Ancient rome army composition device equipment. Armament of the army of Ancient Rome (21 photos). Commanding staff of the Roman army

Regular army of ancient Rome

The ancient Roman army (Latin exercitus, formerly classis) is the regular army of Ancient Rome, one of the main elements of Roman society and the state, a decisive factor in the formation of the power of the ancient Roman state.

During the heyday of ancient Rome, the total number of the army was usually up to 100 thousand people, but could increase to 250-300 thousand people. and more. The Roman army had the best weapons for its time, experienced and well-trained command personnel, was distinguished by strict discipline and high military art of commanders who used the most advanced methods of warfare, achieving the complete defeat of the enemy.

Infantry - the main branch of the armies of Ancient Rome

The main arm of the army was the infantry. The fleet ensured the actions of the ground forces in coastal areas and the transfer of armies to enemy territory by sea. Military engineering, field camps, the ability to make quick transitions over long distances, the art of siege and defense of fortresses received significant development.

The main unit of the army of ancient Rome is the legion.

The main organizational and tactical unit of the army was the legion. From the second half of the 4th century BC. e. the legion consisted of 10 maniples (infantry) and 10 turmas (cavalry), from the first half of the 3rd century BC. e. - out of 30 maniples (each of which was divided into two centuries) and 10 turmes. All this time, its number remained unchanged - 4.5 thousand people, including 300 horsemen. The tactical dismemberment of the legion ensured high maneuverability of troops on the battlefield. From 107 B.C. e. in connection with the transition from a militia to a professional mercenary army, the legion began to be divided into 10 cohorts (each of which united three maniples). The legion also included wall and throwing vehicles and a convoy. In the 1st century A.D. e. the number of the legion reached approx. 7 thousand people (including approx. 800 horsemen).

Organizational structure of the army of ancient Rome

Almost in all periods existed simultaneously:
contubernia - 8-10 people;
centuria - 80-100 people;
maniple - 120-200 people;
cohort - ok. 960 people in the first and 480 in the rest.

Under the concept of signum, either maniples or centuries were understood.
Auxiliary troops were divided into cohorts and alas (in the Late Empire they are replaced by wedges - cunei). Irregular troops (numeri) did not have a clear numerical strength, as they corresponded with the traditional preferences of the peoples who made them up, for example mauri (Moors). Vexillations were called separate detachments that stood out from any unit, such as a legion. So vexillation could be sent to help another unit or to build a bridge.

Armament

Under Servius Tullia:
1st class: offensive - gladius, gasta and darts (tela), protective - helmet (galea), shell (lorica), bronze shield (clipeus) and leggings (ocrea);
2nd class - the same, without shell and scutum instead of clipeus;
3rd class - the same, without leggings;
4th class - gasta and peak (verutum).
After Scipio's reform:
offensive - spanish sword (gladius hispaniensis)
After the reform Mary:
offensive - pilum (special throwing spear);
protective - iron chain mail (lorica hamata).
Under Augustus:
offensive - dagger (pugio).
At the beginning of the Empire:
protective - Lorica Segmentata shell (Lorica Segmentata), segmented lorica late plate armor from individual steel segments. Comes into use from the 1st c. The origin of the plate cuirass is not entirely clear. Perhaps it was borrowed by the legionnaires from the armament of the gladiators-croupellari who participated in the rebellion of Flor Sacrovir in Germany (21). Chain mail (lorica hamata) also appears during this period—83.234.14.245 03:32, January 25, 2013 (UTC) with double mail coverage on the shoulders, especially popular with cavalrymen. Lightweight (up to 5-6 kg) and shorter chain mail are also used in auxiliary infantry units.

From the middle of the 1st century:
offensive - "Pompeian" sword, weighted pilums.
Starting from the North:
protective - scaly armor (lorica squamata)

A uniform

In I-II centuries:
paenula (a short woolen dark cloak with a hood).
From the 3rd century:
tunic with long sleeves, sagum (sagum) - a cloak without a hood, previously incorrectly considered a classic Roman military.

build

Manipulative tactics

It is practically generally accepted that during the period of their rule, the Etruscans introduced the phalanx among the Romans, and subsequently the Romans deliberately changed their weapons and formation. This opinion is based on reports that the Romans once used round shields and built a phalanx like the Macedonian, however, in the descriptions of the battles of the 6th-5th centuries. BC e. the dominant role of the cavalry and the auxiliary role of the infantry are clearly visible - the first was often even located and acted ahead of the infantry.
Roughly since the Latin War or earlier, the Romans began to adopt manipulative tactics. According to Livy and Polybius, it was carried out in a three-line formation at intervals (hastati, principes and triarii in the rear reserve), with the maniples of the principles standing against the intervals between the maniples of the hastati.

The legions were located next to each other, although in some battles of the Second Punic War they stood one behind the other.
To fill the too widened intervals when moving over rough terrain, a second line served, individual detachments of which could move into the first line, and if this was not enough, a third line was used. In a collision with the enemy, the small remaining intervals were filled by themselves, due to the freer location of the soldiers for the convenience of using weapons. The use of the second and third lines to bypass the enemy flanks, the Romans began to use at the end of the Second Punic War.

The opinion that the Romans threw pilums during the attack, after which they switched to swords and changed the lines of battle formation during the battle, was refuted by Delbrück, who showed that it was impossible to change lines during close combat with swords. This was explained by the fact that for a quick and organized retreat of the hastati behind the principles, the maniples should be placed at intervals equal to the width of the front of an individual maniple. At the same time, it would be extremely dangerous to engage in hand-to-hand combat with such intervals in the line, since this would allow the enemy to cover the maniples of the hastati from the flanks, which would lead to an early defeat of the first line. According to Delbrück, in reality, the line was not changed in battle - the intervals between the maniples were small and served only to facilitate maneuvering. However, at the same time, most of the infantry was intended only for plugging gaps in the first line. Later, relying in particular on Caesar's Notes on the Gallic War, the opposite was again proven, although it was recognized that it was not well-coordinated maneuvers of slender units.
On the other hand, even the hastati maniple covered from all sides could not be quickly destroyed, and kept the enemy in place, simply surrounding itself with shields from all sides (the huge shield of the legionnaires, absolutely unsuitable for individual combat, reliably protected it in the ranks and the legionnaire was vulnerable only for piercing blows from above, or for a retaliatory strike), and the enemy who penetrated through the gaps could simply be thrown with darts (tela) of the principles (which, apparently, were attached to inside shield in the amount of seven pieces), independently climbing into the fire bag and having no protection from flank fire. The change of lines could represent a retreat of the hastati during a throwing battle, or a simple advance of the principles forward, with the hastati remaining in place. But the breakthrough of a continuous front, followed by confusion and the massacre of defenseless heavy infantry (English) Russian, who had lost their formation, was much more dangerous and could lead to a general flight (the surrounded maniple simply had nowhere to run).

Cohort tactics

Since about the 80s. BC e. cohort tactics began to be used. The reason for the introduction of a new formation was the need to effectively resist the massive frontal onslaught, used by the union of the Celtic-Germanic tribes. The new tactic supposedly found its first application in the Allied War of 91? 88 BC e. By the time of Caesar, cohort tactics were commonplace.
The cohorts themselves were built in a checkerboard pattern (quincunx), on the battlefield they could be used in particular:
triplex acies - 3 lines of four cohorts in the 1st and three in the 2nd and 3rd at a distance of 150-200 feet (45-65 meters) from each other;
duplex acies - 2 lines, 5 cohorts each;
simplex acies - 1 line from 10 cohorts.

Quincunx

3 cohorts of 360 people. in non-deployed formation with gaps
On the march, usually on enemy territory, they were built in four parallel columns in order to make it easier to rebuild in triplex acies on an alarm signal, or they formed the so-called orbis ("circle"), which facilitated the retreat under intense fire.
Under Caesar, each legion posted 4 cohorts in the first line, and 3 in the second and third. When the cohorts stood in close formation, the distance separating one cohort from another was equal to the length of the cohort along the front. This gap was destroyed as soon as the ranks of the cohort were deployed for battle. Then the cohort stretched along the front almost twice as compared with the usual system.
The interaction of cohorts, due to the larger size of a separate detachment and the simplification of maneuvering, did not place such high demands on the individual training of each legionnaire.

Evocati

Soldiers who served their term and were demobilized, but re-enlisted in the military on a voluntary basis, in particular on the initiative of, for example, the consul, were called evocati - letters. “newly called” (under Domitian, this was the name given to the elite guards of the equestrian class guarding his sleeping quarters; presumably, such guards retained their name under some subsequent emperors, cf. Gigin’s evocati Augusti). Usually they were listed in almost every unit, and apparently, if the commander was popular enough among the soldiers, the number of veterans of this category in his army could increase. Along with vexillarii, evocati were exempted from a number of military duties - fortifying the camp, laying roads, etc., and were higher in rank than ordinary legionnaires, sometimes compared with horsemen, or even were candidates for centurions. For example, Gnaeus Pompey promised to promote his former evocati to centurions after completion civil war, however, in the aggregate, all evocati could not be promoted to this rank. The entire evocati contingent was usually commanded by a separate prefect (praefectus evocatorum).

The Roman soldiers of Septimius Severus outwardly differed little from the soldiers of Augustus, who lived two centuries earlier.
In the 3rd century, the Roman Empire experienced a period of political, military and financial turmoil. In the fifty years that have passed since the assassination of Alexander Severus in 235 and before Diocletian came to power in 284, almost thirty emperors have been replaced on the throne, of which only three died a natural death.

The straightforwardness of the "soldier emperors", many of whom came from the ranks, was reflected in the military uniform Roman army, which in this period for the first time achieved a noticeable uniformity.
In the 3rd century, a long-sleeve tunic became widespread. Such a tunic spread due to the influence of numerous German mercenaries who served in the Roman army.

On Roman icons of the 3rd century and later, Roman soldiers were depicted in a tunic with long narrow sleeves, a cloak and trousers.
It can be assumed that the wearing of northern European clothing in the Roman army first spread among the soldiers of the auxiliary units, then the imperial bodyguards began to dress like this, and, finally, all the legionnaires who served on the northern border of the empire began to wear barbarian clothes.

Emperor Caracalla (Marcus Aurelius Anonius Bassianus) reportedly continued to wear Germanic clothing even in Syria and Mesopotamia.
The Roman army had a large number of irregular units, whose soldiers were called numerii and cuneii.
The latter were federates (foederati) - German settlers who received land on the territory of the Empire in exchange for an obligation to perform military service.
All irregular units were led by national commanders, usually chiefs, and wore traditional clothing for their tribe. As a result, such detachments often became trendsetters and trendsetters in the imperial army.

When the Danubian army of Septimius Severus moved on Rome, the civilian population, who saw these legionnaires only on the column of Trajan and Marcus Aurelius, was horrified at what the soldiers looked like (Dion, LXXV.2.6).
Indeed, the soldiers looked like real barbarians: long-sleeved tunics and trousers (bgasae), which for centuries were considered completely unacceptable clothing for the Romans.
Among other complaints against unpopular emperors like Elagabalus or Commodus was their fondness for long-sleeved tunics.
Documents from Egypt written in Greek (the official language of the Eastern Empire) indicate the wearing of various tunics.
The military tunic, known as the sticharion, was decorated with colored stripes (clavi). In addition, the dalmatica tunic had long sleeves, although, judging by the documents, it was worn less often than the sticharion. The name Dalmatic leaves no doubt that this tunic comes from Dalmatia. The soldier emperors who ruled Rome in the 3rd century preferred to wear just such a tunic.
The vast majority of tunics in the illustrations of the manuscripts are red or white. Green and blue tunics are much less common. It is generally accepted that the tunics of ordinary legionnaires were white, and the centurions wore red tunics.

Mention should also be made of such a garment as camisia. Apparently, this was the name of a tight-fitting linen shirt. The name of this shirt came into Latin from the Germanic language through the Gallic language.
Later, kamisiya was often worn by priests, but before that it was very popular among soldiers.
On the eastern frontiers of the Roman Empire, clothing embellished with embroidery, often made with gold or silver thread, was popular. Initially, the Romans despised such fashion as barbaric, but gradually this style of clothing became common for emperors, their courts and bodyguards.
Some samples of military uniforms were very richly decorated. For example, Claudius Herculan, the imperial horse guard under Aurelian (270-275), is depicted on his tombstone dressed in a tunic or cloak, decorated with an image in the form of a sun with rays. Apparently, this decoration is somehow connected with the cult of the sun god implanted by Aurelian. The pattern was obviously embroidered with gold thread, which gave it an effect.

Such a pattern could be worn by all the guards of Aurelian. In general, the custom of that time was for the emperor to present expensive clothes to his supporters in order to emphasize his favor in particular and the greatness of the regime as a whole.
The rectangular cloak (sagum) was the most popular type of cloak among Roman legionaries for centuries. The image of this cloak is often found in fine arts that time.
But there were other variants of the cloak, some of which were used in the army. From alternative options mention should be made of the hooded cloak (paenula). This cloak was common in the early period, but by the end of the 2nd century, its image almost completely disappears on military tombstones, although it continues to be found on the tombstones of civilians.
In addition, soldiers in pencil cases are depicted on wooden door Cathedral of St. Sabina in Rome, dating back to the 5th century. It is possible that the penula was the cloak of the Praetorian Guard, since it is very often found on the monuments dedicated to the Guard. The temporary disappearance of these cloaks may be due to the disbanding of the Praetorian Guard by Septimius Severus, who replaced the guard with a detachment of bodyguards recruited from among the provincial soldiers.

Later authors mention another cloak with a hood, the so-called birrus or byrus. In Diocletian's price edict, this cloak appears as byrus Britannicus. Probably, the birrus also looked like a penula, but had an additional valve covering the neck, which compared favorably with the penula, which had to be worn with a scarf.

It is known that different raincoats were used on different occasions, and some of them were defined as only "military". For example, the soldiers of Saturninus wore heavy military cloaks in winter, but wore light cloaks in summer. Saturninus insisted that the soldiers not take off their cloaks even during dinner, so as not to put their legs out ...
Emperor Aurelian (270-275) opposed silk and gold-trimmed clothing, he owns an aphorism: "The gods forbid a fabric that costs as much as gold." But at the same time, Aurelian did not forbid his soldiers to wear beautiful clothes, and his guard wore especially beautiful golden armor and dress.
From the 3rd century onward, it is very difficult to determine whether a bare-footed person or a person in tight-fitting trousers is depicted. The paint on the sculptures has long faded and washed off, but the surviving frescoes and mosaics make it possible to determine that tight-fitting trousers were worn tucked into boots.
Pants were mostly dark in color: gray or chocolate brown. In the biographies of Augustov, it is said that Emperor Alexander Severus wore white trousers instead of the scarlet trousers common at that time.
In addition, the legs could be protected with different types of gaiters. On mosaics and frescoes, leggings are often worn by hunters and those who work outdoors.
Among the list of obligatory equipment and the usual rations for Gaius Messiah (probably an equestrian warrior) found at Masada, as well as a similar list for Quintus Julius Proclus, an equestrian warrior from Alexandria, mentions such a garment as a fascia, that is, a winding. In both cases, the windings are mentioned after the boots, which suggests that these are windings or footcloths.

Gaiters were rectangular in shape and made of cloth or felt. Most of the images show a fastening below the knee and at the ankle.
In the 2nd century, the wearing of boots spread. Socks came along with the boots. A 3rd-century tombstone from Apamea shows a soldier with socks rolled up over the tops of his boots.
There were some kind of tights in which the legs turned into socks.
Very popular shoes in the 3rd century were boots with lacing on the instep.
Until the end of the 3rd century, Roman soldiers were rarely depicted in headdresses. Therefore, the words of Vegetia, written at the end of the 4th century, that in former times they always wore headdresses, are surprising. This was done for training, so that the helmet worn on the head before the fight did not seem too heavy.

Such a headdress was called pillei and apparently it existed in two main versions.
Outwardly, the pill was a low, borderless cylinder with a smooth or rough texture. The smooth texture obviously corresponded to leather or felt pills, and the rough texture corresponded to sheepskin.
Diocletian's edict speaks of the pillae. made from sheepskin. Probably, the Roman pilli goes back to the Persian tiara.
Many warriors wore balaclavas that softened blows to the head.
The Romans also used armored clothing - thoracomachus, which was an analogue of the medieval aketon.
According to modern reenactors, thoracomakhs were made of linen stuffed with wool. If the thoracomach got wet, wearing it became unpleasant, and it took a long time to dry.

During their centuries-old history, the Romans created the most advanced weapons in antiquity, distinguished by durability, reliability and high combat qualities. The protective equipment of the legionnaire was quite simple to use, did not hamper the movements of the fighter on the battlefield, although they required a lot of physical effort.

In the field of offensive and defensive weapons, they adopted a lot, and then improved, from the neighboring Italics and, above all, the Etruscans, with whom their early history was associated, the Greeks, or rather the Macedonians, whose military organization during the Hellenistic period reached unprecedented heights, Spaniards, Gauls, Sarmatians. Since the time of the Republic, the standard protective kit has included a helmet - "galea" or "cassis", a shell - "lorica", a shield - "scutum". The term "lorica" ​​(lorica) is used to describe the armor that covers the chest, back, stomach and sides to the waist.
This armor had three main types:
1.Composite - all-leather or all-metal, or consisting of overlapping leather belts.
2. Their iron curved plates connected by buckles and hinges. The plates could be sewn to the skin. Flexible metal belts were attached to the plates, covering both shoulders and the middle part of the body. The width of the plates is 5-6 cm.
3. Chainmail.

Lorica lintea (Lorica lintea)

A type of soft armor used in the ancient Roman army. It was either a leather likeness of a cuirass protecting the torso, made of 2-3 layers of boiled leather; or a kind of tunic, also sewn from several layers of linen or wool, which was then boiled in salt and vinegar. Digestion added rigidity and strength to the skin or matter, but, all the same, the protective properties of lintea lorica were very small. Lorica lintea was used by lightly armed warriors, such as hastati or velites.

Lorica hamata (Lorica hamata)
This is one of the types of chain mail armor that was used in the ancient Roman Republic and Empire mainly by auxiliary troops: archers, cavalry, spearmen. Roman legionnaires also used the lorica hamata, and later the hamata began to be dressed by some legionnaires under the segmentata. The main theory says that the ancient Roman craftsmen learned to weave chain mail from the Celtic or Iberian tribes. For the most part, puck-shaped riveted rings for lorica hamata were made of bronze or iron, they had a diameter of about 5 - 7 mm, and strips of rings were located horizontally, which gave this armor flexibility, strength and reliability.

For each type of troops, there were their own variants of lorika hamata, specialized for one or another type of troops. Lorika hamata also had shoulder pads that protected the upper body, which in more resembled Greek linothoraxes (Linothorax). These chain mail pauldrons were connected on the chest with the chain mail cloth with bronze or iron hooks, went from the chest along the shoulders to the middle of the back, where they were also connected with hooks to the hamata. The number of rings in Roman chain mail could reach 40,000. . Hamata could weigh 9-15 kg (with shoulder pads - 16 kg). In its use, chain mail showed good results, and could last for decades, and all due to the fact that due to friction, when wearing lorik hamata, the rust itself was peeled off the rings, which accordingly increased its service life.

Despite the complexity of production, hamata lorica was cheaper than segmentata lorica, and ultimately in the 3rd - 4th centuries. AD, in the ancient Roman army, the legionnaires again completely switched to the use of chain mail, however, the new versions differed from the original ones, which were about hip-length and with a short, and sometimes completely absent sleeve, later types of Roman chain mail were about knee-length, with cuts down the front and back, and also had long sleeves.

Lorica segmentata (lorica segmentata).
Starting from the 1st c. a shell made of iron plates, fastened with copper fittings to the leather base of the lorica segmentata (lorica segmentata), comes into use. However, auxiliary troops (auxilia), as well as some legions in Asia and Africa, retained the hamata lorica as their main armor.

The origin of the lorica segmentata is not entirely clear. Perhaps it was borrowed by the legionnaires from the armament of the gladiators-croupellari, who participated in the rebellion of Flor Sacrovir in Germany (21). Thus, the popularity of protective equipment of this type in the Rhine legions could be explained. The lamellar shell was several kilograms lighter than chain mail. If the chain mail was pressed into the body upon impact, then the lamellar shell, due to its special elasticity, "absorbed" the force of the blow.

If the hamata lorica was used with might and main by the auxiliary units of the Roman army, then this type of armor was not available to them. Lorica segmentata was worn only by legionnaires and personal bodyguards of emperors - Praetorians.

The Latin name lorica segmentata appeared only in the 16th century (the ancient name of this armor is unknown). The Lorica Segmentata entered service at the beginning of the 1st century and immediately justified the hopes of the Roman generals. Lightweight, durable and much more resistant to chopping blows than the hamata lorica, segmentata lorica became a real symbol of the Roman army. The design of the lorica segmentata is quite interesting, it consisted of metal strips that were sewn onto leather straps. The stripes were more like halves of a hoop, which were fastened together on the back and chest, the upper part of the armor was strengthened with plates to cover the shoulders and upper body. It was convenient to store and transport Lorica segmentata, and as the parts (leather belts or metal plates) wore out, they could be easily and quickly replaced with new ones, which, of course, made it possible, instead of buying new armor, to simply repair the worn out one. The shell already connected at the back, with certain skills, could be relatively quickly thrown over oneself, like a shirt, and then tied and fastened in front.

This armor had a different weight, due to the fact that the thickness of the metal varied from 1 mm to 2.5-3 mm, thus the weight of the armor itself varied from 9 to 16 kg and more. During its existence, the segmentata has undergone various modifications more than once. Initially, the connecting parts of the armor were made of brass, for example: fasteners, loops were subsequently replaced with simpler bronze options - rivets, and the belts were changed to small hooks, two small ones at the bottom of the armor were replaced with one large strip.

Lorica plumata (Lorica plumata)
This is one of the most rare types of Roman scaly (lamellar) armor, which was used exclusively by officers of the Roman legion. Due to the low prevalence of this armor, information about it is extremely scarce, and they are collected bit by bit. Although the design of this armor is known, it is not known for certain whether the lorica plumata was used by anyone other than officers. This armor was not only a good means of protection, but also a distinctive feature. There is an assumption that ordinary soldiers were forbidden to use plumata lorica, if this was a hallmark of officers, then it is quite logical that the use of plumata by ordinary soldiers introduced some confusion in the ranks of their own troops.
Scale armor was one of the most practical and was in service in various countries Europe until the 14th century. It is not difficult to guess where this type of armor came from, our ancestors simply looked at the protection of animals, in some tribes in ancient times even armor was made from scaly animal skins. With proper processing, the skin did not lose scales, but only added in strength, and with the advent of metal weapons, lamellar armor became quite an interesting solution for protection. It was created on the principle of stitching together small metal plates-flakes. However, plumata lorica, in a sense, unique armor, because the scales in it looked more like bird feathers, and not fish scales or reptile scales.

The design of the plume lorica is quite complex, compared to the designs of most lamellar-type armor of that time, the scales in it were not stitched together and sewn onto chain mail rather than on a fabric or leather base, which gave strength and practicality. In addition to these fighting qualities, she had a spectacular appearance, which had a positive effect on fighting spirit soldier during battle. Although its protective properties were very high - almost three layers of metal, given the chain mail and plates overlapping each other, it is unlikely that generals or tribunes went on the attack in it. Most likely this strong and beautiful armor was a sign of rank, and not a real battle armor. Due to the complexity of manufacturing and the requirement for the master to have special skills for manufacturing, plumata was one of the most expensive armor in the Roman Empire. As in the case of other types of Roman armor, the original name was lost, and a new one was introduced by modern scientists due to the similarity of the armor to the plumage of a bird.

Lorica squamata (Lorica squamata)
This is another type of ancient Roman lamellar armor, but, unlike plumata lorica, it was used not so much by officers as by mounted warriors, although many centurions wore squamata. There is an assumption that the lorica squamata appeared in the Roman army under the influence of Parthian weapons, which at that time was dominated by a scaly type of armor.

Lorica squamata was made according to the same principle as plumata. Metal plates in the form of fish scales were fastened to the chain mail, often the scales were additionally fastened together with a wire or a strong cord, so there could be from 4 to 12 holes in the scale, and sometimes more. The plates were fastened in horizontal rows and had a rounded shape, so the lorica squamata looked more like fish scales. Remarkably, scales on one armor could be made of different types of metal, most likely this was used simply as a decorative component, without affecting the degree of protection.

The thickness of the plates varied from 0.5 mm to 0.8 mm, while the size of the plate could vary from 6.5x9.5 mm to 5x8 cm, however, on average, the size of the plate was approximately 1.3x2.5 cm. But despite this difference , any lorica squamat gave excellent protection for the torso, since the plates perfectly overlapped each other in a checkerboard pattern, so the impact force was evenly distributed over almost the entire armor, while the armor almost did not restrict movement. The length of the squamata was the same as the hamata, because it was the hamata that was often taken as the basis. The weight of this scaly armor depended on the number of rings in the chain mail base and on the number of scales.

The only weak side of the armor is a piercing blow from the bottom up, the point fell between the plates and tore the chain mail, with such blows (albeit rare, but still taking place), the lorica squamata protected no better than the hamata lorica. Despite the cost, this type of armor becomes more common around the 3rd century BC. AD

Lorica musculata (Lorica musculata)
This is an anatomically shaped ancient Roman shell, which originated from the ancient Greek thorax. The very first Roman armor looked like two plates (chest and dorsal) held on shoulder straps, a kind of harness.
And only with time, after several contacts of the Roman and Greek civilization, did the lorica of the musculata appear. This armor completely replaced the first armor of the Roman legionnaires of the early Republic, and was used as standard armor until the end of the 2nd beginning of the 1st centuries. BC. Muscular Lorica showed itself all this time as a reliable and practical armor that did not greatly hinder movement, but appeared more interesting option, which gave greater freedom in movements, while not inferior in protective qualities.

Lorica hamata was more expensive to manufacture than muscle carapace, but lasted longer and was cheaper to repair, which is why lorica hamata became standard protection. Muscular lorica remained the same as the armor of the highest officers, in contrast to plumata lorica, which was used by middle-ranking officers. During the Roman Empire, only generals, legates and the emperor himself could wear armor.

The first types of Roman thorax for the soldiers of the republic were made of bronze and consisted of two parts (chest and dorsal), which were fastened together with belts. In length, they differed from the imperial versions only in that they covered the torso of the warriors only to the hips. Imperial officer armor was very different, because it was made not only from bronze (at that time it became one of the rarest options), but also from leather and iron (later versions began to be created from steel).

Also, leather strips began to be fixed to the lower part of the armor in a vertical position, often with sewn metal plates, which made the armor approximately knee-length, and in this case, the protection extended not only to the torso, but also to the upper legs.

Among other things, some armor of the Muscular Loric was made not only consisting of 2 parts, but also monolithic (of course, with the exception of leather strips). In any case, after being withdrawn from service, the muscle lorica became more of a parade armor than a combat one.

Lorica hamis serta (Lorica hamis serta)
A shell made of bone (or metal) plates, not sewn onto a leather or fabric base, but interconnected by metal hooks and rings.

Each plate (at its upper edge) has two holes through which the fastener passes. When the plates are aligned, each fastener strip is covered and protected by the circular ends of the top layer plates.
Information about this armor is very limited.

An essential element of the protective armament of a legionnaire was a helmet.

Apulo-corinthian
A type of helmet that came into the Roman army from the South Italian Greeks and Etruscans, who in turn had it in the 6th-4th centuries. BC e - Apulo-Corinthian (apulo-corinthian) - indicates that this type was originally produced mainly in Apulia. The standard Corinthian helmet was taken as a model and structurally it was turned into a helmet worn exclusively on the head, not allowing the face to be covered. At the same time, the nose cutout and eyes began to carry a purely decorative function, and on at least one sample they were simply scratched on the helmet metal itself.

Structurally, this helmet is a high bronze helmet, beveled to the front, with a straight cut along the lower edge and a slight neck shield. Despite numerous painted reconstructions, this helmet apparently did not have metal cheek pads and was fastened by means of a chin strap and a neck shield strap. The height of such helmets usually varies between 165-250 mm., Its weight ranges from 670 to 1084 grams. , although there are options up to 1535 gr. To his characteristic features also include strongly protruding eyebrows knocked out on the front side above the eye sockets, as well as an expanding occipital part. The helmet was often decorated with notches and engravings on both sides, usually depicting boars, bulls or horses, and (less often) lions, sphinxes and dogs. The thickness of these helmets varied from 0.5 to 2.0 mm.

As an additional decoration, this type of helmet usually carried a vertical detachable (or stationary) rack for attaching a horsehair crest and two stationary side tubes for feathers.

Chalcidian
A helmet of Greek origin, also borrowed from the Italic Greeks, examples of which for Italy are usually dated to the 6th-3rd centuries. BC e. Structurally, it was much more advanced compared to the Apulo-Corinthian type, having a fairly deep conical helmet, which initially had a high longitudinal rib, later (when the helmet became more rounded) replaced by an embossed chased rib, ear cutouts with a slight metal bend and pretty good protection of the cervical region , which fell significantly below the front edge. The helmet, the material for which was also bronze, had an insignificant rudimentary nosepiece on the front edge, and the helmet itself carried numerous embossed ribs that imitated the superciliary part (usually depicted on reliefs), forming curls on the temporal parts of the helmet, and also carried a rib separating the cervical region from the helmet itself.

The helmet had developed cheek pads attached to the helmet on hinges, the shape of which became a model for late Roman helmet variations. The cheek pads had eye and mouth cutouts and created a satisfactory lateral view.

The helmet also carried a detachable center post for a hair comb and side tubes (or coils) for feathers. The height of such a helmet was usually 190-220 mm., And the weight was 700-1200 grams.

Montefortino
One of the most massive helmets, the history of which covers not only the entire period of the Roman Republic, but almost the entire I century of the empire. Usually considered to be borrowed from the Gauls, although there are examples of such helmets from Apulia and even Sicily, dating from the 5th century. BC e. Being the most numerous Roman helmet.

Structurally, it was a bronze (rarely iron) domed or hemispherical (later) helmet, which had a massive pommel - both monolithic and drilled for attaching a comb of feathers or horsehair. Some samples had additionally installed iron tubular mounts (up to 5 pieces) for feathers. One sample from a Gallic burial near Parma has side fasteners for fixing high and flat horns on a helmet.

The helmet itself of this type of helmet was made by casting (with subsequent forging) or forging. The helmet had a straight cut along the lower edge and, initially, a completely insignificant neck shield, bent from the helmet itself, which had a hole in the center for fixing the hanging ring of the strap, through which the helmet was fixed on the wearer's head. Accordingly, the thickness of such helmets was 2-3.5 mm for cast helmets and 0.7-1.5 mm for forged ones. The weight of such helmets varied between 0.7 - 2.2 kg. Decorations on most of these helmets consisted of 5-6 sawn horizontal lines, repeating the lower edge, a twisted rim and a leaf-shaped ornament of a comb knob on the top of the helmet. Sometimes there were additional decorations in the form of various figures.

The cheek pads, which were hinged to the helmet, were practically flat with a slight curve and wide enough to partially cover the wearer's ears. They had eye and mouth cutouts, which are on early models had strongly protruding parts. The helmet itself had excellent visibility, but completely insufficient protection of the cervical region, which had to be compensated for by the use of a long horsehair crest falling on the back.

In the process of becoming mass-produced of this type of helmet, it underwent changes towards simplification, having lost almost all of its decoration and, moreover, became lower - almost hemispherical, and the neck shield increased significantly. Some of the latest models, dating back to the 1st half of the 1st century, are already almost indistinguishable from the Coolus helmet, as they have a pointed pommel and brow reinforcement, while the latest (discovered near Cremona and dated to 69) already has a giant neck shield and simplified flat cheek pads.

Coolus
A helmet originating from Gallic models, commonly called Mannheim, and which appeared in the Roman army from the con. 1st century BC e. It was in service with the Roman troops until the 3rd quarter of the 1st century.

The helmet had a hemispherical helmet, almost always made of bronze - there was only one iron version, but while in the Dortmundt Museum, it was destroyed during the Second World War.

Helmets of the coolus type had a straight cut along the lower edge (as in the case of the montefortino), and also did not have ear cutouts and, accordingly, coatings for them. Initially, the helmet was devoid of a crest holder, but later they appeared - as well as side tubes for feathers. Early models also had a minor neck guard, which later developed into a rather large and flat one. The cheek plates had complex embossed ribs, and also differed in large size and significant cutouts for places near the eyes and mouth. A significant difference between this type of helmet was the invariable reinforcing visor in front of the front of the helmet, designed to protect against a chopping blow to the front of the head. On the first models, it had a complex profile, later it became lightweight and had an L-shaped profile. The thickness of the helmet varied from 0.9 to 1.5 mm (sometimes up to 2 mm), the approximate weight was up to 1.5 kg.

Imperial-Italic
One of the large groups of helmets, along with the Imperial-Gallic, formed the basis for completing the helmets of the imperial army of the 1st-3rd centuries. It is considered to be based on the previous models of Italian gunsmiths, and at first, on this basis, it was claimed that bronze models predominated in this group, although in fact their ratio is about half.

The helmet helmet is mostly shallow, for the first time its occipital part began to fall below the front lower edge and there it began to be reinforced with broken ribs - usually in an amount of 3 to 5. The helmet itself had a good hemispherical shape, which subsequently began to better fit the shape of the head, ear cutouts appeared on it - the covers of which on the first samples were bent from the metal of the helmet itself, later became overhead. The neck shield was well developed almost from the very beginning and, as it became natural, in later models it reached a significant size. The shield itself also had knocked-out ribs and had a slight downward bend, remaining almost flat. The reinforcing frontal visor at first looked like a solid bar, later it became profiled in the form of the letter G. The cheek pads were usually quite narrow, with ribs and crescents embossed on them as standard, as well as folds from the side of the neck and throat. There were cheek plates and they were completely smooth.

In the next models of this type of helmets, they begin to use reinforcing crossed overhead rims that cross at the top and protect the helmet from chopping blows; the helmets themselves are sometimes equipped with a fairly large number of applied bronze ornaments, and a small hilt appears on the neck shield for wearing it. As a rack for the crest, both a holder identical to the Coolus type and a new sample were used - a rotary type, where the crest fork itself was inserted into the slot of the patch plate on the top of the helmet and fixed by turning. Small hooks riveted on the front and back of the helmet served as an additional means of fixing the crest box. Later models of the helmet had a corrugated bronze strip on the brow as a decoration, and the edges of the neckguard and cheek guards themselves often had a bronze edging to hide the poorly finished edges of the metal.

The thickness of this type of helmet varied from 0.8 to 1.5 mm, weight - up to 1.5 kg.

In general, this is a fairly high-quality helmet, which provided excellent protection for the wearer's head, on which all design features were tested and implemented, to which there was practically nothing to add later.

Scutum
The shield of the Roman legionnaire was the foundation of all the military art of Rome. This is a convex growth shield, about 120 cm high and up to 75 cm wide. We are most familiar with rectangular scutums, common during the Empire, but the armies of Republican Rome were more often armed with oval ones.

The shield was made of glued wooden planks (practically plywood) and sheathed with leather on the outside. The edges of the shield were edged with bronze or iron; in the center there was a rounded bronze umbon. The Roman shield had only one horizontal handle in the center. Like the Argive shields, the scutums were very heavy - rectangular ones weighed about six kilograms, and oval ones were even heavier ...

In battle, the legionnaire held a shield in front of his chest, practically pressed to the body, while the chest, stomach and hips of the warrior were completely covered. Because of this, the Romans wore a gladius not on their left, but on their right side - it would be very difficult to take out a sword, even a short one, from under such a shield. Attacking, the legionnaire pushed the enemy - and this was not a blow with his hand, but with his whole body, primarily with his shoulder pressed against the shield (this is how doors are planted) - and it was not easy to stand on his feet. In hand-to-hand combat, the legionnaires often crouched, putting the shield on the ground - with a short sword in their hands, the fighter, covered from the sides by his comrades, turned out to be well protected, and it was very difficult to get him. At the same time, the static nature of the battle line was more than compensated for by the maneuvers of individual formations.

Trajan, who ruled in Rome from 98 to 117 AD, went down in history as a warrior emperor. Under his leadership, the Roman Empire reached its maximum power, and the stability of the state and the absence of repression during his reign allowed historians to deservedly consider Trajan the second of the so-called "five good emperors." The contemporaries of the emperor would probably agree with this assessment. The Roman Senate officially proclaimed Trajan "the best ruler" (optimus princeps), and subsequent emperors were guided by him, receiving parting words during the accession "to be more successful than Augustus, and better than Trajan" (Felicior Augusto, melior Traiano). During the reign of Trajan, the Roman Empire conducted several successful military campaigns and reached the largest size in its history.

The equipment of the Roman legionnaires during the reign of Trajan was distinguished by functionality. The centuries-old military experience accumulated by the Roman army was harmoniously combined in it with the military traditions of the peoples conquered by the Romans. We invite you to take a closer look at the weapons and equipment of a Roman legionary infantryman of the early 2nd century AD in the Warspot interactive special project.

Helmet

As early as the beginning of the 1st century AD, Roman gunsmiths on the Upper Rhine, taking as a basis the Celtic helmet model that had previously existed in Gaul, began to make combat headpieces with a deep solid forged iron dome, a wide backplate to protect the neck, and an iron visor in front, additionally covering the face from those applied from above chopping blows, and large cheek-pieces, equipped with chased ornaments. On the front, the dome of the helmet was decorated with chased ornaments in the form of eyebrows or wings, which allowed some researchers to attribute the first such helmets to the warriors of the Lark Legion (V Alaudae), recruited by Julius Caesar among the Romanized Gauls.

Another characteristic feature of this type of helmet was cutouts for the ears, which were closed on top with bronze lining. Bronze decorations and onlays are also characteristic, which look very effective against the background of the light surface of the helmet's polished iron. Elegant and extremely functional, this type of helmet of the Gallic series by the end of the 1st century became the predominant model of the battle headgear in the Roman army. According to his model, weapons workshops located in Italy, as well as in other provinces of the Roman Empire, began to forge their products. An additional feature that appeared, apparently, during the Dacian wars of Trajan, was an iron cross, which began to reinforce the dome of the helmet from above. This detail was supposed to give even greater strength to the helmet and protect it from the blows of the terrible dac scythes.

Plate armor

The reliefs of Trajan's Column, erected in Rome in 113 to commemorate the conquest of Dacia, depict legionnaires dressed in plate armor, the so-called. lorica segmentata, while auxiliaries infantry and cavalry wear mail or scale armor. But such a division is certainly not true. Contemporary reliefs of the Trajan's Trophy Columns at Adamiklissia depict legionnaires dressed in chain mail, and archaeological finds of pieces of plate armor in the frontier forts occupied by auxiliary units indicate that the soldiers in these units wore lorica.

The name lorica segmentata is a modern term for the name of the plate armor, known from numerous images of the 1st-3rd centuries. Its Roman name, if any, remains unknown. The oldest finds of plates of this armor come from excavations near Mount Kalkriese in Germany, identified as the site of a battle in the Teutoburg Forest. Thus its appearance and distribution date back to the final stage of the reign of Augustus, if not earlier. Concerning the origin of this type of armor, various points vision. Some derive it from the solid armor worn by the Gallic gladiators croupellari, others see it as an oriental development, better adapted to hold the arrows of the Parthian archers in comparison with traditional chain mail. It is also unclear the extent to which plate armor was distributed in the ranks of the Roman army: whether soldiers wore it everywhere or only in some separate special units. The degree of distribution of finds of individual parts of the armor rather testifies in favor of the first hypothesis, however, there can be no question of the uniformity of protective weapons in the style of images of the reliefs of Trajan's Column.

In the absence of real finds, many different hypotheses were put forward about the structure of plate armor. Finally, in 1964, during excavations of the border fort in Corbridge (Britain), two well-preserved pieces of armor were found. This allowed the British archaeologist H. Russell Robinson to reconstruct the lorica segmentata of the late 1st century, as well as to draw certain conclusions about the structure of the armor of a later period, previously found during excavations at Newstead. Both armor belonged to the so-called laminar type of armor. Horizontal stripes, slightly funnel-shaped, were riveted on the inside of a leather belt. The plates overlapped slightly on top of each other and formed an extremely flexible metal coating for the hull. Two semicircular sections made up the right and left parts of the armor. With the help of straps, they were fastened on the back and chest. A separate composite section was used to cover the upper chest. With the help of straps or hooks, the bib was connected to the corresponding side half. From above, flexible shoulder pads were attached to the breastplate. To put on the armor, it was necessary to put your hands into the side cutouts and fasten it on your chest, as you fasten a vest.

Plate armor was strong, flexible, light and at the same time very reliable means of protection. In this capacity, he existed in the Roman army from the beginning of the 1st to the middle of the 3rd century AD.

Bracers

On the reliefs of Trajan's Trophy at Adamiklissi, some Roman soldiers wear bracers to protect their forearms and hands. This piece of equipment is of oriental origin and is a vertical row of plates riveted on the inside to a belt in the full length of the arm. In the Roman army, this type of protective equipment was used quite rarely, however, judging by the images, it was worn by gladiators. When Trajan's troops began to suffer heavy losses from the blows of the Dacian braids, he ordered to protect the hands of his soldiers with the same armor. Most likely, this was a short-term measure, and in the future this piece of equipment did not take root in the army.

Sword

In the middle - second half of the 1st century, a sword with a blade 40–55 cm long, 4.8 to 6 cm wide and with a rather short edge became widespread in the Roman army. Judging by the proportion of the blade, it was mainly intended for cutting the enemy, who did not wear protective armor. Its shape already very vaguely resembled the original gladius, the characteristic feature of which was a long and thin tip. These modifications of weapons corresponded to the new political situation on the borders of the empire, whose enemies from now on were the barbarians - Germans and Dacians.

Legionnaires carried a sword in a frame scabbard. On the front side, they were decorated with bronze cut-out plates with geometric patterns and figured images. The scabbard had two pairs of clips, on the sides of which side rings were attached. Through them passed the end of the belt, split in two, on which the scabbard with the sword was hung. The lower end of the belt was passed under the belt and connected to the lower ring, the upper end passed over the belt to the upper ring. Such a mount provided a secure fixation of the scabbard in a vertical position and made it possible to quickly draw the sword without holding the scabbard with your hand.

Dagger

On the left side on the waist belt, the Roman legionnaires continued to wear a dagger (not visible in the illustration). Its wide blade was forged from iron, had a stiffening rib, symmetrical blades and an elongated point. The length of the blade could reach 30-35 cm, width - 5 cm. The dagger was worn in a frame sheath. The front side of the scabbard was usually richly inlaid with silver, brass or decorated with black, red, yellow or green enamel. The scabbard was hung from the belt with a pair of belts passed through two pairs of side rings. With such a suspension, the handle was always directed upwards, and the weapon was constantly ready for combat use.

Pilum

On the reliefs of Trajan's Column, Roman legionaries carry a pilum, which at this time retains its significance as a first-strike weapon. Judging by the archaeological finds, its design has not changed since earlier times.

Some soldiers, who were distinguished by great physical strength, supplied the shaft of the pilum with spherical lead nozzles, which increased the weight of the weapon and, accordingly, increased the severity of the blow inflicted by it. These attachments are known from pictorial monuments II – III centuries, but among the real archaeological finds have not yet been found.

kultofathena.com

Shield

At the end of the 1st century BC, the oval shield, known from the images of the era of the Republic, straightened the upper and lower faces, and by the middle of the century, the side faces also became straight. The shield thus acquired a quadrangular shape, known from the reliefs on Trajan's Column. At the same time, oval-shaped shields, known from images of an earlier time, continued to be in use.

The design of the shield remained the same as before. Its dimensions, judging by the proportions of the figures of warriors, were 1 × 0.5 m. These figures are in good agreement with archaeological finds of a later time. The base of the shield was made of three layers of thin wooden planks glued at right angles to each other. The thickness of the wood, judging by the surviving rivets of the umbons, was about 6 mm.

From the outside, the shield was covered with leather and richly painted. The depicted scenes included laurel wreaths, lightning bolts of Jupiter, as well as emblems of individual legions. Along the perimeter, the edges of the shield were upholstered with bronze clips so that the tree would not chip from the blows of enemy swords. In the hand, the shield was held by the handle formed by a transverse wooden plank. In the center of the field of the shield, a semicircular cut was made, into which the brush holding the handle was inserted. Outside, the cutout was closed with a bronze or iron umbon, which, as a rule, was richly decorated with engraved images. The weight of a modern reconstruction of such a shield was approximately 7.5 kg.

Tunic

The soldier's tunic has not changed much since previous times. As before, it was cut from two rectangular pieces of woolen fabric about 1.5 × 1.3 m, sewn on the sides and at the neck. The cutout for the head and neck remained wide enough so that during field work, for greater freedom of movement, soldiers could lower one of her sleeves, completely exposing the right shoulder and arm. At the waist, the tunic was gathered in folds and girded with a belt. A high-belted tunic that opened the knees was considered a sign of the military.

In the cold season, some soldiers wore two tunics, while the lower one was made of linen or fine wool. The Romans did not know any specific statutory color of clothing. Most of the soldiers wore tunics made of undyed wool. Those who were richer could wear tunics of red, green or blue. In ceremonial conditions, officers and centurions dressed in bright white tunics. To decorate tunics, two strips of bright color were sewn on their sides - the so-called claves. The usual cost of tunics was 25 drachmas, and this amount was deducted from the soldier's salary.

Trousers

The Romans, like the Greeks, considered trousers an attribute of barbarism. In the cold season, they wore woolen windings on their legs. Short pants to protect the skin of the thighs from horse sweat were worn by Gallic and German horsemen, who had served in the Roman army en masse since the time of Caesar and Augustus. In the cold season, they were also worn by the foot soldiers of the auxiliary troops, also recruited from among the non-Romanized subjects of the empire.

The legionnaires depicted on Trajan's Column still do not wear trousers, but Emperor Trajan himself and senior officers who rode for a long time are depicted wearing narrow and short breeches. During the first half of the 2nd century, the fashion for these clothes spread among all categories of troops, and on the reliefs of the Column of Marcus Aurelius, short trousers are already worn by all categories of troops.

Tie

On the reliefs of Trajan's Column, soldiers are depicted with ties. Their function is to protect the upper part of the tunic from friction and damage caused by armor. Another purpose of the tie is clarified by its late name "sudarion", which comes from the Latin sudor - "sweat".

Penula

In inclement weather or in the cold season, soldiers wore raincoats over their clothes and armor. Penula was one of the most common raincoat models. It was woven from coarse sheep or even goat wool. The civilian version of the cloak, called lacerna, had a finer dressing. The shape of the penula resembled a half oval, the straight sides of which closed in front and were fastened with two pairs of buttons.

On some sculptural images, the incision is missing. In this case, the penula, like a modern poncho, had the shape of an oval with a central hole and was worn over the head. To protect against the weather, she was supplied with a deep hood. In a civilian lacerne, such a hood, as a rule, was attached. The length of the penula reached the knees. Being wide enough, it allowed the soldiers to freely operate with their hands without removing their cloak. On frescoes and color images, the military cloak is usually brown.

Kaligi

The soldier's shoes were heavy boots of the Kaliga. The shoe blank was cut from one piece of thick bovine leather. The toes in the shoe remained open, and the straps covering the sides of the foot and ankle were cut through, which provided good ventilation to the legs.

The sole consisted of 3 layers stitched with each other. For greater strength, it was nailed from below with iron nails. It took 80–90 nails to tamp one shoe, while the weight of a pair of caligas reached 1.3–1.5 kg. The nails on the sole were located in a certain pattern, reinforcing those parts of it that wore out more during the campaign.

According to the observations of modern reenactors, nailed shoes were worn well on dirt roads and in the field, but in the mountains and on the cobblestones of city streets they slid over stones. In addition, the nails on the sole gradually wore out and required constant replacement. One pair of caligas was enough for about 500-1000 km of the march, while every 100 km of the way, 10 percent of the nails had to be changed. Thus, in two or three weeks of march, the Roman legion lost about 10 thousand nails.

Belt

The belt was an important part of the men's clothing of the Romans. Boys wore a belt as a sign of coming of age. The military wore wide leather belts, which distinguished them from civilians. The belt was worn over the armor and richly decorated with bronze relief or engraved overlays. For a decorative effect, the lining was sometimes covered with silver and provided with enamel inserts.

Roman belts of the late 1st century BC - early 2nd century AD had a kind of apron of 4-8 belts, covered with bronze overlays and ending with terminal ornaments. Apparently, this detail performed a purely decorative function and was worn for the sake of the sound effect it created. A dagger was hung from the belt, sometimes a purse with small money. The Romans usually wore a sword on a shoulder harness.

Leggings

Leggings were part of the protective armor that covered the legs from the knee to the instep of the foot, that is, they covered that part of them that was not usually covered by a shield. Officers and centurions on the monuments of the 1st-2nd centuries were often depicted in greaves, the wearing of which was something like a symbol of their rank. Their greaves were decorated with chasing with the image of the head of Medusa in the knee part, the side surface was decorated with tufts of lightning and floral ornaments. On the contrary, ordinary soldiers were usually depicted without greaves at this time.

During the era of the Dacian Wars, greaves returned to military equipment to protect the legs of soldiers from the blows of the Dacian scythes. Although the soldiers in the reliefs of Trajan's Column do not wear greaves, they are present in the depictions of Trajan's Trophy at Adamclisi. Roman soldiers in reliefs wear one or two greaves. This detail of military equipment is also present in the sculptures and frescoes of a later period. Archaeological finds of leggings are simple iron plates 35 cm long, with a longitudinal stiffener, devoid of any decor. They cover the leg only up to the knee; perhaps a separate piece of armor was used to protect the knee itself. For fastening on the leg, the leggings are equipped with four pairs of rings through which a belt was passed.

Ancient Rome was one of greatest empires. An empire that conquered most of the then known world. This state had a huge impact on the entire further process of the development of civilization, and the perfection of some structures and organizations of this country has not been surpassed so far.

We can safely say that since its inception, the words Roman Empire and the concepts of "order", "organization", "discipline" have become synonymous. This fully applies to the ancient Roman army, the legionnaires, who inspired awe and respect for the barbarian peoples ...

A fully equipped and equipped fighter was armed with a sword (in Latin “gladius”), several darts (“plumbatae”) or spears (“pila”). For protection, the legionnaires used a large rectangular shield ("scutum"). The battle tactics of the ancient Roman army were quite simple - before the start of the battle, the enemy was thrown with spears and darts, after which hand-to-hand combat began. And it was in such hand-to-hand fights, in which the Romans preferred to fight in a very dense formation, consisting of several rows, where the back rows pressed against the front rows, simultaneously supporting and pushing forward, and the advantages of the legionnaires' sword appeared, i.e. gladius

gladius and spatha

The fact is that the gladius was an almost ideal weapon for working in close formation: the total length of the weapon (not exceeding 60 centimeters) did not require room for a swing, and the sharpening of the blade itself made it possible to inflict both chopping and stabbing blows (although preference was given to strong stabbing blows from behind the shield, which gave quite good protection). Also, the gladiuses had two more undoubted advantages: they were all of the same type (in modern terms - “serial”), so a legionnaire who lost his weapon in battle could use the weapon of a defeated comrade without any inconvenience. In addition, usually ancient Roman swords were made from fairly low-grade iron, so they were cheap to manufacture, which means that such weapons could be made in very large quantities, which in turn led to an increase in the regular army.

It is very interesting that, according to historians, the gladius is not originally a Roman invention and was most likely borrowed from the tribes that once conquered the Iberian Peninsula. Around the 3rd century BC, the ancient Romans borrowed from the barbarian tribes (presumably the Gauls or Celts) a straight short sword called Gladius Hispaniensis (i.e. "Spanish sword"). The very word gladius quite possibly comes from the Celtic “kladyos” (“sword”), although some experts believe that this term may also come from the Latin “clades” (“damage, wound”) or “gladii” (“stem” ). But, one way or another, it was the Romans who “immortalized” this short sword.

Gladius is a double-edged sword with a wedge-shaped tip, used for stabbing and cutting blows to the enemy. A strong hilt was a convex handle, in which there could be recesses for fingers. The strength of the sword was provided either by batch forging: joining together several steel strips with the help of blows, or by the diamond-shaped cross-section of the blade when made from one high-carbon steel billet. In the manufacture of batch forging, a channel descending down was located in the center of the sword.
Very often, the name of the owner was indicated on the swords, which was knocked out on the blade or applied by engraving.

Stab wounds had a great effect during battles because stab wounds, especially in the abdominal cavity, as a rule, were always fatal. But in some situations, cutting and chopping blows were inflicted with a gladius, as evidenced by Livy in the accounts of the Macedonian wars, which speaks of the frightened soldiers of Macedonia when they saw the chopped bodies of the soldiers.
Despite the main strategy of the infantrymen - to inflict stabbing blows to the stomach, during training they were aimed at obtaining any advantage in battle, not excluding the possibility of hitting the enemy below the level of the shields, damaging the kneecaps with slashing and cutting blows.

There are four types of gladius.

Spanish gladius

Used no later than 200 BC. before 20 BC The length of the blade is approximately 60-68 cm. The length of the sword is approximately 75-85 cm. The width of the sword is approximately 5 cm. It was the largest and heaviest of the gladiuses. The earliest and longest of the gladius, it had a pronounced leaf-like shape. The maximum weight was about 1 kg, the standard one weighed about 900 g with a wooden handle.

Gladius "Mainz"

Mainz was founded as a Roman permanent camp at Moguntiacum around 13 BC. This large camp provided a population base for the growing city around it. Sword-making probably began in the camp and continued in the city; for example, Gaius Gentlius Victor, a Legio XXII veteran, used his demobilization bonus to start a business as a gladiarius, arms maker and dealer. Swords made in Mainz were sold mainly to the north. The variation of the gladius "Mainz" was characterized by a small waist of the blade and a long tip. Blade length 50-55 cm. Sword length 65-70 cm. Blade width about 7 cm. Sword weight about 800 gr. (with wooden handle). The Mainz-type gladius was designed primarily for stabbing. As for the slasher, clumsily applied, it could even damage the blade.

Gladius Fulham

The sword that gave this type its name was excavated from the Thames near the town of Fulham and must therefore date from after the Roman occupation of Britain. This was after the invasion of Auliya Platia in 43 AD. It was used until the end of the same century. It is considered an intermediate link between the Mainz type and the Pompeii type. Some consider it a development of the Mainz type, or simply that type. The blade is slightly narrower than the Mainz type, the main difference being the triangular point. Blade length 50-55 cm. Sword length 65-70 cm. The width of the blade is approximately 6 cm. The weight of the sword is about 700g. (with wooden handle).

Gladius "Pompeii"

Named in modern times for Pompeii, a Roman city that lost many of its inhabitants - despite the efforts of the Roman fleet to evacuate people - which was destroyed by a volcanic eruption in 79 AD. Four examples of swords were found there. The sword has parallel blades and a triangular tip. It is the shortest of the gladiuses. It is worth noting that it is often confused with the spatha, which was a longer slashing weapon used by auxiliaries on horseback. Unlike its predecessor, it was much better suited for cutting with the enemy, while its penetrating ability during stabbing decreased. Over the years the Pompeii type has become longer and the later versions are referred to as semi-spaths. Blade length 45-50cm. The length of the sword is 60-65cm. The width of the blade is about 5 cm. The weight of the sword is about 700g. (with wooden handle).

By the third century, even the Pompeii-type gladius was not effective enough.
The tactics of the legions became more defensive than offensive, as in earlier centuries. There was an urgent need for longer swords suitable for single combat or fighting in relatively free formation. And then the Roman infantry armed with a cavalry sword, known as "spat".

A long sword invented by the Celts, but actively used by the Roman cavalry. Initially, the spata was created and used by the Celts as a sword for infantrymen, which had a rounded tip and was intended for inflicting chopping and cutting blows, but over time, appreciating the gladius tip, intended for stabbing blows, the Celts sharpened the spata, and the Roman horse warriors admired with this long sword, they took it into service. Due to the center of gravity shifted closer to the point, this sword was ideal for mounted battles.
The Roman spatha reached 2 kg in weight, the width of the blade varied from 4 to 5 centimeters, and the length was approximately from 60 to 80 centimeters. The handle of the Roman spatha was made in the same way as that of the gladius, made of wood and bone.
When the sword appeared in the Roman Empire, first the cavalry officers began to arm themselves with it, then the entire cavalry changed their weapons, they were followed by auxiliary detachments that did not have a formation and they participated in the battle more in a fragmented form, that is, the fight with them was divided into fights. Soon, the officers of the infantry units, appreciated this sword, over time, not only armed themselves with them, but also armed ordinary legionnaires. Of course, some legionnaires remained loyal to the gladius, but it soon completely faded into history, giving way to a more practical spatha.

Pugio

A dagger used by Roman soldiers as a personal weapon. It is believed that the pugio was intended as an auxiliary weapon, but the exact combat use remains unexplained. Attempts to identify the pugio as a utility knife are misguided because the blade shape is not suitable for this purpose. In any case, there were many knives of various shapes and sizes on the Roman military installations, in this regard, there was no need to use the pugio alone for universal purposes. Officials The Roman Empire wore richly decorated daggers while on duty at their workplaces. Some wore daggers discreetly, to protect against unforeseen circumstances. In general, this dagger served as a weapon of murder and suicide; for example, the conspirators who dealt the fatal blow to Julius Caesar used the pugio to do so.

The pugio was ultimately derived from the Spanish originals various types. However, by the early 1st century AD, replicas of this Roman dagger typically had a wide blade that could be leaf-shaped. There could also be an alternative shape of the blade with a narrowing to the tip of the wide blades of the tip from about half the length of the blade. Blades vary in size from 18 cm to 28 cm in length and 5 cm or more in width. The central rib ran the entire length of each side of the blade, either in the middle or forming an extension on both sides. The shank was wide and flat, the handle plates were riveted on it, as well as on the shoulders of the blade. The pommel was originally round, but by the beginning of the 1st century AD, it acquired a trapezoidal shape, often topped with three decorative rivets.

The pugio was fitted with its own scabbard. In the second quarter of the 1st century AD, three types of scabbards were used. All had four fastening rings and a bulbous extension to which a large rivet was attached. Judging by the samples of wearing examples that have survived to us, the two lower rings were not used to secure the scabbard. The first type was made from curved metal (usually iron) plates. These plates were located on the front and back sides of the scabbard and, as it were, sealed the wooden “lining”. The front part was usually richly decorated with brass or silver inlay, as well as red, yellow or green enamel. A sign of these scabbards was the free movement of ring pendants attached by riveted bifurcated fasteners. Modern reconstructions of these scabbards, which are made of copper plates fixed with rivets, are not correct, samples of this type have never been found. This common error occurs due to a misinterpretation of the line drawing in an archaeological report of the "A" iron scabbard type, which was only decorated with silver inlay and decorative rivets.
The second type of scabbard was made of wood, and also, presumably, covered with leather. Attached to the front of such scabbards metal plates(almost always iron). This plate was made quite even and richly decorated with inlaid silver (sometimes tin) and enamel. The hanging rings resembled small Roman military buckles and were hinged to the sides of the case. The third type (“frame type”) was made of iron and consisted of a pair of curved skids that went together and expanded at the lower end of the scabbard, forming a spherical end. The runners were connected by two horizontal stripes in the upper and middle parts of the scabbard.

gasta

The main type of infantry spear in ancient Rome, although at different times the name gasta denoted different types of spears, for example, the Roman poet Ennius, around the 3rd century BC, mentions gasta in his works as a designation for a throwing spear, which actually had time is a common value. Following the modern judgment of historians, it was initially customary to arm the legionnaires with heavy spears, which are now commonly referred to as just the same gasts. At a later time, heavy spears were replaced by lighter darts - pilums. Ghasts are divided into three types, each of which can be safely called a separate type of spear:
1. Heavy infantry spear, intended exclusively for close combat.
2. A shortened spear, which was used both as a melee weapon and as a throwing one.
3. A light dart designed exclusively for throwing.

Until the 3rd century BC, gasta was in service with heavy infantry soldiers who were on the front lines. These soldiers were called so, in honor of the spear with which they went into battle - hastati, although later the spear went out of general use, the soldiers continued to be called hastati. Despite the fact that ordinary soldiers were replaced with gasta by pilum, the heavy spear remained in service with the principles and triarii, but this also lasted until the beginning of the 1st century BC. There was light infantry (velites), which did not have a combat order, which was always armed with light throwing hasta (hasta velitaris).
The gasta was about 2 m long, of which the lion's share was taken by the shaft (a completely different ratio compared to the pilum), which was about 170 cm long, and was made mainly of ash. The tip was originally forged from bronze, but later bronze was replaced by iron (as in many other cases related to weapons in the ancient Roman army), the length of the tip averaged 30 cm. Senior soldier ranks: beneficiaries, frumentaries, speculators, often performing special assignments, had spears of a special form, emphasizing their status. The tips of their spears were decorated with iron rings. It is known that the Romans had a special military award - a gold or silver spear (hasta pura). In the era of the Empire, they were awarded, as a rule, to officers of the legions, starting with senior centurions.

Pilum

Polearms of the Roman legionnaires, a kind of dart, designed to be thrown from a short distance at the enemy. Its exact origin has not yet been clarified. Perhaps it was invented by the Latins, or perhaps borrowed from the Samnites or the Etruscans. Pilum gets its distribution in the republican army of Rome and is in service with legionnaires until the beginning of the 4th century AD. e. It is mainly used by infantrymen, and during the period of the existence of the Republican army (the end of the 6th century BC - 27 BC), it is used by a certain type of troops - lightly armed velites and heavy infantry hastai. Around 100 B.C. the general Marius introduces a pilum as part of the armament of each legionnaire.

Initially, it consists of a long iron tip, equal in length to the shaft. The shaft was half driven into the tip, and the total length was about 1.5–2 meters. The metal part was thin, up to 1 cm in diameter, 0.6-1 m long and with a serrated or pyramidal point. During the reign of Caesar various options of the original type - the tip either lengthened or shortened. Pilums were also divided into light (up to 2 kg) and heavy (up to 5 kg). Its main difference from the spear was the long iron part. This served to ensure that when it hit the enemy's shield, it could not be cut with a sword.

The tip of the pilum could be fastened with a tube at the end or a flat tongue, which was fastened to the shaft with 1-2 rivets. For many darts with a “tongue” along the edges of the flat part, the edges were bent and covered the shaft so that the tip fit better to it. A well-preserved pilum (about 80 BC) with the second option for attaching the tip was found in Valencia (Spain ) and in Oberraden (northern Germany). Thanks to these finds, it is confirmed that by the middle of the 1st century BC. the pilum becomes lighter. Earlier copies of it were found in northern Etruria, near Telamon. The tips of these samples were very short - only 25-30 cm in length. There were also pilums with a flat part 57-75 cm long. During the well-known military reforms of the commander Gaius Marius, he noticed that the spear did not always bend upon impact, and the enemy could pick it up and use it. To prevent this, one of the rivets is replaced by a wooden pin, which breaks on impact, and the sides of the tongue did not bend.

Heavy pilums have a shaft tapering towards the end, at the junction with the tip there is a round heavy counterweight, which should increase the impact force of the spear. This type of pilum is depicted in the relief of the Cancilleria in Rome, which shows the Praetorians armed with them.
Basically, the spear was intended for throwing at the enemy, as a stabbing weapon was used much less frequently. They threw it before the start of hand-to-hand combat at a distance of 7 to 25 meters, lighter samples - up to 65 meters. Even despite the fact that the pilum simply stuck in the enemy's shield, without causing significant damage to him, it made it difficult for the enemy to move in close combat. At the same time, the soft core of the point often bent, excluding the possibility of quickly pulling it out or cutting it. Using the shield after that became inconvenient and had to be discarded. If the shield remained in the hands of the enemy, the legionnaire who came to the rescue stepped on the shaft of the stuck pilum and pulled the enemy's shield down, forming a convenient gap for striking with a spear or sword. Heavy pilums could, with the force of impact, pierce not only the shield, but also the enemy in armor. This has been proven by modern tests. From a distance of 5 meters, a Roman pilum pierces a three-centimeter pine board and a two-centimeter layer of plywood.

Later, the pilum gives way to a lighter spiculum. But there is a possibility that these are different names for the same type of weapon. With the decline and collapse of the Roman Empire, regular infantry - legionnaires - disappear into the past, and with them the pilums disappear from the battlefield. The era of dominance on the battlefield of heavy cavalry and a long spear begins.

lancea

Spear of the Roman cavalry.

Josephus Flavius ​​mentions that the Roman cavalry defeated the Jewish one thanks to the long lances. Later, after the crisis of the 3rd century, new models of spears were introduced in the infantry, instead of pilums. Throwing spears of new types (which appeared after the reforms of Diocletian), according to Vegetius, are vertullum, spicullum and plumbata. The first two were 1-meter darts, and the plumbata was a 60-centimeter lead-weighted feathered dart.
Praetorians were supplemented by detachments of lanciarii (lanciarii) - spear bodyguards, similar units appeared in the legions to protect especially important persons. The lancea was a service weapon, but they did not use a spear indoors, and the lanziarii were not limited in the choice of additional weapons; during the collapse of the empire, such a guard was an attribute of any important commander or, less often, a senator.

Plumbat.

The first mention of combat use Plumbats date back to ancient Greece in which plumbats were used by warriors from around 500 BC, but the use of plumbats is best known in the late Roman and Byzantine armies.

In the description, Vegetia Plumbata is a long-range throwing weapon. The heavily armed warriors who served in the Roman legion, in addition to traditional equipment, were equipped with five plumbats, which they wore on the inside of the shield. Soldiers used plumbats as an offensive weapon during the first onslaught and as a defensive weapon during an enemy attack. Constant exercise allowed them to achieve such prowess with weapons that the enemy and their horses were struck down before it came to hand-to-hand combat, and even before they came within the flight range of a javelin or arrow. Thus, at the same time, the warriors on the battlefield combined the qualities of heavy infantry and shooters. The skirmishers, who fought in front of the formation at the beginning of the battle, also had plumbats in service. Departing with the beginning of hand-to-hand combat back under the cover of their own, they continued to fire at the enemy. Plumbats at the same time threw them along a high trajectory, over the heads of their front ones. Vegetius specifically stipulates the need to arm the triarii standing in the back rows of the formation with plumbats. He also recommended to his readers the use of plumbats in siege work, both in protecting walls from enemy attacks and in storming enemy fortifications.

The appearance of the plumbata is due to the development of the same tendency to increase the mass of the weapon to increase the energy of its throw. However, if the pilum, equipped with a lead sinker, could be thrown only 20 m, and at this distance it pierced through the shield and the shield-bearer hiding behind it, then lightened by reducing the size of the shaft and the massiveness of the iron part of the tip of the plumbate, it flew 50-60 m , which is comparable to the range of a light dart throw. The plumbatu is distinguished from the latter by its smaller size and a special throwing technique, in which the warrior took the shaft with his fingers by the tail section and threw it with a shoulder swing of his hand, like throwing a throwing club or club. At the same time, the shaft of the plumbate became an extension of the thrower's hand and increased the throw lever, and the lead sinker imparted additional kinetic energy to the projectile. Thus, with dimensions smaller than that of a dart, the plumbata received a larger initial supply of energy, which made it possible to throw it at a distance at least not inferior to the distance of throwing a dart. Moreover, if the dart at the end almost completely wasted the initial energy of the throw communicated to it and even when it hit the target could not cause any noticeable damage to it, then the plumbata, even at the maximum range of its flight, retained a supply of energy sufficient to hit the victim.

An important advantage of the opponents of the Romans was the possession of more long-range weapons, with which closely lined up legions could be shot from extreme distances. Damage such a bombardment was probably quite insignificant, and the effectiveness was achieved by weakening the enemy's stamina and his self-confidence. An adequate response from the Romans was the use of projectiles that had a greater distance than the enemy, the distance of the shot and the force of destruction. As noted earlier, the plumbata was thrown at a distance equal to the range of the dart. But if the dart at the maximum distance turned out to be completely powerless, then the plumbata, even at the end, retained enough energy to hit its victim and incapacitate it. In particular, this property of the plumbata is pointed out by Vegetius when he says that the Romans "wounded the enemies and their horses before it came to hand-to-hand combat, and even before they came within the flight range of a javelin or arrow."

The short shaft of the plumbat and the throwing technique, which did not require much space, allowed the rear ranks of the formation to fire at the enemy during hand-to-hand combat as well. In order not to hurt those in front, the shells were sent upwards at a high angle. Due to the high angle of incidence, the plumbat pierced the target from top to bottom, at an angle of 30 to 70 degrees, which made it possible to hit the head, neck and shoulders of a warrior hiding behind a shield. At a time when all the attention of the combatants was turned to the enemy, the shells falling from above were especially dangerous, because "they could not be seen or evaded."

During the African campaign of 530, a plumbat thrown by the spear-bearer of Belisarius John of Armenia pierced the helmet of the nephew of the Vandal king Gaiseric and inflicted a mortal wound on him, from which he soon died, and it was from the armor that the helmet was made of metal of the greatest thickness.