Tank Mk.III Valentine Engine. Weight. Dimensions. Armament. Lend-Lease tanks. Volumes and modifications Tank Valentine in the USSR

The 6-pounder left no room in the turret for either the coaxial BESA machine gun or the 2-inch breech-loading smoke grenade launcher. They tried to make up for the loss of the latter by installing two four-inch single-shot smoke grenade launchers on the right side of the tower.

To avoid the increase in mass, which was fatal for the remaining power plant, the British again went to reduce the thickness of the armor - up to 43 mm.

According to Vickers data, the production of Valentines with a 6-pounder gun began in December 1941. If so, the Valentine VIII was the first British tank armed with this gun, as the similarly equipped Churchill III and Crusader III left the factory floors in March and May 1942, respectively.

Valentine IX

Variant of the Valentine V tank with a 6-pounder gun in a two-man turret. On the last 300 machines of this modification, a forced diesel GMC 6004 with a power of 165 hp was installed. at 2000 rpm, which made it possible to slightly improve the dynamic characteristics of the tank, the mass of which reached 17.2 tons.

Infantry tanks Mk III at the NIBTPolygon in Kubinka. Above - Valentine IX, below - Valentine X

Valentine X

In February 1942, the Tank Board decided that the initiative to modernize the Valentine should be left entirely to Vickers. The fact is that the military already considered this combat vehicle unpromising, preferring the more powerful Churchill. Less than three months later, Vickers announced the creation of a new tank, called the Vampire, and designed to replace the Valentine. However, no documentation was presented at the same time, and the topic was soon closed, especially since the company was supposed to be widely involved in the program for the production of the A27 cruiser tank. However, the production of this machine was managed without Vickers, and therefore it was decided to continue the production of Valentine until the end of 1943.

On last step In production, the main model was the Valentine X. This vehicle was a late-production Valentine IX (with a 165 hp engine) equipped with an autonomous BESA machine gun mount to the right of the cannon. To accommodate the machine gun, it was necessary to reduce the ammunition load of the gun by nine shots. Despite the fact that during the tests the imbalance of the machine gun mount and the limited ammunition capacity of machine gun cartridges were revealed, from June 1943 brand new Valentine X began to come out of the factory shops.

Valentine XI

The last serial modification of the infantry tank Mk III. Soon after the launch of the Valentine X, it became obvious that instead of the 6-pounder, it was quite possible to install a 75-mm gun, the breech of which had almost the same dimensions and weight. Apart from the gun and the GMC 6004 engine boosted to 210 hp, the Valentine XI was almost identical to the previous version.

* * *

On April 14, 1944, the last Valentine tank out of 6,855 military vehicles made in the UK left the factory floor. In addition, from autumn 1941 to mid-1943, 1420 of these machines were produced in Canada. Hence, total"Valentines" is 8275 units. This is the most massive British tank of the Second World War.

Production was carried out within the framework of no less than 19 orders. All vehicles received the identification numbers of the British War Department (War Department - WD): 15946-16345, 16356-16555, 17360-17684, 18071 - 18095, 20419-20493, 27121 -27720, 32471 -32700, 32721 - 32970, 47098-47347 , 59684-60183, 66466-67865, 82163-82617, 120690-121149 and 121823-123632.

Valentine IX

Canadian tanks had numbers: 23204 - 23503, 40981 - 41430, 73554-74193 and 138916 - 138945. However, it cannot be said that all vehicles under these numbers were manufactured. There is also no way to give exact data on the number of produced cars of one or another modification (with the exception of the above), as well as indicate which numbers correspond to them. It is only known that the tanks of the Valentine II modification began with the WD number T16122, the Valentine III with the T66591, and the Valentine IV with the T47314. The numbers were applied with white paint on the sides of the hull or turret and, as a rule, are clearly visible in photographs, which makes it easier to identify combat vehicles. The tanks produced by Vickers also had the WD number stamped on a "company" cast plate riveted to the hull.

However, even in the strict statistics of the pedantic Englishmen, who numbered everything and everyone, there is confusion. So, for example, in a whole series of well-known photographs Valentine tanks I and Valentine II from the 16th Tank Brigade of the 1st Corps of the Polish Armed Forces in the West, combat vehicles carry the numbers WD T1290248, T1290295, etc. The origin of these seven-digit numbers is unknown to the author.

A story about the modernization of the Valentine tank would not be complete without mentioning two more combat vehicles that were being prepared to replace it. It's about the Vanguard project. This car, apparently, should be considered as a modification of the Valentine, since in the documents of those years it goes under the name Valentine-Vanguard. Combat weight the machine was 16.5 tons, armament - a 6-pounder gun and a coaxial BESA machine gun, a crew of 3 people. The tank was supposed to reach a speed of 8 km / h more than the "Valentines" latest models. Judging by the documents, this machine was tested in 1943, and they did not end well. In any case, nothing more is known about this tank, except that the individual components designed for it were used in the creation self-propelled gun archer.

The latest production version of the infantry tank Mk III - Valentine XI

Infantry tank A38 Valiant

In 1942 - 1943, the A38 Valiant tank began to be developed as a weighted version of the Valentine. Its mass is 27 tons, and the maximum thickness of the armor reached 112 mm. In the initial project, a 6-pounder gun was provided as the main armament, with the possibility of replacing it in the future with a 75-mm gun. The twin installation of a gun and a machine gun was located in a massive cast mask, which practically made up the entire front of a large three-man turret. The mask was attached to the welded turret with ten huge bolts with a bulletproof head. The increased weight of the tank required changes to the chassis. In 1944, two prototypes were built, differing from each other in the type of power plant and chassis. The Valiant 1 tank was equipped with an American GMC diesel engine with an HP 210 power. and undercarriage with six road wheels taken from Valentine (only large-diameter rollers were borrowed). Valiant 2 was equipped with a 450 hp Rolls-Royce Meteorite carburetor engine. and running gear from an experienced AZZ tank. The end of the war and the concentration of the work of the British tank industry on the creation of the Centurion tank put an end to the design of the Valiant.

Design description

LAYOUT the tank is classic with a stern transmission.

The department of management occupied the front of the car. It contained the driver's seat, controls, control panels, two six-volt batteries, a socket for starting the engine and recharging batteries from an external current source, a bell for signaling the driver from the stern of the tank, TPU, and internal lighting devices.

Tanks "VALENTINE" in parts of the Red Army

Not so long ago, when mentioning any equipment sent to the USSR under Lend-Lease, the authors always noted the insignificance of foreign supplies in comparison with domestic production, as well as the poor quality and archaic design of these samples. Now that the struggle against bourgeois falsifiers has successfully ended with the victory of the latter, it is possible to more or less objectively analyze the merits and demerits of individual models of armored vehicles of Anglo-American production, which were used in significant quantities in parts of the Red Army. This article is about English. light tank MK.III "Valentine", which became the most massive British armored vehicle used on the Soviet-German front, as well as in battles in the Far East.
MK.III "Valentine" (according to the documents of the Red Army "Valentine" or "Valentina") was developed by the company "" in 1938. Like the Matilda, it belonged to infantry tanks, but in terms of mass - 16 tons - it was rather light. True, at the same time, the thickness of the Valentine's armor was 60-65 mm, and the armament (depending on the modification) consisted of a 40-mm, 57-mm or 75-mm gun. On Valentine I, a 135 hp AEC carburetor was used, replaced in subsequent modifications by AEC and GMC diesel engines with a capacity of 131, 138 and 165 hp. tank was 34 km / h.
By Soviet standards, "Valentines" had an archaic design - armor plates were attached to the corners with rivets. Armored elements were installed, basically, almost vertically, without rational angles of inclination. However, "rational" armor was not always used on German vehicles - this approach significantly reduced the working internal volume of the tank, which affected the crew's performance. But on the other hand, all British cars were radio-equipped (radio station No. 19), and also had a diesel engine, which facilitated their operation along with Soviet models.
"Valentines" were produced from 1940 to the beginning of 1945 in 11 modifications, which differed mainly in armament and engine type. A total of 8275 tanks were manufactured by three British and two Canadian firms (6855 in England and 1420 in Canada). 2394 British and 1388 Canadian "Valentines" were sent to Sovietsky (a total of 3782 units), of which 3332 vehicles reached Russia. In the USSR, "Valentines" of seven modifications were supplied:
"Valentine II" - with a 42-mm cannon, AEC diesel engine, 131 hp. and an additional external fuel tank;
"Valentine III" - with a triple tower and a crew of four;
"Valentine IV" - "Valentine II" with a GMC diesel engine of 138 hp;
"Valentine V" - "Valentine III" with a GMC diesel engine of 138 hp;
"Valentine VII" - a Canadian version of the "Valentine IV" with a one-piece frontal hull and a coaxial 7.62-mm Browning machine gun (instead of the 7.92-mm BESA machine gun that was installed on English-made Valentines);
"Valentine IX" - "Valentine V" with a 57-mm cannon with a barrel length of 45 or 42 calibers, mounted in a two-man turret without a coaxial machine gun;
"Valentine X" - "Valentine IX" with a 57-mm cannon with a barrel length of 45 or 42 calibers (most likely a typo. Further in the text - 52 calibers. A.A.), coaxial with a machine gun and a GMC engine with a power of 165 l .With.
In addition to the main modifications of the "Valentine", in 1944 the Red Army also received the Mk.III "Valentine-bridgelayer" (Valentine-Bridgelaer) - in Soviet terminology "Mk.ZM". Perhaps the Canadian version of "Valentine" (modification VII) was even more reliable and technically more advanced than its English predecessor. Canadian "Valentines" were supplied to the Red Army from 1942 to 1944, with the bulk of the deliveries occurring in 1943. The most massive modifications in the Red Army were "Valentine IV" and its Canadian counterpart "Valentine VII", as well as the main version of the final period of the war - "Valentine IX". Moreover, the IX was delivered to the Soviet Union mainly with an artillery system having a barrel length of 52 calibers, while in the British army models with a barrel length of 45 calibers were used. "XI" with a 75-mm cannon was not supplied to the USSR.
It should be noted that the designation system for British armored vehicles was quite complex and cumbersome. First, the index assigned to the tank by the Ministry of War was indicated (Mk.II, Mk.III, Mk.IV, etc.), then came the name of the vehicle ("Valentine", "Matilda", "Churchill", etc.) and indicated by her (in Roman numerals). Thus, the full designation of the tank could look like this; Mk.III "Valentine IX", Mk.IV " Churchill III", etc. To avoid confusion, we will use the notation English tanks, adopted in the Red Army during the war: the name with the modification, for example: "Valentine IV", "Valentine IX", etc., or without the modification, for example: Mk.III "Valentine".
During the four years of the war, foreign-made armored vehicles received various compounds, subdivided | divisions and parts of the armored forces of the Red Army. Therefore, there were many reports on their operational and combat characteristics. Moreover, the assessment of the same vehicle by the middle and senior command staff often did not coincide with the opinion of the tank crew. This is understandable, the command was primarily worried tactical characteristics equipment - armament, speed on the march, cruising range, etc. - and for the crew, ease of operation, placement of units and the possibility of quick repairs, as well as other parameters of a domestic and technical nature, were important. The combination of these two points of view largely determined the presented sample of armored vehicles.
In addition, the foreign one was designed with the expectation of a higher culture of production and operation. In many ways, it was the technical illiteracy of the crews, the lack of units needed for maintenance that became the reasons for the failure of allied equipment. However, the "chasm" of the gap was not so great, and our tankers very soon got used to foreign vehicles, modifying many of them to suit the specifics of operation on the Soviet-German front.
The first "Valentines" appeared in parts of our active army at the end of November 1941, albeit in small numbers. In this case, only a part of the received 145 Matildas, 216 Valentines and 330 Universals was used. So, on the Western Front on 01/01/1942 "Valentines" were part of the 146th (2-T-34, 10-T-60, 4-Mk.Sh), 23rd (1-T-34, 5 Mk. .III) and 20th (1-T-34, 1-T-26, 1-T-, 60, 2-Mk.Sh, 1-BA-20) tank brigades operating in battle formations 16, 49 and 3rd Army, as well as as part of the 112th TD (1-KV, 8-T-26, 6-Mk.Sh and 10-T-34), attached to the 50th Army. The 171st separate tank battalion, also equipped with Valentines (10-T-60, 12-Mk.II, 9-Mk.III), fought on the North-Western Front (4th Army).
German documents of the 4th tank group note the fact of the first use of English tanks "Type 3" (MK.III "Valentine". - Approx. Aut.) against 2 tank division November 25, 1941 in the Peshki area. The document stated: "For the first time, German soldiers were faced with the fact of real help from England, about which Russian propaganda was screaming for so long. English tanks are much worse than Soviet ones. The crews that the German soldiers took prisoner scold "the old tin boxes that the British handed them to them."
Judging by this report, it can be assumed that the crews of the Valentines had a very limited training period and did not know the English materiel well. In units of the 5th army, which covered the Mozhaisk direction, the first unit to receive "inotanks" was the 136th separate tank battalion (otb). The battalion completed its formation on December 1, 1941, having ten T-34 tanks, ten T-60 tanks, nine Valentines and three Matildas (English tanks were received in Gorky on November 10, 1941, tankers were trained directly on front). By December 10, during the training of the crews, five Valentines, two Matildas, one T-34 and four T-60s were broken. After bringing the materiel in order, December 15, 1911 136 otb. was attached to the 329th Rifle Division (SD). Then, together with the 20th tank brigade, he participated in the counteroffensive near Moscow.
On January 15, 1942, the battalion command compiled a "Brief Report on the Actions. Mk.Sh" - apparently, documents with an assessment of the Allied equipment:
"The experience of using "Valentines" showed:
1. Tanks passability in winter conditions is good, movement is ensured on soft snow 50-60 cm thick. Grip with the ground is good, but spurs are needed when icy conditions.
2. The weapon operated flawlessly, but there were cases of undershot guns (the first five or six shots), apparently due to the thickening of the lubricant. The weapon is very demanding on lubrication and maintenance.
3. Observation in devices and slots is good.
4. The motor group and worked well up to 150-200 hours, then there is a decrease in engine power.
5. Armor good quality.
The personnel of the crews passed special training and tanks owned satisfactorily. The command and technical staff of the tanks knew little. A great inconvenience was created by the crews' ignorance of the elements of preparing tanks for winter. As a result of the lack of necessary heating, the cars hardly started in the cold and therefore kept hot all the time, which led to a large consumption of motor resources. In battle with German tanks(12/20/1941) three "Valentines" received the following damage: one had a turret jammed by a 37-mm projectile, the other had a cannon, the third received five hits on the side from a distance of 200-250 meters. In this battle, "Valentines" knocked out two medium German tanks T-3.
In general, Mk.Sh is a good combat weapon. powerful weapons, good maneuverability, capable of acting against manpower, fortifications and enemy tanks.
Negative sides:
1. Poor grip of the tracks with the ground.
2. Great vulnerability of the suspension bogies - if one roller fails, it cannot move. There are no high-explosive fragmentation shells for the gun."
Apparently, the latter circumstance was the reason for the order State Committee Defense on the rearmament of "Valentine" with a domestic artillery system. This task and in a short time was carried out at the plant number 92 by the design bureau under the leadership of Grabin. In December 1941, for two weeks, one "Valen-Tyne" was armed with a 45-mm tank gun and a DT machine gun. This machine received the factory index ZIS-95. At the end of December, the tank was sent to Moscow, but things did not go beyond the prototype.
A large number of tanks "Valentine" participated in the battle for the Caucasus. In general, the North Caucasian Front in the period 1942-1943 had a very significant "share" of Anglo-American tanks - up to 70% of the total number of vehicles. This situation was explained primarily by the proximity of the front to the Iranian channel for supplying the Red Army with equipment and weapons, as well as the convenience of transporting tanks along the Volga that arrived in the northern ports of the USSR.
Of the armored units of the North Caucasian Front, the 5th Guards Tank Brigade was considered the most eminent and experienced. fighting in the Caucasus, the brigade began on September 26, 1942, covering the Grozny direction to the Malgobek, Ozernaya area (at that time the brigade had 40 Valentines, three T-34s and one BT-7). On September 29, the brigade counterattacked the German units in the Alkhanch-Urt valley. In this battle, the crew of Captain Shenelkov's Guards destroyed five tanks, one self-propelled gun, a truck and 25 soldiers on their "Valentine". 15 for the next few days, fighting in the area continued. In total, during the fighting in the Malgobek area, the brigade destroyed 38 tanks (of which 20 burned down), one self-propelled guns, 24 guns, six mortars, one six-barreled mortar, up to 1800 enemy soldiers. The losses of the brigade amounted to two T-34s, 33 Valentines (of which eight burned down, the rest were evacuated and restored), 268 people were killed and wounded.
Returning to the use of the Valentine tank on the Soviet-German front, we can say that our commanders found the right decision- began to use these tanks in a complex, together with Soviet equipment. In the first echelon (according to the documents of 1942) there were tanks KV and "Matilda CS;" (with a 76.2-mm howitzer), in the second echelon T-34, and in the third "Valentine" and T-70. This tactic has often yielded positive results. An example of this is the reconnaissance in force of the fire system of the German defensive zone in the North Caucasus - the Blue Line.
Forces from the 56th Army were involved in the attack: the 5th Guards Tank Brigade (as of 1.08. 1C), as well as a battalion of the 417th Infantry Division.
Exactly at six o'clock in the morning on August 6, 1943, a volley of Katyushas was fired at the Gorno-Vesely farm (the Object of attack), and immediately behind the fire shaft, three KV-1S rushed forward, followed by three "Valentines" under the command of the guard senior lieutenant G. P. Polosina. The infantry moved behind the slippers. Further, it is interesting to cite the memoirs of G.P. Polosin, a participant in the battle:
“Tacking among the shell bursts (thirty-minute artillery preparation, of course, did not fully suppress the enemy fire system), my Valentine suddenly found itself literally in front of the farmhouse houses. That’s luck! But how are the other tanks? ..
I looked around through the peepholes. I saw that two more "Englishmen" of my platoon - the cars of Poloznikov and Voronkov - were walking a little behind. But heavy HF is not visible. Maybe they fell behind or took it aside: The infantry, of course, was cut off from the tanks even earlier ...
Destroying enemy machine-gun emplacements and bunkers along the way, our tanks reached the hollow. Stopped here. I gave the order over the radio:
- Don't shoot without my order! Save your projectiles. It is still unknown how much it will take like this ... And then to get through to your own ...
The tank commanders answered shortly:
-Understood.
Then he tried to contact the commander of the guard company, Senior Lieutenant Maksimov. And I couldn't. The ether was filled to the limit with hysterical commands on German. Apparently, the Nazis were seriously worried about the unexpected breakthrough of Russian tanks in this sector of their defense.
But our position was unenviable. It just so happened that they broke away from the main group conducting reconnaissance in force, and the fuel was running out, alone behind enemy lines, which, however, had not yet fully understood the situation, but this was a matter of time.
Having crushed a German anti-tank gun along the way, our tank jumped out of the hollow into the open space and saw a strange picture. On Voronkov's car, which was 30-40 meters to the right, there were Germans. They mistook "Valentines" for their equipment, pounded their butts on the armor and did not understand why the tankers did not get out. After waiting until the Germans had accumulated up to a dozen people, I ordered to hit them with a machine gun. Then, firing from smoke grenade launchers (this is where this weapon, which was only on British tanks, came in handy) and, having installed a smoke screen, the vehicles returned through the same hollow to the location of their troops. Near Gorno-Vesely, the battle was still going on. HF were hit. One of them stood without a tower. Another a little farther from him buried his cannon in the ground. At its right, flattened caterpillar, two tankers fired their pistols from the advancing Germans. Having dispersed the enemy infantry with fire from cannons and machine guns, we dragged both wounded into our "Valentine". It immediately became clear that, having failed to penetrate the armor of the KV with anti-tank artillery, the Germans used guided mines against them.
During this short raid behind enemy lines, a platoon of guards senior lieutenant G.P. Polosin destroyed five anti-tank guns, crushed five bunkers, 12 machine guns, shot up to a hundred Nazis. But most importantly, with his unexpected blow from the rear, he forced the enemy to fully open his fire system. Which is exactly what was needed.
It remains to add that all the crew members of Polosin's platoon were awarded government awards for this. Personally, Georgy Pavlovich Polosin received the Order of the Red Star.
In the 196th Tank Brigade (30th Army of the Kalinin Front), which participated in the capture of the city of Rzhev, in August 1942, steel plates were welded onto each of the Valentine tank tracks, increasing the track area. Shod in such "bast shoes", the car did not fall through in the snow and did not get stuck in marshy ground middle lane Russia. Mk.IIIs were actively used in positional battles on the Western and Kalinin fronts until the beginning of 1944. For mobility and maneuverability "Valentine" was very fond of cavalrymen. Until the end of the war, "Valentine IV" and its further development "Valentine IX and X" remained the main tank of the cavalry corps. As the main drawback, the cavalrymen noted the absence of high-explosive fragmentation shells for the cannon. And one more thing: it was not recommended to make sharp turns on the "Valentine", since at the same time the sloth's crank bent and the caterpillar jumped off.
By the end of the war, modifications of the Valentine IX and X (along with the American Sherman) were the only types of tanks that the USSR continued to request for supplies to the Red Army. For example, as of June 22, 1944, the 5th Guards Tank Army (3rd Belorussian Front) had 39 Valentine IX tanks, and the 3rd Cavalry Corps had 30 Valentine III tanks. These vehicles completed their military career in the Far East in August-September 1945. The 1st Far Eastern Front included 20 bridge tanks Mk.III Valentine-Bridgelayer, the 2nd Far Eastern Front included 41 Valentine III and IX (267th Tank Regiment) and another 40 Valentine IV were in the ranks of the horse -mechanized group of the Trans-Baikal Front.
Attached to tank brigades by armies 15 and 16, tank-bridge companies (10 Mk.IIIM each) marched along with tanks, but were not used, since tanks and self-propelled guns overcame small rivers and streams themselves, and large obstacles (over 8 m) were not Mk.IIIM could be provided.
The Canadian tanks "Valentine IV" in Soviet terminology were also designated as "Mk.III", so it is quite difficult to determine where the English tanks are and where the Canadian tanks are. Several cars "Valentine VII" took part in the liberation of the Crimea. The 19th Perekop tank corps had the 91st separate motorcycle battalion, which had a Valentine VII tank, ten BA-64s, ten Universal armored personnel carriers and 23 motorcycles.
However, this does not detract from the Canadian share of deliveries to the USSR. After all, almost half of the Valentines delivered were Canadian-made. These tanks, along with British products, participated in many operations of the Great Patriotic War.
One example of the use of Canadian vehicles was the battle of the 139th tank regiment of the 68th mechanized brigade of the 5th mechanized corps of the 5th army to capture the village of Devichye Pole in November 1943. 139 TP (68 Mbr, 8 Mk, 5 Army) entered the operational subordination of the 5 Army on November 15, 1943. With 20 T-34 tanks and 18 Valentine VII tanks, the regiment was fully equipped and was not used in battles until November 20. After the preparation of the materiel for the battles was completed, on November 20, 1943, in cooperation with the 57th Guards Tank Breakthrough Regiment, armed with KV and T-34 vehicles, and the infantry of the 110th Guards Rifle Division, the tanks of the 139th TP went forward. , the attack was carried out on high speeds(up to 25 km / h) with a landing of machine gunners (up to 100 people) and with anti-tank guns attached to tanks. 30 Soviet tanks participated in this operation. The enemy did not expect such a massive swift blow and could not offer effective resistance to the advancing units. When the first line of defense was broken, the infantry dismounted and, having unhooked their guns, began to occupy enemy positions, preparing to repel a possible counterattack. The remaining units of the 110th Guards Rifle Division were brought into the breach. However, the German counterattack did not take place, the German command was so stunned by the Soviet breakthrough that they could not organize resistance during the day. During this day, our troops went 20 km into the depths of the German defense and captured the Maiden's Field, while losing 4 tanks (KV,

In early 1938, the British War Office offered Vickers-Armstrong Ltd. take part in the production of the infantry tank Mk. II or develop a combat vehicle of its own design according to similar tactical and technical requirements. The drawings of the new combat vehicle were submitted to the Ministry of War on February 10, 1938, and its full-size model was made by March 14, but the military was not satisfied with the double tower, and for a whole year they thought about whether to accept the project or not. The deteriorating situation in Europe contributed to the fact that on April 14, 1939, an order was issued for the first series of tanks. The contract, signed in June - July of the same year, provided for the supply of 625 Valentines to the British army. Two more firms were involved in their production: Metropolitan- Cammell Carriage and Wagon Co. Ltd. and Birmingham Railway Carriage and Wagon Co. Ltd. In June 1940, the first production tanks.

Infantry tank "Valentine II" at the NIIBT Polygon in Kubinka. 1947

Infantry tank "Valentine" had a classic layout with rear drive wheels. The main feature of the hull and turret design is the absence of frames for their assembly. The armor plates were processed according to the corresponding templates so that they were mutually closed during assembly. Then the plates were fastened to each other with bolts, rivets and dowels. Tolerances when fitting various parts did not exceed 0.01 inches.

The driver's seat was located in the center of the front of the tank. For landing and disembarking, he had at his disposal two hatches with hinged covers. Two more crew members - the gunner and the commander (he is also the loader and radio operator) - were located in the tower. In its frontal part, a 2-pounder gun and a 7.92-mm BESA machine gun coaxial with it were installed in a cast mask. To their right, in a separate mask, is a 50-mm smoke grenade launcher. The armament was supplemented by a 7.69 mm Bren machine gun on anti-aircraft installation Lakeman on the roof of the tower. At the rear of the tower were radio station No. 11 or No. 19 and a special opening for ventilation. On the walls of the rotating polik fighting compartment the tower housed ammunition - 60 shots and 3150 rounds of ammunition (14 boxes of 225 pieces each) for the BESA machine gun; the seats of the crew members were also attached to the floor. Ammunition for the Bren anti-aircraft machine gun - 600 rounds (6 disk magazines) - was in a box on the rear outer wall of the turret. 18 smoke grenades were intended for the grenade launcher.

An engine with power, lubrication, cooling and electrical equipment was installed in the spacious engine compartment. To the right of the engine is an oil filter and two batteries, and to the left is the fuel tank. The engine compartment was closed from the fighting compartment with removable shutters. To access the engine units, the armor plates of the roof of the engine compartment were hinged.

The transmission compartment contained a cooling system tank, two radiators, a single-disk main dry friction clutch, a five-speed gearbox, a transverse gear, two multi-disk dry clutches, semi-rigid connections of the final clutches with final drives and an oil tank.

Chassis each side consisted of six rubber-coated road wheels, interlocked by three into two balancing carts with special springs and hydraulic shock absorbers; drive wheel with removable ring gear and two rubber tires; idler wheel with tensioner and three rubberized support rollers. There were 103 tracks in the caterpillar chain, and their engagement was lantern, in the middle of the track.

Infantry MK III tank"Valentine IX" at the training ground in Kubinka.

Tanks "Valentine" were produced in 11 modifications, differing in brand and type of engine, turret design and armament. The Valentine I variant was the only one equipped with a 135 hp AEC A189 carburetor engine. Starting with the Valentine II model, only diesel engines were installed on the tank, first AEC A190 with a capacity of 131 hp. from, then, to Valentine IV, - the American GMC 6004, throttled to a power of 138 hp. Since the tankers complained about the congestion of the two crew members stationed in the turret, a three-man turret was installed on the III and V options, increasing the volume of the standard one due to the forward mask new form. However, the new turret was too crowded for three tankers, and such an improvement turned out to be of little use. With a common identity, the "troika" and "five" differed from each other only in the brand of the engine - AEC A190 and GMC 6004, respectively. The mass of the tank increased by exactly one ton and reached 16.75 tons.

Before a rally on the occasion of the transfer of the first British tanks to the Soviet Union. Birmingham, 28 September 1941.

In the fall of 1941, the production of "Valentine" unfolded in Canada, at the plant of the Montreal company Canadian Pacific Co. Until the middle of 1943, 1420 tanks of modifications "VI" and "VII" were manufactured here, which almost did not differ from the "Valentine IV". The only difference was the brand of the coaxial machine gun: on Valentine VI - BESA, and on Valentine VII - Browning М1919А4. Some of the Canadian-made machines had a cast frontal part of the hull.

In an effort to increase the firepower of the tank, the British installed a 6-pounder gun on the Valentine VIII. At the same time, the number of crew members in the tower was again reduced to two. The course machine gun was also eliminated, which reduced the tank's firepower.

The Valentine IX variant was identical to its counterpart, with the exception of the brand of the power plant: it had a GMC 6004 diesel engine, and the VIII had an AEC A190.

The coaxial machine gun was returned to Valentine X. And due to the fact that the mass of the tank with a 6-pounder gun increased to 17.2 tons, a GMC 6004 diesel engine with a power of 165 hp was installed on the "top ten". The 6-pounder guns were of two modifications: the Mk III with a barrel length of 42.9 calibers and the Mk V with a barrel length of 50 calibers. Ammunition was reduced to 58 rounds.

The last modification of "Valentine", supplied to the Soviet Union, was "Valentine X".

The latest modification - "Valentine XI" - was armed with a 75-mm cannon. At the same time, the coaxial machine gun was again removed - there was simply nowhere to put it. This version was equipped with a GMC 6004 engine, boosted to 210 hp.

On April 14, 1944, the last Valentine tank out of 6,855 military vehicles made in the UK left the factory floor. In addition, from the autumn of 1941 to the middle of 1943, 1420 of these machines were produced in Canada. Therefore, the total number of "valentines" is 8275 units. This is the most massive British tank of the Second World War.

The only country where Valentines were supplied under Lend-Lease was the Soviet Union. Moreover, almost half of the produced vehicles were sent to the USSR: 2394 English and 1388 Canadian, of which 3332 tanks reached their destination.

According to the selection committees of the GBTU of the Red Army, in 1941, 216 tanks were accepted, in 1942 - 959, in 1943-1776, in 1944 - 381. The Red Army received tanks of seven modifications - II, III, IV, V, VII, IX and X. As you can see, cars equipped with GMC diesels prevailed. Perhaps this was done for the sake of unification: the same engines were on the Shermans supplied to the USSR. In addition to line tanks, 25 Valentine-Bridgelayer bridgelayers - the Soviet designation MK.ZM - were delivered. In the documents of the war years, "valentines" are called differently. Most often MK.III or MK.3, sometimes with the addition of the name "Valentine" or, more rarely, "Valentine". It is not often possible to come across the designation of the modification “Valentine III”, “Valentine IX”, etc. However, in the documents of those years, in addition to MK-3, the designations MK-5, MK-7, MK-9 come across. It is quite obvious that we are talking about various modifications of this British tank.

The first "Valentines" appeared on the Soviet-German front at the end of November 1941. In the 5th Army, which was defending in the Mozhaisk direction, the 136th separate tank battalion became the first unit to receive combat vehicles of this type. It was formed by December 1, 1941, and included ten T-34s, ten T-60s, nine Valentines and three Matildas. The battalion received English tanks in Gorky only on November 10, 1941, so the tankers were trained directly at the front. On December 15, the 136th separate tank battalion was attached to the 329th rifle division, and then to the 20th tank brigade, together with which it participated in the counteroffensive near Moscow. As in the case of the Matilda, already during the first battles, such a lack of English tanks was revealed as the absence of high-explosive fragmentation shells in the ammunition load of the 2-pounder gun. The latter circumstance was the reason for the GKO's order to re-equip Valentine with a domestic artillery system. This task was carried out in a short time at plant number 92 in Gorky. On the machine, which received the factory index ZIS-95, a 45-mm cannon and a DT machine gun were installed. At the end of December 1941, the tank was sent to Moscow, but things did not go beyond the prototype.

Tank MK-III "Valentine" is moving to the front line. Battle for Moscow, January 1942.

A large number of "valentines" participated in the battle for the Caucasus. In 1942–1943, almost 70% of the tank units of the North Caucasian and Transcaucasian fronts were equipped with imported equipment. This was due to the proximity to the so-called "Persian Corridor" - one of the routes for the delivery of goods to the USSR, passing through Iran. But even among the troops of the North Caucasian Front, the 5th Guards Tank Brigade stood out, whose tankers from mid-1942 to September 1943 mastered five types of vehicles: Valentine, MZl, MZs, Sherman and Tetrarch, and this apart from domestic technology!

The brigade began combat operations in the North Caucasus on September 26, 1942 in the Grozny direction in the Malgobek-Ozernaya area. At that time, the brigade had 40 Valentines, three T-34s and one BT-7. On September 29, tankers attacked German troops in the Alkhanch-Urt valley. In this battle, the crew of Captain Shepelkov's guards on their "Valentine" destroyed five tanks, a self-propelled gun, a truck and 25 enemy soldiers. In total, over several days of fighting in this area, the 5th Guards Tank Brigade destroyed 38 tanks (20 of them burned down), one self-propelled unit, 24 guns, six mortars, one six-barreled mortar and up to 1800 enemy soldiers. Our losses amounted to two T-34s and 33 "Valentines" (of which eight burned down, and the rest were evacuated from the battlefield and restored), 268 people were killed and wounded.

"Valentine II" in ambush. Battle for Moscow, January 1942.

Tank MK-III "Valentine VII" of the 52nd Red Banner Tank Brigade is heading to the front line. A white rhombus is clearly visible on the tower - the tactical sign of the 52nd brigade. Transcaucasian Front, November 1942.

Canadian tank "Valentine VII" from the 52nd Red Banner Tank Brigade, shot down near the city of Alagir. North Caucasus, November 3, 1942. In addition to the number of the military department, clearly visible on the turret, the belonging of this machine to the modification "Valentine VII" can be judged by the barrel of the coaxial Browning machine gun and the cast frontal part of the hull.

Working out the interaction of tanks and infantry. 1942

Since most of the brigades that were armed with imported equipment were distinguished by a mixed composition, the most correct solution was already found in 1942 - to use domestic and foreign tanks in a complex, so that they complement each other in terms of their combat qualities. So, in the first echelon there were tanks KB and "Matilda" CS with a 76-mm howitzer, in the second - T-34, and in the third - "Valentines" and T-70. This tactic has often yielded positive results.

The 5th Guards Tank Brigade acted in a similar way during the battles to break through the "Blue Line" - the German defensive line in the North Caucasus in 1943. Then, in addition to the forces of the brigade (13 M4A2, 24 Valentine, 12 T-34), the 14th Guards Tank Regiment of the breakthrough (16 KB-1C) was involved in the attack, and battle formations managed to build it in such a way that ultimately contributed to the success of the battle. However, in this regard, it will be interesting to get acquainted with the memoirs of G. P. Polosin, a participant in this battle:

“Tacking among shell explosions (thirty-minute artillery preparation, of course, did not fully suppress the enemy fire system), my Valentine suddenly found himself literally in front of the houses of the farm (Gorno-Vesely. - Note. author). That's luck! But how are the other tanks? ..

I looked around through the peepholes. I saw that two more "Englishmen" of my platoon - the cars of Poloznikov and Voronkov - were walking a little behind. But heavy KB is not visible. Maybe they fell behind or took aside ... The infantry, of course, was cut off from the tanks even earlier ...

Destroying enemy machine-gun emplacements and bunkers along the way, our platoon tanks entered the hollow. Stopped here. I gave the order over the radio:

Do not shoot without my order! Save your projectiles. It is not yet known how much it will take like this ... And then to get through to your own ...

The tank commanders answered briefly: they understood.

Then he tried to contact the commander of the guard company, Senior Lieutenant Maksimov. And I couldn't. The broadcast was filled to the limit with hysterical commands in German. Apparently, the Nazis were seriously worried about the unexpected breakthrough of Russian tanks in this sector of their defense.

But our position was unenviable. It just so happened that the main group, conducting reconnaissance in force, broke away, ammunition and fuel were running out, alone behind enemy lines, which, however, had not yet fully understood the situation, but this was a matter of time.

Having crushed a German anti-tank gun along the way, our tank jumped out of the hollow into the open space and saw a strange picture. On Voronkov's car, which was 30–40 meters to the right, there were Germans. They mistook Valentines for their equipment, pounded their butts on the armor and did not understand why the tankers did not get out. After waiting until the Germans had accumulated up to a dozen people, I ordered to hit them with a machine gun. Then, firing from smoke grenade launchers (this is where this weapon, which was only on British tanks, came in handy) and setting up a smoke screen, the vehicles returned through the same hollow to the location of their troops. Around Gorno-Vesely, the battle was still going on. The KB tanks were knocked out. One of them stood without a tower. Another a little farther from him buried his cannon in the ground. At his right flattened caterpillar, two tankers fired back from pistols from the Germans who were pressing. Having dispersed the enemy infantry with fire from cannons and machine guns, we dragged both wounded into our Valentine. It immediately became clear that, having failed to penetrate the armor of the KB with anti-tank artillery, the Germans used guided mines against them.

A very interesting episode. It is worth paying attention to one essential detail: the successful actions of the platoon are largely due to the presence of reliable radio communications between the vehicles. Which is not surprising, because radio stations were installed on all Lend-Lease tanks without exception!

"Valentine" lined up on the Eastern Front. Army Group Center, February 1942.

Another example of the use of such tactics was the battle of the 139th tank regiment of the 68th mechanized brigade of the 5th mechanized corps of the 5th army for capturing the village of Devichye Pole in November 1943. The regiment had 20 T-34 tanks and 18 Valentine VII tanks. On November 20, 1943, in cooperation with the 56th Guards Tank Regiment of the breakthrough, which was armed with KB and T-34, and the infantry of the 110th Guards Rifle Division, the tanks of the 139th Tank Regiment went forward. The attack was carried out at high speeds (up to 25 km / h) with a landing of submachine gunners on the armor and with anti-tank guns attached to the tanks. In total, 30 Soviet combat vehicles were involved in the operation. The enemy did not expect such a swift and massive strike and could not offer effective resistance. After breaking through the first line of enemy defense, the infantry dismounted and, having unhooked their guns, began to take up positions, preparing to repel a possible counterattack. The remaining units of the 110th Guards Rifle Division were brought into the breach. However, there was no German counterattack - the German command was so stunned by the actions of the Soviet troops that they could not organize a counterattack for a day. During this time, our troops advanced 20 km into the depths of the German defense and captured the Maiden Field, while losing one KB, one T-34 and two Valentines!

The geography of the use of "Valentines" was very wide - from the southernmost sections of the Soviet-German front to the northern ones. In addition to units of the Transcaucasian Front, they were, for example, in service with the 19th Tank Corps of the Southern Front (from October 20, 1943 - the 4th Ukrainian Front) and took an active part in the Melitopol offensive operation, and then in the liberation of Crimea. MK.III tanks were actively used in positional battles on the Western and Kalinin fronts until the beginning of 1944. It should be noted that in many military units, imported tanks were modified mainly in order to increase their cross-country ability on snow and swampy ground. For example, in the 196th Tank Brigade of the 30th Army of the Kalinin Front, which participated in the capture of the city of Rzhev in August 1942, steel plates were welded to each track, increasing its area.

Until the end of the war, "Valentines" remained the main tanks of the cavalry corps. The cavalrymen especially appreciated the maneuverability of the vehicle. Most likely, for the same reason, "Valentines" were in service with many motorcycle battalions and individual motorcycle regiments. The staff of the latter at the final stage of the war included a tank company of ten T-34s or the same number of Valentine IX.

"Valentine" on the right bank of the Dniester. 1943

Tanks "Valentine V" (with triple tower) on the march. 1st Belorussian Front, 1944.

"Valentine VII", lined with German anti-tank artillery. Vitebsk region, January 1944.

A column of "Valentines" on the outskirts of Baranovichi. In the foreground is Valentine V. Belarus, 1944.

Tanks of modifications "Valentine IX" and "Valentine X", armed with 57-mm guns, along with "Shermans", almost until the end of the war, continued to be requested by the Soviet Union for Lend-Lease supplies. Largely due to this, the mass production of "Valentines", which were no longer entering the british army, continued to be maintained until April 1944.

In the Red Army, Valentines were used until the end of World War II. So, for example, in the 5th Guards Tank Army of the 3rd Belorussian Front on June 22, 1944, there were 39 Valentine IX tanks, and in the 3rd Cavalry Corps - 30 Valentine III units. Tanks "Valentine IX" were in service with the 1st Mechanized Corps of the 2nd Guards Tank Army during the Vistula-Oder offensive operation in the winter of 1945. Combat vehicles of this type completed their combat path in the Red Army in the Far East in August 1945. As part of the 2nd Far Eastern Front, the 267th tank regiment fought (41 "Valentine III" and "Valentine IX"), in the ranks of the cavalry-mechanized group of the Trans-Baikal Front there were 40 tanks "Valentine IV", and, finally, as part of 1- On the Far Eastern Front, there were two tank-bridge companies with i0 Valentine-Bridgelayer bridgelayers in each.

It is rather difficult to find a more or less complete assessment of the Valentine tank in foreign literature. Too limited in time and scope was its operation in the British army. Basically, it is noted that the tankers praised the tank for its reliability, and scolded it for the tightness of the fighting compartment and the absence of high-explosive fragmentation shells in the ammunition of 2- and 6-pounder guns.

Since several thousand combat vehicles of this type fought on the Soviet-German front, in extremely harsh operating conditions, we will try to analyze the reviews given to Valentine by Soviet tankers. True, for the reasons already mentioned, this will not be easy to do. Evaluations in an exclusively negative way could not be avoided by memoirs either. A typical example of a biased and controversial assessment of the Valentine tank can be found in the memoirs of Major General A. V. Kazaryan.

On the eve of the events described in the spring of 1942, he completed his studies in the 38th Tank Training Regiment. In June, he arrived in the 196th tank brigade as a tank commander. Here is an excerpt from his memoirs.

What can be said about this episode? The young commander, who had just completed an accelerated (4–5 months) course of study, arrived at the unit. In his own words, he was not familiar with the Valentine tank (the 38th Training Tank Regiment was transferred to the training of tankers for the operation of foreign equipment only in March 1942). For a thorough study of such complex military equipment as a tank, three days is clearly not enough, especially for its commander. However, the company commander gave an objective and quite fair assessment of the battle. With such training, its result would be the same regardless of the military equipment involved in it: be it T-34 or Sherman, KB or Valentine. About the latter, by the way, in the above passage you can find some interesting information. It turns out that the armor is weak (this is 60 mm!), And the engine is low-power, and the speed “you can’t squeeze more than 25”, although “according to technical description should give all 40. Such "information" cannot cause anything but a smile. Behind it lies complete ignorance of the entrusted material part and the peculiarities of its use not only by the tank commander, but by the entire crew. Hence the lamentation at low speed, and references to the mythical technical description at a speed of 40 km / h! "Valentine" is an infantry escort tank, and it does not need high power density and movement speed. Moreover, the average speeds in an attack, as a rule, do not exceed 16-17 km / h (this is the endurance threshold of the crew members of any tank when moving across the terrain), and even less with infantry support - it is difficult to imagine an infantryman running into an attack from speed of 40 km/h! As for the maneuverability of the tank, they are provided not only and not so much by high specific power, but mainly by the L / B ratio. The smaller it is, the more maneuverable the car. At Valentine, it was 1.4, and in this indicator it surpassed the T-34 (1.5).

Forward to the west! Soviet tanks ("Valentine IX") entered the territory of Romania. 1944

Tanks "Valentine IX" pass through the streets of Botosani. Romania, April 1944.

The Valentine IX tanks of the 5th Guards Tank Army are moving into combat positions. 1st Belorussian Front, summer 1944.

A slightly different assessment of the "Valentine" is contained in the memoirs of N. Ya. Zheleznov, who was able to get acquainted with this car in the summer of 1942 at the 1st Saratov Tank School:

“For about a month, we trained in English Matildas and Canadian Valentines. I must say that Valentine is a very successful car. The gun is powerful, the engine is quiet, the tank itself is low, literally the height of a man.”

In fairness, it must be said that A.V. Kazaryan later quite successfully fought on the "Valentine" in the battles in the Rzhev direction, was awarded, became a platoon commander, and then a company. True, somewhere since July 1942, he calls his “Valentine” (by the way, models III or V) “thirty-four”, although, judging by the documents, until November 1942 in the 196th tank brigade of domestically produced tanks, except for T -60 was not. Yes, and the “thirty-four” is somehow strange - with a triple tower and anti-aircraft machine gun.

In a word, the given fragment of memoirs did not add clarity. Let's try to turn to a more impartial source: documents of the war years. In particular, to the "Brief Report on the actions of MK.III", dated January 15, 1942, which was compiled by the command of the 136th separate tank battalion, which participated from December 15, 1941 in the counteroffensive near Moscow. This report, apparently, can be considered one of the first documents containing an assessment of Lend-Lease equipment.

“The experience of using“ Valentines ”showed:

1. Tanks passability in winter conditions is good, movement on soft snow 50–60 cm thick is ensured. Grip with the ground is good, but spurs are needed when icy conditions.

2. The weapon operated flawlessly, but there were cases of undershot guns (the first five or six shots), apparently due to the thickening of the lubricant. The weapon is very demanding on lubrication and maintenance ...

3. Observation in devices and slots is good…

4. The motor group and transmission worked well up to 150-200 hours, then there is a decrease in engine power ...

5. Good quality armor…

The personnel of the crews underwent special training and owned tanks satisfactorily. The command and technical staff of the tanks knew little. A great inconvenience was created by the crews' ignorance of the elements of preparing tanks for winter. As a result of the lack of the necessary insulation, the cars hardly started in the cold and therefore kept hot all the time, which led to a large consumption of motor resources. In a battle with German tanks (12/20/1941), three Valentines received the following damage: one had a turret jammed by a 37-mm projectile, the other had a cannon, the third received five hits on the side from a distance of 200–250 m. In this battle "Valentines" knocked out two medium tanks T-3.

In general, the MK.III is a good combat vehicle with powerful armament, good cross-country ability, capable of operating against enemy manpower, fortifications and tanks.

Negative sides:

1. Poor grip of the tracks with the ground.

2. Great vulnerability of suspension bogies - if one roller fails, the tank cannot move.

3. There are no high-explosive fragmentation shells for the gun.”

There is no reason to doubt the objectivity of this report, compiled in hot pursuit. It is interesting to note that the Soviet tankers, like their British counterparts, noted the absence of high-explosive fragmentation shells in the cannon's ammunition as a drawback, but did not notice the tightness of the fighting compartment, apparently because the T-34, for example, still had it. closer. A number of design features the tank was criticized exclusively in parts of the Red Army. It goes without saying that in England or Western Europe, and even more so in North Africa or Burma, the water in the tank cooling system did not freeze due to the lack of frost. Most of the shortcomings of "Valentine" (and not only him), mentioned in our documents and memoirs, are associated with climatic factor making it difficult to operate. And here we come to another reason for the negative assessments of this combat vehicle by some of our tankers (as a rule, however, who fought on it for a short time).

Tank "Valentine IX" on the street of Iasi. Romania, August 1944.

Bridge layer Valentine-Bridgelayer at the NIIBT Polygon in Kubinka. 1945

There was a lot of trouble! Flush the cooling system and pour antifreeze into it - chores! At temperatures below -20 ° C, tractor kerosene must be added to domestic diesel fuel (we simply did not have diesel fuel of the required quality, and automobile diesel engines were on Valentines) - chores! To keep the engine warm, it is necessary to cover the radiators with plywood, tarpaulin or an old overcoat (on Valentine, by the way, for this purpose it was recommended to turn off one of the fans by removing the drive belt) - again chores! Of course, domestic equipment also required such measures, but, firstly, it was already created taking into account the quality of domestic fuels and lubricants and the level of maintenance, and therefore, for these reasons, it broke less often. In addition, for broken domestic equipment, they were punished less than for imported ones, for which it was “paid in gold”. This circumstance could not cause anything other than a steady hatred for foreign combat vehicles, including the Valentine, among the deputy technical officers and technicians. And what feelings could a driver experience, for example, reading the following provisions of the instruction manual:

“If, after 4–5 attempts, the engine of an English tank could not be started, it is necessary, if there is a device for starting with the help of ether, to load the pistol with an ampoule, press the primer puncture lever and start the engine with a starter. After starting the engine, do not allow it to run above 800 rpm until the oil temperature reaches 2TC (80°F) and the oil pressure rises to 60-80 psi.

Upon reaching these readings, the speed should be increased to 1000 per minute, and after 2-3 minutes, work can be done at a higher speed.

The movement of the tank can only be started after the engine is completely warmed up and always from the first gear in order to avoid damage (with frozen grease) of the gearbox, differential and final drives.

Like this! Not only do you need to monitor the temperature, but you need to get under way only from the first gear! (On the T-34, as you know, until the end of 1943, they generally used only one second gear, the rest simply did not turn on in motion.) Indeed, some kind of kerosene stove, not a tank! And in general - a phenomenon of a military-technical culture deeply alien to us!

True, by the end of the war, as our own military-technical culture grew and the use of many foreign technical solutions on domestic technology, claims against Valentine became less and less. In any case, about complex design and heavy use.

In 1945, in the article "Analysis of the development of foreign tank technology during the war years and the prospects for further improvement of tanks" by Major General of the Tank Engineering Service, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor N. I. Gruzdev, published in the collection of works of the Academy of Armored and Mechanized Forces, "Valentine" deserved the following rating:

“The MK-III, as an infantry (or, adhering to the weight classification, light) tank, certainly has the most dense overall layout and among this type of tanks is undoubtedly the most successful, although the removal of brake drums outside the hull is certainly wrong. Experience with the MK-III tank stops the discussion about the possibility of expedient use of automotive units for tank building.

The armored bulkhead between the engine and fighting compartments significantly reduces losses in the crew in case of fire and preserves the engine-transmission group during the explosion of shells. Surveillance devices are simple and effective. The presence of equalizers in the MK-III and servomechanisms, despite the low specific power, makes it possible to provide a satisfactory average speed tank of the order of 13-17 km / h.

Characteristic of the British tanks MK-III, MK-II and MK-IV is the preference given to armor; speed and armament are, as it were, secondary; there is no doubt that if this is tolerable in the MK-III, then in other tanks the disproportion is a clear and unacceptable minus.

It should be noted reliably working diesel GMC.

Of all the existing light tanks, the MK-III tank is the most successful. We can say that in the conditions of 1940-1943. it was the British who created the type of infantry tank.

Let's move on to allies. The USSR became the only country where Valentines were supplied under the Lend-Lease program. We were sent 3,782 tanks during the war, or 46% of all Valentines produced, including almost all vehicles made in Canada.

3332 of them reached their destination, 450 cars went to the bottom along with the transports carrying them. Tanks of seven modifications were supplied to us: 2-7, 9 and 10, and the Valentines of the Mk IX and Mk X modifications continued to be requested by the Soviet side for Lend-Lease deliveries almost until the very end of the war.

In the Red Army "Valentines" received different ratings. The command highly appreciated the tanks because of their tactical and technical characteristics, and in August 1942 even sent a request to increase their supplies to the USSR. Tankers had their own opinion. Vali-Tani, like the rest of the British equipment, were difficult to operate and often failed. Especially in hands that had no idea about the proper maintenance of British technology.

Expectedly and quite logically, "Valentines" turned out to be completely unsuited to climatic conditions our country. The 40-mm cannon was frankly weak, and there were no HE shells for it. This resulted in attempts to install a domestic 45-mm cannon on the Mk.III, but in the end it turned out to be easier to launch the production of high-explosive fragmentation shells in 1942.

"Valentines" fought on the entire Soviet-German front, starting from Murmansk and ending with the Caucasus, where they were driven through the Iranian lend-lease channel. Especially appreciated "Valentine" our cavalrymen. For maneuverability and good (when finalized with a hammer and file) patency.

The last use of "Valentines" in the Red Army took place already in the Far East during the offensive of Soviet troops in Manchuria.

This is the short one. What can be said, surveying the tank not in terms of numbers, but by touching it with your hands?

Reviews "they" are not enough, which is explained by the fact that half of the tanks out of 8 thousand produced fought with us. British historians noted the excellent reliability of the propulsion system and the tank as a whole, especially in comparison with other British vehicles of that period.

I will not comment at all, it is possible that compared to others, Valentine was just a handsome man.

What did the British scold?

Surprisingly, criticism was caused by ... the tightness of the fighting compartment, poor working conditions for the driver, a two-man turret and an insufficiently powerful 40-mm cannon, in addition to which there were no fragmentation shells.

I spoke about the cannon and shells above. Agree. As for the rest ... It was the British who were just mad with fat. They didn’t get into the T-34, so they criticize.

In fact, the tank is very comfortable and roomy. That is, a boar of non-tank dimensions (I) is placed there.

Probably, the 75-mm gun took its place with pleasure, but nevertheless, its appearance, albeit on a light (if classified by weight) tank after 1943, is quite justified. But there are also purely British things that can be applauded.

An armored partition (not very impressive, but again - there is!) Between the engine and fighting compartments significantly reduces losses in the crew in case of fire and saves the engine-transmission group during the explosion of shells.

Surveillance devices are simple and effective.

Hello everyone and welcome to the site! Friends, today our guest is perhaps one of the most unusual vehicles in World of Tanks, the Soviet light premium tank of the fourth level is Valentine II guide.

What is its uniqueness, you ask? Everything is very simple, this device has a very comfortable preferential level of battles - 4. This means that Valentine II WoT never fights against the fifth levels, throws us only to classmates and cars below the level.

TTX Valentine II

But despite its wonderful grace, you need to know the parameters of this baby and we will start with the fact that we have a very good margin of safety by the standards of the LT-4, as well as a good, but not best review at 350 meters.

At the same time, Valentine II characteristics bookings are among its advantages, although in reality, the armor here is not that very strong.

Let's start with the body and in the frontal projection, the yellow areas for the fourth level are very thick, the reduction here is 93 millimeters. However, the orange parts of the case, as can be seen on the collage model, are devoid of slopes, their thickness does not exceed 65 millimeters, and here Valentine II tank breaks through quite easily, only machine guns will not harm us.

With the tower, things are more interesting. Due to the fact that in the frontal projection there is a gun mask, various slopes, layers of armor plates and other things, the given armor values ​​here range from 41 to 137 millimeters, that is, to catch ricochets and non-penetration light tank Valentine II the forehead of the tower can often.

As for the onboard projection, it must be protected and not substituted sideways to the enemy. Basically, the reservation here has 60-65 millimeters of thickness, but the engine compartment, which Valentine II World of Tanks protrudes above the body, is protected very poorly (40 mm). However, when the tank is placed in a rhombus, the blow begins to hold both the forehead of the hull and the side, this can be used.

But if this kid is still not bad with armor, then in terms of mobility it’s definitely not a light tank, rather a heavy one. Valentine II WoT is the owner of a bad top speed, very dull dynamics (even 9 horses per ton of weight were not gained), and only with maneuverability everything is fine here, but you won’t feel it because of the general slowness.

gun

As it often happens, the armament of the tank deserves special attention, but don't flatter yourself, in our case it won't be good, because a second-level cannon is installed on board.

So, at Valentine II gun has a very small one-time damage and very high rate of fire. However, even with this, we can only give out about 1250 damage per minute, this is not enough. By the way, our ammunition load is also small, for such and such a rate of fire.

With penetration, everything is also bad with us, armor-piercing shells are only enough to cause damage to Tier 3 vehicles and soft fours, otherwise you will have to load sub-calibers. As an example, if light tank Valentine II will meet German tank destroyer Hetzer, in the forehead, he will not be able to pierce it even with gold.

The only tolerable moment in terms of weapons can be considered accuracy. Yes, we have a large field of view and poor stabilization, but thanks to a very fast convergence, you will hardly notice this, although it is effective to shoot at long distances Valentine II World of Tanks still can't.

The final note will be the elevation angles, the barrel bends down 6 degrees, this is not very bad, but far from perfection.

Advantages and disadvantages

It can be seen with the naked eye that in terms of general characteristics, and even more so in armament, this copy turned out to be rather weak. However, now we will try to highlight the main advantages and disadvantages Valentine II WoT, for clarity.
Pros:
Very comfortable level of fights;
Good margin of safety;
Decent review;
Good frontal armor;
High rate of fire.
Minuses:
Very weak mobility;
Small alpha strike;
Bad damage per minute;
Weak penetration;
Small ammunition.

Equipment for Valentine II

The equipment always gives the tanker a chance to “combine” his tank, make it more comfortable, smooth out the cons and improve the pros. In our case, this is also the case, but for Valentine II equipment presented in a very meager selection, so the picture will be something like this:
1. - will give a pleasant increase to the important characteristics of the machine, in particular, it will improve DPM, information, and visibility.
2. - The review we have is not bad, so why not make it even better?
3. - the only normal alternative, of all the rest, and even more to increase the speed of information is not such a bad option.

Crew training

Although we have only three people in the tank, you can’t really clear up, but you can’t leave the crew without proper training, because this is another good way improve the combat vehicle. In our case, on tank Valentine II perks it's better to upload it like this:
Commander (gunner) - , , , .
Driver mechanic - , , , .
Loader (radio operator) - , , , .

Equipment for Valentine II

Absolutely nothing new you will not see in terms of consumables. Despite the fact that we have a premium car, you won’t be able to farm much on it, and if you don’t have a lot of silver, take , , . For lovers of comfort and reliability, there is a more expensive set, with such preferences, take it to Valentine II Gear as , , . In this case, you can also replace the last element with.

Valentine II game tactics

Before us is a very slow car with frankly weak weapons, but capable of repulsing something with armor, so how will it dispose of such benefits?

The first thing I want to say about Valentine II tactics the battle implies the choice and pushing through one direction, we will not be able to change the flank due to poor mobility. At the same time, take into account the factor of allies, if the team is weak and starts to merge, it is better to start moving towards the base in advance in order to have time to protect it.

Regarding damage, Valentine II World of Tanks medium distances are best. In such cases, you can more effectively hit the enemy, and it will also be easier to use your not the strongest, but still available armor.

If we talk about tanking, put your light tank Valentine II rhombus, try to dance, but if possible, between shots it is better to drive off to cover.

Even better - show the enemy only the tower, it is armored better than the hull, and also has a compact size.

Otherwise, everything is typical, beware of artillery, keep an eye on the mini-map and try to maintain your safety margin. Thanks to the preferential level of fights Valentine II WoT is an interesting machine, but due to significant shortcomings, in order to play it well, you need to get used to it.