Colorful and detailed description of summer nature. Literary reading lesson: Description of nature (verbal landscape). Epithet. Description of summer - July, August

The main characters of the novel by I.A. Goncharov "Oblomov" are Oblomov and Stolz. The essay must begin with a description of the writer's intention. Goncharov shows a gradual death human soul. Of course, the author was not the first to bring such an image to the pages of the work, but he portrayed it in such a scale and versatility that literature did not know before him.

Barin Ilya Oblomov

From the beginning of the novel, the writer introduces the reader to an unremarkable gentleman. This is a typical image of the Russian nobility. Sedentary, imposing, loose, passive. The plot is devoid of action, intrigue. The apathy of Ilya Oblomov seems absolutely incomprehensible. All day Ilya lies on the sofa in a greasy dressing gown and thinks about everything. Many ideas hovers in his head, but none finds further continuation. Oblomov has no desire to start a conversation. He tries not to disturb the peaceful course of life in Oblomovka. His lazy daydreaming is interrupted only by petitioners who profit from him. But Oblomov doesn't care. He is so far from reality that he does not even notice the true intentions of his "guests". And here Goncharov introduces which takes us to the childhood of the hero. This is where the reason for this behavior lies. It was in childhood that a boy was raised to be a person unadapted to life. Indulging his desires, protecting him from any action, Ilyusha was inspired with the idea that nothing needs to be done, there will always be someone who will do it for him. A typical position of the nobles living at the expense of the peasants.

friend's arrival

The life of Ilya Oblomov changes with the arrival of Andrey Stolz, an old friend. Oblomov sincerely hopes that Stolz is able to change the current situation, is able to bring him out of his state of half-asleep. And indeed, a handsome young man arrives, who has gained both experience and money. No wonder Goncharov compares him with a blooded English horse. Unlike his friend, Stolz in Oblomov is alien to daydreaming and laziness. He is practical in everything.

It cannot be said that Oblomov has always been the same as he is now. In the days of their youth, Ilya and Andrey studied science together, enjoyed life, and strived for something. However, then the lively and active Andrei could not captivate Oblomov with his enthusiasm, and gradually this young gentleman revived in his estate the atmosphere to which he was accustomed from childhood. Stolz in the novel "Oblomov" is the exact opposite of the main character and at the same time the closest person. And it helps to reveal the features of Ilyusha, to identify and emphasize his strengths and weaknesses.

Friends since childhood

The characters are childhood friends. These are two completely different people who were brought together by fate. Ilya Oblomov with early age was a family favorite. He lived in harmony with himself and with the world around him. Ilyusha had everything he wanted. Relatives protected him from all troubles. He grew up as a kind of darling of fate, brought up on nanny's fairy tales, in an atmosphere of laziness and serenity, without much desire to learn, to learn something new. As a teenager, Oblomov met Stolz in the nearby village of Verkhlevo. The little gentleman, accustomed to bliss in his estate, - Ilya, enters a completely different world, energetic, new. Andrei Stolz's father taught his son to be independent early, instilling German pedantry in him. From his mother, Oblomov's friend Stolz inherited a love of poetry, from his father - a craving for science, for accuracy and accuracy. From childhood, he not only helps his father in business, but works and receives a salary. Hence Andrey's ability to make bold and independent decisions, to be responsible for his actions. Even outwardly friends are absolutely opposite. Ilya is a fat, loose, lethargic man who does not know what labor is. On the contrary, Andrei is a fit, cheerful, active person, accustomed to constant work. Lack of movement is like death for him.

The table "Oblomov and Stolz", located below, will allow you to more clearly present the difference in the images of the characters.

Love in the lives of heroes

Both experience love in different ways. And in love, Oblomov and Stolz are completely opposite. The essay, due to its volume, cannot cover the totality of the differences between the heroes of the novel. However, the theme of love should be considered.

When Olga brightens up Ilya's boring everyday life, he comes to life, from a flabby creature turns into interesting man. Energy in Oblomov is in full swing, he needs everything, everything is interesting. He forgets about his old habits and even wants to get married. But suddenly he begins to be tormented by doubts about the truth of Olga's love. The endless questions asked by Oblomov to himself, in the end, do not allow him to change his life. He returns to his former existence, and nothing touches him anymore. Andrei Stoltz loves selflessly, passionately, surrendering to the feeling without a trace.

Opposites converge

In other words, we see that Oblomov and Stolz (the essay reflects the generally accepted point of view) are completely different people who grew up in different environment. However, it was this difference that brought them together. Each of them finds in the other what he himself lacks. Oblomov attracts Stolz with a calm and kind disposition. And vice versa, in Andrey Ilya admires vital activity. Time tests both of them for strength, but their friendship only grows stronger.

Table "Oblomov and Stolz"

It is these that are presented to readers by Oblomov and Stolz. The essay can be completed with the words of the author himself: “It contained something that is more precious than any mind: an honest, faithful heart! This is his natural gold; he carried it unscathed through life."

Oblomov and Stolz are the main characters of the novel by I.A. Goncharova - people of the same class, society, time, they are friends. It would seem that formed in the same environment, their characters, worldview should be similar. In fact, these characters are antipodes. Who is he, Stolz, who is not satisfied with Oblomov's lifestyle and who is trying to change it?

Andrei's father, a German by birth, was a manager in a rich estate, and his mother, an impoverished Russian noblewoman, once served as a governess in rich houses. Therefore, Stolz, having received a German upbringing, had great practical ingenuity and diligence, and inherited from his mother a love for music, poetry, and literature. All days in the family were spent at work. When Andrei grew up, his father began to take him into the field, to the market. The boy studied well, his father taught him the sciences, German and made him a tutor in his small boarding school, even putting a salary. Quite early, the father began to send his son to the city with assignments, "and it never happened that he forgot something, changed it, overlooked it, made a mistake." His father taught him to rely primarily on himself, explained that the main thing in life is money, rigor and accuracy.

Work for Stolz became not just a part of life, but a pleasure. By the age of thirty, he, extremely purposeful and strong-willed person, retired, amassed a house and a fortune. Stolz is constantly busy with something: he works a lot, travels. “He is all made up of bones, muscles and nerves, like a blood English horse". Somewhat perfect hero. But "the dream, the mysterious, the mysterious had no place in his soul." Stolz "did not get sick in his soul, he never got lost in difficult, difficult or new circumstances, but approached them as if they were former acquaintances, as if he lived a second time, passed familiar places." And one more thing - Stolz is calm all the time, he is satisfied with his life.

Any person is usually brightly manifested in love. Stolz was hardly disturbed by love. Here, too, he acts rationally, "falling in love" with Olga. Family life Andrei and Olga, correct and boring, does not evoke any emotions when reading. The writer himself, as it were, got bored with the life of this exemplary bourgeois family. And although both heroes diligently occupy themselves with various practical activities, traveling, reading and discussing books, playing music, their life, it must be admitted, takes on colors only when it comes into contact with Oblomov's life.

Why did Stoltz fail to change the lifestyle of his friend and antipode Oblomov? And who is he who resisted the onslaught of Stolz? Russian gentleman, who at the time of our acquaintance with him was about thirty-two or three years old, "pleasing in appearance, with dark gray eyes, but with the absence of any definite idea, any concentration in facial features." Inertia, apathy, fear of any activity - this is the result of upbringing, when a boy is raised like an "exotic flower in a greenhouse", they do not allow him to take a step on his own, they pamper and pamper beyond measure. Learning makes him longing, and with the approval of his mother, classes are skipped at any opportunity.

The favorite pastime of the grown-up Oblomov is lying on the couch in empty dreams and a sweet dream. Life for the weak-willed Ilya Ilyich was divided into two halves: one consisted of work and boredom - these were synonyms for him; the other - from peace and peaceful fun. The service was unpleasant for him, and he retired very quickly. He can afford it: in addition to the servant Zakhar, he has at his disposal 350 souls of serfs who work for him. And if things go badly on the estate, it is only because of Oblomov's unwillingness and inability to manage the estate. He is tormented by the realization that he does not have strength and will, but he himself cannot, and does not really strive, to budge and asks his active childhood friend Stolz to help him: “Give me your will and mind and lead me wherever you want".

Having once pulled Oblomov out into the world, Stolz hears from a friend: “Boring, boredom, boredom! .. Where is the man here? Where is his integrity? Where did he hide, how did he exchange for every little thing? These words directly apply to Stolz. His ability to be everywhere is already almost inhuman ability. He "learned Europe as his estate", traveled Russia "up and down". The circle of his acquaintances is motley: there are some barons, princes, bankers, gold miners. All enterprising people who consider "business" the purpose of their lives.

What should Oblomov do in this company? What is he for Stolz: a tribute to childhood friendship, or some kind of outlet, or just an object for listening to his moralizing? And that, and another, and the third. A lazy man, but smart, Oblomov does not at all want to become like Stolz.

Stolz introduces Oblomov to Olga Ilyinskaya, and when he went abroad, "he bequeathed Oblomov to her, asked her to look after him, to prevent him from sitting at home." So Olga enters the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. Not a beauty, "but if she were turned into a statue, she would be a statue of grace and harmony." She has the intelligence and determination to defend the right to her life position. And Oblomov, seeing in her the absence of artificiality, beauty not frozen, but alive, perceived Olga as the embodiment of a dream.

What attracts Olga in Oblomov? She sees in him the absence of cynicism, the ability to doubt and sympathy. She appreciates his intelligence, simplicity, gullibility, the absence of those secular conventions that are alien to her. Olga wants to help this painfully incapable person. She dreams that "she will show him the goal, make him fall in love with everything that he stopped loving ...". She likes to recognize herself in the role of an “enlightener”: after all, she, a woman, leads a man! Love will become her duty. To fall in love in order to re-educate, "from ideological considerations" - this has never happened in Russian literature. Olga's falling in love is a kind of experiment.

Such is Olga Ilyinskaya in her love, but what about Oblomov? The further the relationship of young people develops, the more sincere he becomes. The very way of his life is changing: he visits the Ilyinskys with pleasure, listens to Olga's singing with fascination, walks a lot and for a long time, he does not have dinner and forgot about his afternoon nap. He is ashamed of himself for not reading - he takes up books. Oblomov suddenly realizes the uselessness, aimlessness of his existence.

As with any lover, the image of his beloved is always with him. “And Oblomov, as soon as he wakes up in the morning, the first image in the imagination is the image of Olga, in full growth, with a lilac branch in her hands. He fell asleep with the thought of her, went for a walk, read - she is here, here. He took care of his clothes now. Carelessness left him at the moment when she sang for him for the first time. “He was no longer living his former life ...” He concludes: “Love is a difficult school of life.”

But young people are not destined to be happy, because Olga loves Oblomov not for who he is, but for who she wants to make him. Painful parting of heroes. Why didn't their relationship work out? Because both expect the impossible from each other. So this approach of Stolz to Oblomov turned out to be ineffective.

It is known that Goncharov several times defined the genre of his novel as a fairy tale. If "Oblomov" is a big fairy tale, then "Oblomov's Dream" should be considered its core - a figurative and semantic key to understanding the character of the hero depicted by Goncharov, a story about the hero's childhood in the fabulously real Oblomovka.

In terms of its degree of closeness, Oblomovka can compete with any enchanted, bewitched kingdom. How many people come and come to it during long sleep Ilya Ilyich? We have almost no one to remember, except perhaps a funny episode with a sleeping man, whom children find in a ditch and take for a werewolf. The appearance of this stranger shocked even the adult Oblomovites so much that they do not dare to wake him up to find out where he wandered from and why.

But if it is difficult to come or come to Oblomovka, then to leave its limits is an action even more impossible for its inhabitants. Where? For what? As expected, the ideas of the Oblomovites about the earth are quite fabulous: “they heard that there is Moscow and St. Petersburg, that the French or Germans live beyond St. Petersburg, and then the dark world began for them, as for the ancients, unknown countries inhabited by monsters, people about two heads, giants; darkness followed there - and, finally, everything ended with that fish that holds the earth on itself.

But all this is somewhere far away. And Oblomovka, as she slept, will continue to sleep peacefully. Goncharov describes how sweetly the Oblomovites know how to sleep: they sleep, doze, dreaming in oblivion and unearthly bliss. Even the air sleeps because it "hangs without movement", even the sun is immersed in slumber because it "stands motionless". "It was some kind of all-consuming, invincible dream, a true likeness of death." The magical realm of sleep, of course, is contraindicated in any kind of movement, action. Therefore, Oblomovka is a world of fundamental idleness. The only type of labor consecrated by tradition here is the preparation and absorption of food. It is no coincidence that the writer reproduces the picture of eating a huge pie, which lasts five days.

Such is this “sleepy kingdom”, where almost no one works and dies, where there are no upheavals, where “thunderstorms are not terrible”, and “stars twinkle friendly from heaven”, where no one wants to be awakened to a different, even a wonderful life. .

To emphasize the impression of the fabulousness of the world he created, the writer introduces into Oblomov's Dream the image of a nanny who, on winter evenings, whispers tales to Ilyusha about "sleeping princesses", petrified cities and people, about Emel the Fool and hero Ilya Muromets. This Emelya is a kind of prototype of Oblomov in the novel. In the well-known folk tale a kind sorceress, appearing in the form of a pike, chooses a pet whom everyone offends, a quiet, harmless lazy person, and gives him gifts for no reason at all. And he eats, dresses up in a ready-made dress and marries some beauty.

In the life of Oblomov, a fairy tale and reality seem to be mixed up. He will be fooled and fooled by all and sundry, and in the end, fate will send him Agafya Matveevna as his wife - a new fabulous beauty, ready to do everything for him and for him.

The chapter "Oblomov's Dream" essentially convinces us that the hero's whole life was a dream, ending in an eternal dream. “One morning Lgafya Matveevna brought him, as usual, coffee and found him just as meekly resting on his deathbed as on his bed of sleep ...”

So, just as reality cannot defeat a fairy tale, so Stoltz was unable to change Oblomov's lifestyle. Especially what Stolz, how he came out with Goncharov. Nevertheless, it must be admitted that Stoltz turned out to be an unrealistic image of a noble friend and a successful businessman, whose character was not spelled out to the end, because to write it to the end would mean to expose what was not the intention of the writer. After all, the main theme of the novel is Oblomovism: a way of life characterized by apathy, passivity, isolation from reality, contemplation of life around oneself in the absence of labor and practical activity.

That is why Goncharov's work, contemporaries admitted, showing the typical character of Oblomovism for serfdom, was able to strike at "superfluous people" - people of words, not deeds. The re-education of Oblomov, changing his lifestyle were not included in the writer's plans.

Essay text:

In the novel Oblomov, I. A. Goncharov draws the traditional for Russian literature character of the hero of the Russian patriarchal gentleman Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, who by nature has an honest and faithful heart, but who was unable to resist life and became one of the superfluous people in it. Oblomov is opposed by his friend, Andrei Stolz, a very interesting and deeply conceived hero. If Oblomov is the embodiment of the patriarchal noble way of life in Russian life, then the image of Stolz combines features that are characteristic of both Russia and European bourgeois civilization. Here are expressed the views of I. A. Goncharov on the mutual differences between Russia and the West, and if Oblomov is Russian national character, who is characterized by kindness, honesty, naturalness and depth of feelings, as well as laziness and lack of initiative, then the European mentality embodies Stolz's father, Ivan Bogdanovich. It is characterized by industriousness, pedantry, punctuality, stinginess in the manifestation of emotions, rationalism. His son Andrei, a friend of Oblomov, received just such a rational upbringing from his father: everything was allowed to him, but he was strictly required to fulfill his duties. Oҭts was not alarmed that his son disappeared from home for a week, on the contrary, he himself kicked him out when he found out that when he returned, he did not make the assigned Latin translation. From childhood, the child was taught to work, to practical activities, and after giving him an education, his father sent him away and warned him not to count on his help anymore. The son justified his father's hopes, having achieved prosperity and a solid position in life, but the inferiority of such a German upbringing is shown in the scene of farewell between father and son, when feelings that did not get an outlet when parting with his father break out from the words old woman, maternally sorry for Andrei. His character came out not European due to the influence of the mother of a Russian noblewoman. She put her soul into her son, the ability to feel, love and understand music, art, poetry. She died early, but in memory of her son puts in his travel bags not only the work cloak she hates, a gift from his father, but also an elegant tailcoat and thin shirts. The mother dreamed of an outstanding role in society that her son would get, and it was the influence of two tendencies of different peoples that shaped the character of Andrei Stolz. Oblomovka, with its kind, fat caresses abundantly lavished on the German boy, and the princely estate in Verkhlev, where the father served as a manager, with a wide expanse of lordly life, played their role, and all this, in the author's words, turned the narrow German "track into such a wide way that Stolz's German ancestors never even dreamed of.Unlike Oblomov, Stolz leads an active lifestyle: he serves in some trading company, often travels abroad, different projects, sometimes in the world, reads a lot, is aware of all the events and succeeds in everything. He did not forget Oblomov: they are firmly connected by childhood and youth, and Stolz always played the role of a strong one. So now he patronizes a friend, trying to stir him up, to convince him to go abroad together, introducing Oblomov to Olga. There is complete trust between them, but in their attitude to life they are antipodes. If Oblomov is inactive and lazy, then, according to Stolz, labor is the image, content, element and purpose of life. And he last time trying to stir up Oblomov, make him change his life and change himself: Now or never. And indeed, having fallen in love with Olga, Oblomov changes internally, he leads an active lifestyle, gets up early, reads a lot. On the face of no sleep, no fatigue, no boredom. But Stolz left, and there is no one to support Oblomov when he gets tired mentally. He cannot but agree with Olga's point of view that life is a duty, but he himself is not capable of such intense constant dedication, his lyric impulse faded away, disbelief in his own strength was aggravated by financial problems. Having become a victim of the swindlers Tarantiev and Mukhoyarov, Ilya Ilyich refused to fight, from the word given to Andrei. And although Andrei is trying to help his friend and really helps him understand the financial situation, he also gave up the fight, the hope of awakening a living soul and a thirst for life and activity in Oblomov.
The image of Stolz is criticized, as a rule, negatively. Starting with N. A. Dobrolyubov, critics reproached him for selfishness, dryness, and rationality. But that's not the point, rather. Stolz is an atypical figure for Russian life. Although the author expresses his hope: How many Stoltsev should appear under Russian names!, but the image of the hero is more declarative than real. Stolz seeks in his life a balance of practical aspects with the subtle needs of the spirit. Oblomov once said to Stolz, criticizing Petersburg society: Either I did not understand this life, or it is worthless. Stolz just embodies the author's ideal, which understood this life, for which the main thing is work, movement and, finally, love, the last happiness of a person, which became possible for Andrey when he received Olga's consent to marry him. But it is precisely this declared happiness of the heroes that is unconvincing. They live in love and harmony, but for some reason Olga is sad, feels dissatisfied, some kind of strange blues. Their house is a full bowl, but life is closed, and it cannot be said that this is the happiness they dreamed of. Even the author himself admits that Stolz is not alive, but just an idea, and the artistic embodiment of this idea is far from perfect. Soft-hearted, inert Ilya Ilyich really did not understand this life, could not achieve meaning in it, which would have been impossible without the manifestation of energy and will. But the strong-willed, resolute Stolz failed to achieve the ideal of happiness for himself and for Olga. This philosophical task is too difficult for ordinary person. The author also understood the utopian idea of ​​creating an image harmonious person and the same love. In one of his letters, he comes to the following sad conclusion: Between reality and the ideal lies ... an abyss across which a bridge has not yet been found, and hardly ever will be built. For Goncharov's contemporary reality, the problem turned out to be insoluble.

The rights to the essay "Oblomov and Stolz (based on the novel by I. A. Goncharov Oblomov)" belong to its author. When citing material, it is necessary to indicate a hyperlink to

The heroes became friends in childhood, when Ilya's parents were forced to send their son to study at the boarding school of the German Stolz. The teacher's son, Andrey, always took care of his friend and tried to influence his beliefs, his way of life. He helped Oblomov in his studies both at the boarding school and at the university, but after their paths went separately, they rarely met.

Once Andrey came to a friend's apartment in St. Petersburg. They talked about life, about Oblomovka, and Andrei reproached his friend for inaction, told him about the need to change his life, to do business on the estate. Then Stolz suggested that Oblomov "finish the ideal of life ...". Ilya Ilyich dreams aloud, talking about a pleasant pastime, which is an idyll of idleness. He never once mentioned any activity, since labor was not part of his plans. Even a book should be read aloud by the wife when he is resting on the couch.

Lordly habits appear in his dreams in everything: all his desires are served by serfs, about whose work he has unrealistic ideas, drawing an idyll of their work. During the day, Oblomov's routine assigned a large place to eating, six times Ilya Ilyich had a meal: in the house, on the veranda, in the birch grove, in the meadow, and again in the house in the evening. There are no occupations, except for the contemplation of nature, talking on pleasant topics or relaxing with the sounds of music. And then Andrei began to convince Ilya to change the painted picture in order to return to an active life, not to fade away in his younger years.

Until the next meeting, two years later, there have been some changes. Stolz is still very active, he came to St. Petersburg "for two weeks on business, then went to the village, then to Kyiv ..." He stopped by a friend for a name day, on Ilyin's day. Ilya Ilyich at that time was already living in the apartment of the widow Agafya Pshenitsyna. He broke up with Olga, entrusted Zatertom (a friend of the mistress's brother) with the affairs of the estate, and now Tarantyev and a friend are robbing him of fraudulent methods.

Stolz is upset by the affairs of a friend, reminds Oblomov of his words uttered in their last conversation, “Now or never!”. Oblomov sadly admits that he did not succeed in reviving life, although there were attempts: "... I do not lie idle, ... I subscribe to two magazines, books ...". However, he broke up with the woman he loved, because his laziness and inaction did not disappear even at the best time of his life, during the period of love. Stolz summarizes: “You will notice that life and labor itself is the goal of life…”. He calls on Ilya Ilyich to act for his own sake, so as not to die completely: to go to the village, equip everything there, “mess with the peasants, enter into their affairs, build, plant ...”. Oblomov complains about his health, but Andrei tells him about the need to change his lifestyle, "so that he does not die at all, is not buried alive ...".

Stolz learns that Oblomov is being robbed by people who call themselves his friends. Andrey forced Oblomov to sign a power of attorney to manage the estate in his name and "announced to him that he was taking Oblomovka for rent" temporarily, and then Oblomov "he would come to the village and get used to the household."

Between friends again there is a conversation about attitude to life. Oblomov complains about life that “touches him, there is no peace!” And Stolz urges him not to extinguish this fire of life, so that it is "constant burning." Ilya Ilyich objects to these words, saying that he does not have such abilities and talents as Stolz, who is endowed with "wings". Andrei has to remind his friend that he “lost his skills as a child”: “It began with the inability to put on stockings and ended with the inability to live.”

If I were suddenly asked how to correctly describe nature in fics, and even in fantasy ones, I would shrug my shoulders in bewilderment. But to the question of how you describe her, mother, I would answer - like this, as I will write below. Therefore, I do not assume the importance of considering all options I will mention only those that I use. We must immediately take into account that there are few Prishvins and Paustovskys among us, not to mention the Turgenevs with their hunting notes, and yet nature has no bad weather, but without nature, the fic obviously loses something. Let's think about why: 1) Yes, because we are all children of nature and live in it, even if there is no tree visible outside the window. After all, nature is everything: the sky, the sun and water, and our heroes always come into contact with them, relatives. 2) Because the description of nature is beautiful if you choose the right epithets and generally be able to correctly look at the world around us. 3) Because with words we are trying to create a picture in the mind of the reader, and in this picture, as in a photograph, there is always a background - and in most cases - this is nature. 4) Because in fiction we are trying to reveal the feelings of the characters, and comparison with nature helps us to better convey experiences. Remember only from the literature lessons of poor Prince Bolkonsky with his oak tree! 5) And so on and so forth ... Each of us can write a certain number of points that are especially significant for him personally. And this is good. Means - the description of the nature is really necessary. I now turn to my understanding of the necessity of nature, namely where and when I include my descriptions. In order not to go far from the application, I will immediately describe the need for descriptions of nature in fantasy. In this genre, we introduce the reader to a fictional world and, like a child, explain our fantasy to him by means of comparison with the reality around us. Like, here we have a blue sky, and they have purple-pink, as if at sunset. The picture in the brain clicked - the passage was a success. Or we describe a world that is very similar to the one in which we live, then with descriptions of nature we confirm given fact. In general, nature in fantasy is necessary to immerse the reader in a new, unknown world. So, from here we immediately deduce a fad of a descriptive nature: 1) The description of nature creates a picture before our eyes, so it is important here not to spread our thoughts along the tree, but to immediately find the oak tree that is in the foreground in the picture. Here it is sometimes enough to describe the color of the sky, the number of trees in the background and the state of the grass on this moment. The non-Prishvinian reader gets tired of a more detailed description. But a sophisticated reader can be killed right here on the spot by the richness of the language that opens in the descriptive part of nature - the gossamer trembled like a thin shawl on the girl’s shoulders ... Or better, like Yesenin’s - as if I galloped on a pink horse in the spring, echoing early ... Where did it come from pink horse, you ask? Yes, many critics at first believed that it was just for rhythm and rhyme, that is, a beautiful word, but it turned out that White horse at dawn it is indeed pink, but only the observant eye of the poet caught it and put it into words. Therefore, for good descriptions you need not only a rich language, but also observation - you can wander the streets and take pictures, or you can simply save your favorite photos of nature found on the Internet to an album, and then, like at school, write an essay from the picture. So, it's time to put an end to it, because you can talk about pictures forever. 2) The second point is very close to me - I try to enhance the drama of the narration by nature, that is, two types of comparisons go into work: - nature suffers or rejoices along with the hero. Like, according to Rosenbaum, "nature was saddened by rains." Here we will describe a gloomy sky and a gloomy face, raindrops flowing down the cheeks mixed with tears, and now the reader is crying with the hero, because nature itself sympathizes with him. - nature does not care, that is, the hero is crying, and the sunbeams are laughing in the yard. This is very appropriate when the heroes are not understood by the world - neither people nor nature cares about them. Yet sometimes the contrast also reveals the depth of the experience. Like, he would now be jumping with sparrows through the spring puddles, but he doesn’t even have the strength to lift his leg to step over this very puddle. 3) Point - reflective. The hero sits and looks at nature, like the same Prince Andrei. So I, too, became covered with a crust and tired of life - beautiful on top and rotten inside. Excellent - that's the place of action and the state of the hero. Well, something like this. Perhaps not quite what the author wanted, but I tried to write a drabble. If someone likes it, I will gladly develop each point. While that's the case, brainstorming on the topic of the application. Thanks everyone for reading! And good weather in your fics!