Izvestia newspaper. The businessman sued her for slandering him. He won the case in his homeland, and it was decided to collect large compensation from the publication moral damage which she inflicted on him. However, the incident for a long time ignored by official Soviet structures who knew that the Americans were limited in the matter of enforcing the decision of their court in cases concerning the Soviet Union.

But US representatives began to act actively, seizing the property of the Izvestia office located in the United States. Then this case became a real threat to diplomatic relations between the two countries. It took the mobilization of all major legal resources. As a result of the response actions that were taken by a number of domestic lawyers under the leadership of G. Padva, the decision of the American court was canceled. It was a brilliant victory.

It is important that a couple of years later Padva met with the injured person who initiated this proceedings. At that time, the entrepreneur had already retired and noted that he did not hold a grudge against Padva, who demonstrated many valuable professional qualities in that process.

First fame

Starting from that period of time, the name Padva acquired the epithets "famous", "venerable" wherever it was found in the press. He became known to everyone: the photo of Heinrich Padva often appeared in the press.

In the course of many years of subsequent practice, he managed to participate in a variety of proceedings, in which the media were involved, which caused violent reactions and protests from the society, were widely publicized.

Russia

The 1990s turned out to be a unique experience for Padva, during which he won many victories that cemented his success and great authority in the professional field.

During the putsch in August 1991, Genrikh Padva was vice-president of the Union of Lawyers of the USSR and, while in the United States, made statements to lawyers different countries, proclaiming the illegality of the events taking place in his native country. So, he emphasized that the actions of the State Emergency Committee were illegal.

He returned to the capital at a time when the putsch had not yet been defeated, and could have been arrested. The likelihood of this was high. However, the events soon came to an end, and a couple of days after the arrests of the putschists, Padva received a call from the daughter of A. Lukyanov, asking to speak in defense of her father.

After reviewing the details of the case, Heinrich stressed that he was not going to evaluate the dramatic events that unfolded in the country differently, but agreed to defend Anatoly Ivanovich. However, he did not support the actions taken by the putschists.

First of all, Padva made a statement on TV that accusations against his ward are unacceptable, even if he is the ideologist of the putsch. The thing is that everyone has their own political views and has the right to them. People should not be persecuted just for their dissent. The argument was accepted, the streams of accusations gradually faded away.

The lawyer argued that the accusations of high treason against Lukyanov were unacceptable, however, as well as against the other members of the State Emergency Committee. As for the defendant personally, his direct participation in the putsch was all controversial. It was for this reason that the question arose before Lukyanov and Padva: is it worth accepting the amnesty of the State Duma in the case of the State Emergency Committee? At that time, due to the many experiences that befell the client, he was not in the best state of health. Then it was decided to accept an amnesty. Further struggle for justice would have cost many losses and risks to the life of the client Padva.

In 1996, the case of P. Karpov thundered throughout the country. He was deputy CEO Federal Office for Business Insolvency. He was charged with accepting a bribe while at a Saratov enterprise. Karpov was arrested twice - both in Saratov and in the capital. The proceedings in his case were extremely protracted, but thanks to the efforts and assistance of Padva, he was rehabilitated.

In the midst of the 1990s, Genrikh Padva took up the defense of the influential businessman L. Weinberg, who was also accused of giving bribes. A high-profile case was the case when he handed over a piece of jewelry to one of the employees of the customs committee.

An investigation into the case by the Prosecutor General's Office began. Numerous violations of the rights of the accused were revealed. Padva achieved that he was soon released, and then the case against Weinberg was completely stopped.

Soon, the law office of Heinrich Padva began to operate, in which, together with his colleagues, the lawyer achieved success in many cases. Thus, one of the famous cases was the saga associated with the arrest of P. Borodin, whom the Swiss prosecutor's office accused of money laundering and joining an organized crime group. Together with E. Sergeeva, Padva came to the defense of the ex-managing director of the Presidential Administration.

Heinrich Padva's bureau worked simultaneously with Russian political government bodies and with US legal authorities. It also interacted with Swiss investigators.

By April 2001, all charges against their client were dropped. He was no longer accused of complicity in an organized criminal group, already in March 2002, the Geneva prosecutor also stopped the prosecution of the former business manager.

The trial involving Elkaponi also became loud. It started in 2003. Then G. Padva, together with Gofshtein, defended a politician and a businessman from Azerbaijan. He was charged with possession and transportation of illegal drugs. Elkaponi was the head of the People's Patriotic Union "Azerbaijan-XXI" when, in June 2001, he was arrested with 1 kg of heroin. Some of the banned substance was seized from the businessman's clothes, and some was found in his home. The discovery was made by employees of the Department for Combating Illicit Drug Trafficking of the Main Department of Internal Affairs of Moscow.

Lawyers proved that the heroin could not belong to their client and was planted. In March 2003, the Azerbaijani was acquitted by a Moscow court. Elkaponi was released from custody. He spent more than one month in prison.

One of Heinrich's clients was the ex-chairman of the board of directors at the Krasnoyarsk Aluminum Plant. For many years, A. Bykov was a frequent hero of many articles in the media, as his case was given the widest possible publicity. Court chronicles were full of references to him.

In 1999, the first attempt was made to convict him for being involved in the murder and money laundering. Bykov was detained in Hungary and brought to the Krasnoyarsk pre-trial detention center. However, in the autumn of 2000 he was released. So the court ruled Central region Krasnoyarsk. After some period of time, he was again detained, accusing him of organizing an assassination attempt on businessman V. Struganov in Krasnoyarsk.

Padva stood up to defend him, citing a weighty argument that clearly showed that Bykov was innocent. However, the Meshchansky Court of Moscow issued a peculiar decision. Bykov's guilt was recognized, but as a punishment he was given a suspended sentence of 6.5 years. Moscow city court this decision was upheld.

Since the lawyer himself knows for sure that his client is innocent, and also notes the presence of many violations of the rights of his client, which manifested themselves during the trial, he is still seeking an appeal against the verdict. He even reached the Strasbourg Court of Human Rights.

In March 2003, Genrikh Padva took part in the trial in a new criminal case against A. Bykov. It proved his involvement in the murder of businessman O. Gubin.

However, already in July 2003, Bykov and his accomplices were found not guilty. Nevertheless, Bykov was found guilty under Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (covering up a murder that was committed without aggravating circumstances). The defendant Padva was sentenced to 1 year in prison, but was quickly amnestied.

G. Padva never advertises only those cases in which excellent results have been achieved. So, in his portfolio there are different results. Padva compares his profession with a medical specialty: not in all cases a doctor can provide assistance, and a lawyer sometimes does not have unlimited power.

To this day, the failure that ended in a civil case related to the return of part of the legacy of Boris Pasternak to his beloved causes great regret in his heart. Immediately after his death, she was arrested. She was accused of smuggling, but then rehabilitated.

Padva, defending her, managed to reach the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, but still the legacy greatest writer has not been returned. Although this should have been done, in accordance with both legal and universal norms. It came to absurd events and a real mockery of Pasternak's memory: the state demanded documents from Ivinskaya stating that Pasternak gave her his manuscripts. This despite the fact that the poems were dedicated to her personally.

It is a well-known fact that Genrikh Pavlovich Padva, a lawyer whose salary is considered one of the highest in the Russian Federation, in special situations can provide his high-quality legal assistance absolutely free of charge. His equally famous colleague Henry Reznik argues that Padva has a rather rare quality, which is called the highest legal culture.

Heinrich Pavlovich Padva: biography, education

The birthplace of the future Honored Lawyer of Russia is the capital of our country. Date - 02/20/1931. Parents - Padva Pavel Yurievich and Rapoport Eva Iosifovna.

In 1953, Genrikh Pavlovich Padva received higher education at the Moscow Law Institute. As a result of the distribution, he ended up in the Kalinin region.
In 1961 he graduated in absentia from the Kalinin Pedagogical Institute, Faculty of History.

From 1953 to 1971, his place of work was the Kalinin Regional Bar Association. He trained for six months in Rzhev, later for more than a year he led singular law practice in the district center, which is called the Pogoreliye Gorodische. Later he worked as a lawyer in the cities of Torzhok and Kalinin.

Since 1971, the biography of Heinrich Pavlovich Padva has been associated with the capital, he entered the Moscow City Bar Association. In 1985, he became a member of its presidium and at the same time director of the Scientific Research Institute of the Bar, established by the Moscow Bar Associations.

In 1989, Padva Genrikh was elected vice-president of the USSR Bar Union, and later in 1990 to a similar post in the International Bar Association (Union).

In 2002, he began working as a lawyer in the Moscow Chamber of Lawyers, establishing and leading as a managing partner a law firm called Padva and Partners.

Awards and regalia

Taking into account the contribution made to the development of the practice of law in Russia, Padva Genrikh Pavlovich was awarded the Gold Medal. Plevako in 1998

A significant personal contribution to the improvement of the existing legislative structure, many years of law practice in the protection of civil law and freedom of a particular individual led to the awarding of him in 1999 with the honorary sign "Public Recognition".

Padva Heinrich Pavlovich: reviews, biography

Padva Heinrich in 1991-1994, within the framework of the "GKChP case", managed to obtain an amnesty for his client, who was the former chairman of the USSR Armed Forces Anatoly Lukyanov.

With the help of Padva, Lev Weinberg, a major businessman, was released in 1996, and later his criminal prosecution was stopped.

In 1996-97, the defendant of the lawyer was Pyotr Karpov, accused of bribery, Federal Office for insolvency cases, the position of deputy director. He was taken into custody twice and released on a subscription the same number of times. Ultimately, the criminal case was dropped due to an amnesty.

The former head of Rosdragmet Evg. Bychkov in 2001 also came under an amnesty. Some of the charges were dropped from him.

manager Russian President Pavel Borodin was Padva's client in 2000-2002. He was arrested in the Mabetex case. Ultimately, the case against Borodin was dropped.

The head of the board of directors of KrAZ, Anatoly Bykov, was a defendant of a lawyer in 2000 and 2003. He was given a suspended sentence.

Entrepreneur Frank Elkaponi (Mammadov), who was accused of storing and transporting narcotic substances, was justified by the efforts of Pavda.

Pavda's clients were also Yukos organizer M. Khodorkovsky, actor Vladislav Galkin, ex-minister Anatoly Serdyukov, criminal authority Vyacheslav Ivankov.

Business failures

The biography of Heinrich Padva includes not entirely successful moments. In the period from 1994 to 2001, the lawyer had to represent the side of Olga Ivinskaya, who was B. Pasternak's girlfriend, in a lengthy lawsuit related to the fate of the Pasternak archives.

This civil case ended unsuccessfully for the defendant Pavda. He, recalling this process, says that some moments were often absurd. Sometimes the memory of a brilliant writer was simply mocked. For example, on the part of officials, demands were made for the provision of documents confirming the fact that Ivinskaya had been donated handwritten poems dedicated to her. The side of the writer's daughter-in-law was defended by the lawyer Lyubarskaya.

When defending the ex-head of Yukos, M. Khodorkovsky, the lawyer also did not achieve an acquittal. Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev each received eight years in prison. Andrey Krainov (the head of the Volna company), who is involved in the same case, was sentenced to four and a half years probation.

High profile clients

Padva Heinrich defended the interests of the ex-head of the Russian government, Mikhail Kasyanov, who was involved as a witness in a case involving the Sosnovka property complex (former state dachas), sold to him and M. Fridman (head of Alfa Group) in violation of existing legislation. For quite a long time, there were many rumors that Kasyanov would be brought to criminal punishment in connection with this, but they even left him a dacha in his possession.

As a lawyer, Pavda acted with N. Lugovsky (former co-founder and general director of the Sibneft joint venture), who tried in 2003 to return the money in the amount of eight hundred thousand dollars, which at the end of 1994 was confiscated from him by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation as material evidence. Until December 2008, it was not possible to return the money, while it was established that some of them had disappeared.

In November 2010, Pavda defended M. Beketov, who previously worked as the editor-in-chief of the Khimkinskaya Pravda newspaper, who received a disability after an attack by unidentified persons.

Marital status of Padva

Pavda's first wife was called Albina, she died in 1974. They had a joint daughter.

For the second time, the lawyer married an art critic and assistant notary Oksana Mamontova, born in 1971, who was forty years younger than him. She previously studied at the Moscow Law Academy, had a son named Gleb from a previous marriage. Gleb's attitude to Heinrich Pavlovich is very good, as to his own father.

A marriage contract has been concluded between the spouses, which provides that in the event of a divorce proceeding, only things belonging to her will remain with the spouse personal nature, as well as the property recorded on it.

As noted in the press, quite expensive gifts are presented to the wife from Padva: cars, antique jewelry in the form of rings and earrings.

Interests and hobbies

Among Padva's hobbies, his love for fine arts. Among his favorite artists are Utrillo and El Greco.

He is also interested in the work of contemporary artists. In particular, he prefers the work of N. Nesterova.

Photo by Pravo.Ru

In 2012, according to the results of a joint study by VTsIOM and the Russian Reporter magazine, 81-year-old lawyer Genrikh Padva was recognized as one of the authoritative figures in the Russian legal community. Today it is hard to believe that after graduating from school, he twice failed to enter the Moscow Law Institute. Last year, Padva celebrated his 60th anniversary in the profession, but when asked if he has a desire to retire, the elder of the lawyer shop admits that he is tired, but retiring for him means physical death and he continues to work. Pravo.Ru tells about Padva's career, his attitude to the legal profession, money, relations with clients in his own words.

About the beginning of a career

I went to the Kalinin region for distribution. First, my friend Yura Yurbursky received a ticket there, and he persuaded me to ask to join him. Yes, I am characterized by nostalgia, attachment to my native ashes, fatherly coffins. I consider Tver province to be my second homeland.

At first they wanted to send me to Vologda, but I did not agree, and as a result, one absurdity occurred. The commission began to wonder why I was refusing to go to Vologda. I said: "I can't, I have a sick elderly father alone in Moscow, I can't leave him alone and go far." And the director [of the institute] Butov objected to me very unsuccessfully: “Just think, you have one father, I also have one old father, so what?” I plucked up the audacity and replied: "Well, you're not going anywhere from Moscow." This made a huge impression on the commission, and one of the important leaders in the commission burst out laughing and said: "All right, the person needs to find something closer." And they offered me the current Tver region.

I do not regret that during the difficult years I got a job in the Burnt Gorodishche, and in Rzhev, and in Torzhok. It was good school and it was very helpful for me. In youth, of course, all this was experienced.

In the Burnt Settlement, I was with the judge on "you" and, as they say, by the hand. We drank together and walked together, and the prosecutor and the investigator were with us. We were one company.

In the first decade of my practice as a lawyer, I received terrible slaps in the face from various court decisions, even wrote letters of resignation from the bar. Now, too, sometimes I give up, my mood deteriorates for a long time, but I no longer fall into terrible despair from failures. Another case is heard - and you go, put all your passion, all your professional experience, all your understanding of life and people into it.

About the main achievements and failures

If we talk about my "career", then you need to understand that lawyers do not have any career in the generally accepted sense. I started working as a lawyer, and I work to this day. He did not earn any positions or ranks. The lawyer can only become more and more famous. In this sense, I had a serious breakthrough, which was connected with the Izvestia case during the Soviet era. An American entrepreneur sued the newspaper for libel in an American court and won the case. At first, the Soviet authorities did not pay attention, but then the arrests of Izvestia's property abroad began. I had to resort to the help of professional lawyers. They called me, although I was known only in professional circles. The case was reviewed, the decision was canceled. Naturally, the newspaper covered the process and wrote that her interests were represented by lawyer Padva. Apparently, they did not want to write simply "Padva", so they added epithets: first "famous", then "venerable" and, finally, "famous".

Professionally, I have achieved a lot, including changing the practice of all Russian courts on various fundamental issues. But the most important thing is that I turned to constitutional Court with a motion to declare the death penalty unconstitutional. Since then, we have not used it.

There were cases after which I wanted to shoot myself, at least leave the profession. In the book ["From the bag and from prison ... Notes of a lawyer"] I describe a case almost fifty years ago, when the prosecutor asked my client for ten years. According to the chairman of the court, I gave a brilliant speech, caused a storm of applause - and after that my client was sentenced to death. In my practice, there were two or three such shocks. But these negative feelings are compensated when you hear the words: "Release from custody in the courtroom." This is also too much emotion, and here you need, if not validol, then Valery Yanka.

About the choice of cases

Most of all [when choosing a case] I am driven by professional passion. Imagine you are a surgeon. Aren't you interested in trying a heart transplant someday, instead of digging around in panaritiums all your life?

I don't take on things I'm not interested in. I also don’t take on small, simple things. When I am now approached with cases of petty theft or drugs, I refuse. I even forgot what articles provide for punishment for these crimes. They can be conducted by my assistants.

Sometimes I was absolutely sure that I would win the case - and lost miserably. And it happened the other way around: the case is hopeless, but the client begs: "Take it!" Okay, you take it reluctantly - and suddenly a brilliant result.

I am sometimes told: you can not take up the case, but give us at least a legally correct position - they say, there is no such corpus delicti, but there is such and such. When I feel that something is not clean in the case, I try not to participate in it.

A lawyer must be, on the one hand, biased and act only in favor of his client, and on the other hand, be able to see and soberly evaluate all the evidence, which is very difficult with excessive interest and excitement. Many surgeons do not undertake to operate on their loved ones. That's how I am close, native person I will not defend. And even more so yourself.

About preparing for the process

For the first twenty years of my legal practice, I wrote my speeches from top to bottom. Everything in them was thought over, carefully verified. Up to punctuation marks: for a long time I weighed what to put at the end - a dot, an ellipsis, an exclamation point or a question mark. I could, for example, end like this: "After everything that you have heard here, dear comrades of the judge, what other sentence can be passed, except for an acquittal?"

A pre-written speech is a dangerous thing. Lawyers who write well, but do not know how to properly use writing, dry up their speeches. They read, and it is badly perceived. One must be able to write, then make what is written as if someone else's, and then again appropriate and tell this someone else's. Sometimes it seems that he is ready for a speech, that there is complete clarity in his head. And you try to put your thought on paper - there are not enough words. So, in fact, there is a fog in my head. And to dispel it, you need to compose a speech.

About judges, prosecutors, investigators

The authorities have never interfered so actively in the work of the judiciary as they do today. Please note: even Stalin dealt with people not with the help of the courts, but with the help of “troikas”, where there were no lawyers. The courts were not involved in illegal reprisals. Now we have a democracy, many issues are resolved in the courts, but they often either obediently do what is ordered, or give in to selfish aspirations. By doing this, the judicial system discredits itself.

Oddly enough, earlier, even in the most Hard times justice was more democratic. Thus, in the Supreme Court and in the Prosecutor General's Office, the highest officials systematically received citizens and their lawyers on complaints against decisions of lower courts. I could come to an appointment with the Deputy Chairman or the Chairman of the Supreme Court, explain my position and convince them of the need to review the case. Now this is impossible: you send a complaint, but you don’t know who it will get to, and it’s impossible to get an appointment at all. Under these conditions, it is much more difficult to achieve justice.

Previously, there were more fig leaves in judicial practice that created the appearance of legality, and thanks to this, in some cases it was sometimes possible to achieve a fair sentence. Whereas now they frankly spit on the observance of at least minimal formalities. Previously, it used to be that a judge was caught neglecting some procedure - and immediately the lawyer filed a cassation, the prosecutor brought a protest: it was impossible, rights were violated! And although the Constitution spoke least of all about human rights, nevertheless, obvious outrages were not allowed. There were almost no acquittals, but the dismissal of the case, the annulment of verdicts by higher courts - all this was possible. There was the Supreme Court of the USSR, and if you get there, you could get justice. The decisions of the Supreme Court of the USSR and its plenums were very good and gave the right direction.

In Russia, many shortcomings of the judicial system are not obvious at first glance. Most of our laws are not so bad, but their practical use sometimes turns them into opposites. For example, there is a law that a higher court does not have the right to increase the punishment determined by a lower court, but can only reduce it. But there is an account of marriage in the work of judges, and in accordance with it, any cancellation of the sentence is a marriage for which they are punished. How does the judge think? Take an article for which you can give from three to five years. Of course, the judge "just in case" will give the maximum so that the higher instance can only reduce the punishment, which does not require the annulment of the sentence. What happens? The law is good, but the accounting system encourages judges to pursue repressive policies. I don't think it's a coincidence.

In our judicial system, calculating something is a thankless task. Because sometimes everything is decided not according to the law, but under the influence of some incidental circumstances that I may not know about.

IN Soviet time the work of a lawyer was not easy: much was predetermined, but money in justice did not play such a role as it does now. Today, everything is bought, starting with condemnation and ending with justification.

I have never paid [investigators, prosecutors and judges] in my life. But I must say, such questions began to arise only in last years. I give you my word, I worked for decades and did not even imagine that investigators could take bribes.

In the Kalinin region, for example, with one of the investigators and an assistant prosecutor, we were close friends, as they say - one company. With Kim Golovakho, assistant prosecutor, during the trial we fought to the death. But I couldn't even imagine that before the case, somewhere in the company, one could say to Kim: "Listen, there will be a case tomorrow. So you ask for less." Yes, I'm sure if I allowed myself this, he would certainly have punched me in the face.

I could not imagine in a nightmare that I was giving a bribe from my client to the prosecutor or the judge. In those days [Padva talks about the beginning of his career. -" Pravo.Ru"] and no one had any money, so what kind of bribes are there. Later in Torzhok I defended the investigator who took it. But what did he take? A dozen eggs, a can of mushrooms. There was no systemic corruption then at all.

About fees

My very first fee is not money. I received a briefcase as a gift for helping my uncle write a complaint that helped him to complete rehabilitation.

I remember that a cassation complaint - the result of many days of work - cost [in the USSR] up to seven and a half. Conducting a case in court cost twenty rubles. The shortest time that can be spent on a case is three working days, or rather even four days for each case. Only twenty working days. So, five cases for twenty rubles. It turns out a steward per month. This is only what the client brings to the cashier. Of these hundred rubles, the lawyer received seventy in his hands - minus income tax. It was impossible to live on this money. Therefore, an additional agreement between lawyer and client flourished. The client paid. This, of course, was not encouraged. Perhaps some lawyers abused.

For some reason, we believe that the most expensive is the best. But this is not always the case. I am a man of the old school. I worked at a time when lawyers' fees were like alms to a beggar. Of course, I won’t work at such a rate now, but I can’t get used to the fact that you can easily take hundreds of thousands, millions from a client ... I’m not the most expensive lawyer. Besides, I have my own theory about this. It consists in the fact that it is not necessary to take as much from the client as possible. Because if you take too much, he will either hope too much, or even think that you are taking not only for yourself, but you will share with someone. As a result, you will fall into a psychological dependence on him. He can demand from you what you do not consider possible. It’s better to get a little short from him, let him think that he owes you, let him say to relatives and friends: “I thought Padva would take a million, but he took it like a god.” I then build other relationships with him, and this is more comfortable for me than an extra thousand or ten thousand.

In the matter of choosing a client for me, money has never played a decisive role. For me to get down to business, it must first of all be interesting. Much less often if the case causes public outcry. In this case, I generally take symbolic amounts. Friends often come to me, and I can not refuse. I do not want to present myself as an unmercenary. I get a lot. This provides me decent life.

I am fascinated by the legal story. Sometimes it fascinates me so much that I can get down to business for free. And sometimes poor people turn to me, from whom there is nothing to take, but I want to help. It happened several times. Journalists told about this, and now pensioners are overpowering me: “I heard that you do business for free ...” Yes, it happens. But I can't practice advocacy on a charitable basis. I work for free in exceptional cases. When it's very interesting. Or when I see that blatant injustice is happening.

About the role of a lawyer

We do not defend murderers, thieves, rapists, but citizens who are accused of this. And someone has to protect them. What if the investigation went wrong? The defender does not have the right to raise the question: is this person really guilty or not. He does not judge the defendant. He is obliged to do only one thing - to present to the court all the arguments in favor of this person. Society is interested in this, and without this there is no justice.

It is important to say that in relations with clients, we - lawyers - are not their judges. Neither formally, in terms of the question of their guilt and responsibility, nor humanly, in terms of good or bad person gave us his fate. Whatever our client is, we are obliged to defend him, we are obliged to defend his position and be critical of the accusations. Therefore, I deliberately always limit myself in assessing my client in terms of universal criteria of morality and morality. As for intellectual abilities - mind, education, then, of course, I take this into account in my relationship with the client.

When I accept an assignment for a new criminal case, I should not wonder whether a person is guilty or not. A citizen needs legal assistance, protection. And it is my human, professional and constitutional duty to provide this assistance. In addition, at this stage I can not get an answer to the question of whether the person is guilty or not. To do this, I must enter into the case, get to know him, but after that I no longer have the right to refuse protection.

When a person himself says that he is guilty, I must question this too and believe him only when I myself am convinced of this. If it turns out that the accused is still guilty, I am obliged to express my opinion on how his actions should be legally assessed and what punishment should be determined. The lawyer is obliged to present to the court all considerations mitigating the guilt of the client.

Many lawyers calmly admit: they say, of course, we are scammers. We undertake to protect people for money, even when we know that we cannot do anything. And they hang noodles on the ears of the client, they promise to do everything possible and impossible ... I try to be as frank as possible with the client. For example, in particularly difficult cases, I explain that very little will depend on me in this process. And even if he invites the best lawyers in the world, it is unlikely that anything will change. It's very cruel to say this, but honestly. As a rule, after such words, a person still does not refuse protection, otherwise he would feel doomed. And so he has hope.

You don't have to have an artistic temperament to be a good corporate lawyer. And to be a trial lawyer in civil and criminal cases, it is necessary, of course, to master the art of oratory, which is especially required in a jury trial. In turn, in order to successfully orate, you need to be a highly educated person, know music, literature, painting. It is necessary to visit port taverns, jostle among the public near the railway station, observe the life of the inhabitants of the social bottom, know the varieties of street and apartment hooliganism. Maybe sometimes you need to fight.

About clients

There are different clients. There are clients who disappear after their issue is resolved. And then, when they see you on the street, they pass to the other side. Others are grateful for the coffin of life. Somehow they express it. Not necessarily money. Attention, care, congratulations for the holidays. For example, when I was robbed, two or three clients came and tried to compensate for something from the stolen goods. One bought a VCR. Suddenly he called and said if he could come. I say yes. Bring a tape recorder. And it was like that. The case was successful, the man was released from prison. After that, he didn’t even appear, he didn’t say a kind word, not only didn’t thank him. And a few years later, suddenly, an acquaintance brings me to him: it is very necessary on business. I didn't even know to whom. And he turned out to be a prosperous businessman and gave me half of his business. Another thing is that in the future it did not bring me any dividends - one hassle.

With some clients I maintain good, comradely relations, but there are not very many of them. Some people do not like to remember the difficult moments of their lives, and a lawyer is a living reminder of such moments. They do not like to communicate with those to whom they owe something.

In my practice, I had to come into conflict with my own client. I once defended a guy who pleaded guilty to a crime. I did not believe him and sought to return the case for additional investigation. The defendant tried to refuse me, but it was too late. The court sent the case back to the prosecutor, and it turned out that the guy took the guilt of his father so that the punishment was more lenient.

I had a case when I was acutely, literally physiologically, unpleasant one person. Once we worked with him for a long time, and I had to feed him. He ate so much that I felt disgusted, I even had the feeling that there was some kind of animal in front of me. But I could not refuse his defense in any way, only if he himself wanted to change his lawyer.

About Me

[Being a lawyer] was a school dream. I imagined basically that the lawyer is a speaker. As a child I worked artistic reading, participated in competitions of reciters-performers.

I don't identify with anyone. I appreciate myself.

I think I a kind person I think I'm a gullible person, oddly enough. I think that I am an honest person. I think that I am a courageous person, if we talk about my merits. And if we talk about shortcomings, there are no less striking ones: I am terribly unassembled, I am terribly disorganized, I am terribly absent-minded, lazy.

I don't have an all-consuming hobby. I have several hobbies that go with me all my life - sometime in more, once in less. This is a passion for some sports. I loved and love football and tennis. I used to play both. In football, he even had a refereeing category, refereeing some matches. I still love football. Fan of "Spartak", a little bit of a fan, but not so much to go and sort things out with the fans of CSKA. But, in general, I love Spartak very much, now I'm worried: he plays poorly.

For Genrikh Pavlovich, such cases are those in which fundamentally important legal issues are raised and errors that have occurred in previous judicial practice are eliminated. After all, the results of these cases can subsequently save thousands of human lives. As an example, Genrikh Pavlovich likes to cite the case of Vladimir Grizak, who was accused of murder own wife and a young son, committed with particular cruelty. Vladimir's innocence was defended by Genrikh Pavlovich and his colleague A.E. Bochko. Their efforts turned into a complete justification and rehabilitation of Grizak, who spent 4 long years in prison. However, human rights activists did not stop there. In progress judicial trial they were able to give impetus to the search for an answer to the question of the fate of the death penalty as a legal institution. The fact is that Grizak was threatened with the death penalty for the crime imputed to him. According to Art.

Lawyer Padva Genrikh Pavlovich: biography, achievements and interesting facts

Senior Partner at Padva & Partners law firm.

Head of the Russian-American law firm Chadbourne and Park - and the Union of Lawyers.

Attention

Vice President International Union lawyers. Genrikh Pavlovich was born in Moscow in 1931.

After 22 years, he received a diploma from the Moscow Law Institute and became a member of the Bar Association.

Cavalier of the sign "Public recognition". Winner of the Gold Medal.

F. N. Plevako. Honored Lawyer of Russia. He is fond of collecting antique porcelain and painting.

Info

Most of all he likes to contemplate the paintings of El Greco, Utrillo and Natalia Nesterova.

Padva Genrikh Pavlovich

The Constitutional Court agreed with the lawyers’ point of view regarding the unconstitutionality of the current practice and ruled: until the advent of a law that would ensure the consideration by jurors of cases involving defendants under threat of the death penalty, the death penalty throughout Russia will not be imposed by any judicial instance of the country.

Thus, the lawyers managed to achieve not only a fair decision in respect of their client, but also a moratorium on the use of capital punishment.

No less significant can be called the case on the claim of G.
D., addressed to P. and the Ministry of Culture in connection with the belittling of the honor and dignity of the plaintiff.
Genrikh Pavlovich represented the interests of GD. In order to secure the claim, the lawyer filed a motion with the court to seize the defendant's property.

Among his favorite artists are Utrillo and El Greco.

He is also interested in the work of contemporary artists. In particular, he prefers the work of N. Nesterova.

• 20.06.2016

Read also

• Smolensky Alexander Pavlovich: biography, scandals, photos
• Kuzmichev Alexey Viktorovich: biography of an entrepreneur and interesting facts
• Teplukhin Pavel Mikhailovich: biography
• Billionaire Fetisov Gleb Gennadievich: biography, achievements and interesting facts
• Aven Peter Olegovich: biography, achievements and interesting facts
• Consumed marriage is a fact of a full-fledged relationship between spouses
• President and Chairman of the Board of Sberbank of Russia German Gref.

Heinrich Pavlovich padva

Criminal lawyer Vyacheslav Korolev Approximately RUB 300,000 Sterligov & Partners Law Firm RUB 200,000 Kalashnikov & Partners ICA RUB 150,000 Partner Bar Association Up to RUB 150,000 (prepayment of RUB 50,000) Lawyer Yury Nikonorov 100,000 - 150 000 rubles Krivitsky & Partners Law Office 100,000 rubles per month Moscow City Bar Association Kurganov & Partners from 100,000 rubles Komaev & Partners Moscow City Bar Association from 100,000 rubles Demin & Partners Law Office 100,000 rubles Legal Center "Man and Law" from 50,000 rubles (protection in court from 100,000 rubles) Moscow legal center"Vector" from 100,000 rubles ICA "Zheleznikov and Partners" from 100,000 rubles "Moscow Legal Bureau" 80,000 rubles (the court of first instance - 80,000 rubles) Lawyer Magomed Evloev As agreed.

Heinrich Padva spoke about his earnings.

He, recalling this process, says that some moments were often absurd. Sometimes the memory of a brilliant writer was simply mocked.

For example, on the part of officials, demands were made for the provision of documents confirming the fact that Ivinskaya had been donated handwritten poems dedicated to her. The side of the writer's daughter-in-law was defended by the lawyer Lyubarskaya. Under the protection of the ex-head of Yukos, M.

Khodorkovsky's lawyer also failed to get an acquittal.

Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev each received eight years in prison. Andrey Krainov (the head of the Volna company), who is involved in the same case, was sentenced to four and a half years probation.

High-ranking clients Padva Genrikh defended the interests of the ex-head of the Russian government Mikhail Kasyanov, who was involved as a witness in a case involving the Sosnovka property complex (former state dachas), sold to him and M.

Legal.report found out for the first time the real rates of Moscow lawyers

From 1953 to 1971, his place of work was the Kalinin Regional Bar Association.

For six months he trained in Rzhev, and later for more than a year he led a singular lawyer's practice in the district center, which is called Pogorely Gorodische.

Later he worked as a lawyer in the cities of Torzhok and Kalinin.

Since 1971, the biography of Heinrich Pavlovich Padva has been associated with the capital, he entered the Moscow City Bar Association.

In 1985, he became a member of its presidium and at the same time director of the Scientific Research Institute of the Bar, established by the Moscow Bar Associations. In 1989, Padva Genrikh was elected vice-president of the USSR Bar Union, and later in 1990 to a similar post in the International Bar Association (Union).

Padva Genrikh Pavlovich cost of services

Oral or written consultation - up to 5,000 rubles, preparation of legal documents - from 10,000 rubles, representation in court - from 50,000 rubles Legal company "Legal Support Center" By agreement, from 25,000 rubles Lawyer Sergei Romanovsky First oral consultation - 3,000 rubles. Further by agreement Law office "Reznik, Gagarin and partners" Refusal to take up the case with the wording "due to employment" Law office "Egorov, Puginsky, Afanasiev and partners" Do not deal with criminal cases related to drugs Law office "Barshchevsky and partners" They disclose information about the cost of services only during a face-to-face consultation with the client. Where do the numbers come from? Most lawyers agreed to justify their prices only during a face-to-face conversation. However, some gave extensive written explanations.
In particular, Kalashnikov and Partners, having initially requested 150,000 rubles for work during the preliminary investigation, said: “When the parents arrive, we can discuss the price.

But for that we need to know the details of the case.”

Interestingly, most lawyers, contrary to popular belief, did not try to "nightmare" the client in order to get the client at any cost. At most, it was about relatively harmless marketing moves.

So, in the legal company "Legal Support Center" they said that their services cost only 25,000 rubles.

However, after short negotiations, clarifications, clarifications, the lawyers admitted that we are talking about only about primary assistance to the accused. And then we need to negotiate. Another advertising tactic is used by lawyer Sergei Romanovsky, who immediately introduced himself as former employee FSB, who served in Moscow and St. Petersburg.
Ultimately, the case against Borodin was dropped. The head of the board of directors of KrAZ, Anatoly Bykov, was a defendant of a lawyer in 2000 and 2003.

He was given a suspended sentence. Entrepreneur Frank Elkaponi (Mamedov), who was accused of storing and transporting drugs, was acquitted by Pavda's efforts.

Pavda's clients were also Yukos organizer M. Khodorkovsky, actor Vladislav Galkin, ex-Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, criminal authority Vyacheslav Ivankov. Failures in business Biography of Heinrich Padva includes not entirely successful moments.

In the period from 1994 to 2001, the lawyer had to represent the side of Olga Ivinskaya, who was a friend of B.

Pasternak, at a lengthy lawsuit connected with the fate of the Pasternak archives.

This civil case ended unsuccessfully for the defendant Pavda.

Lawyer padva genrikh pavlovich cost of services

For example, the following answer came from the Partner Bar Association: “Hashish (hemp) is used as smoking mixture, common at student events. Preliminary investigation - up to 150 thousand rubles. We do not know how he was detained, if within the framework of the ORM, then we need to look at how they were carried out and look for flaws and violations, if any. We have extensive experience in this regard. You can make an advance payment, say, in the region of 50 thousand rubles for a meeting with the prisoner and the investigator. Then you can understand what, how and with what it is possible to help, and then talk about the final amount of the fee and additional payment ... It is necessary to decide on working with a lawyer who will be interested in the work, and “do not serve the number” as appointed from the investigation, you need to as soon as possible so as not to lose precious time in this situation.

By the way, you can bargain with almost all lawyers.