Again I visited expressive means. Alexander Pushkin - Again I visited: Verse

In 1835 Pushkin last time visited Mikhailovsky - at the funeral of his mother. In the same year, the poem "I visited again ..." was written - the poetic result of the poet's life.

Composition. The poem is divided into three parts: an arrival in Mikhailovskoye, a description of the nature of the region, an appeal to future generations. The poet depicts life in its constant change. He turns to the past, because the present reminds of the bygone years, and in the present itself, the sprouts of the future are already ripening. The entire artistic fabric of the work gives an idea of ​​the fleeting time, the change and continuity of generations.

This poem absorbs Pushkin's entire life experience. Here the poet raises the "eternal" Topics: life and death, connection between nature and man.

Ideological meaning the poem lies in the connection of man with nature, harmony with it, as well as in the connection of different generations, epochs of human life. Only those who can understand, realize and accept the harmony of nature, feel it, listen to its every rustle and sound, feel the music of nature, are able to answer for themselves the question of the meaning of human life, appreciate and love life.

In the finale, the lyrical hero welcomes new generations, which are personified by a young grove (“Hello, young, unfamiliar tribe!”). There is a slight sadness in his words:

...not me

I will see your mighty late age,

When you outgrow my friends

And you will cover their old head

From the eyes of a passerby.

But he accepts the continuity of generations, the perpetual movement and enrichment of human thought, because these are the laws of being:

But let my grandson

Hear your hello noise when,

Returning from a friendly conversation,

Full of cheerful and pleasant thoughts,

He will pass you by in the darkness of the night

And he will remember me.

The poem “I visited again” was written by Pushkin on the penultimate trip to Mikhailovskoye in his life, in September 1835. The next visit of the poet to the village was associated with a sad event - the funeral of his mother. And six months later, the coffin with the body of Pushkin himself was brought to the family estate to the place of the last shelter on the Holy Mountains.

The main theme of the poem

The poet was associated with Mikhailovsky childhood memories and two years of exile, from July 1825 to September 1827, which fell on the time of youth. Loneliness, removal from the usual way of life were painful for Pushkin, although they gave him invaluable experience in creativity, rethinking life attitudes, growing up, becoming a person.

A consolation in exile for Pushkin was his nanny, under whose "painstaking supervision" he felt loving, compassionate care. Now "the old woman is gone - I can't hear her heavy steps behind the wall." Memories of the years of exile, sadness from the loss loved one explains the motif of sadness that fills the first lines of the poem.

The work can be divided thematically into three parts. At the beginning, the poet indulges in memories of the past tense. He is sad about the nanny. He remembers how he “sat motionless and looked at the lake”, comparing it with south sea, where until recently I was so happy.

Seeing three pine trees by the road, he notices the changes that have taken place during the years of his absence - young trees grow in the shade of their crowns. The poet's thoughts return to today, the second part is dedicated to him. Today Pushkin is a father big family and this is good for him to know. In the composition of the three pines, he sees that one pine stands at a distance from the other two, young shoots do not grow around it. She is “like an old bachelor,” the poet notes.

The third movement is a hymn to new life. The poet is freed from sadness and welcomes "the young, unfamiliar tribe." The passage of time is accepted by him as a natural pattern of life. He accepts the changes that happen to him and to the world around him.

Structural analysis of the poem

The work is constructed as written down on paper at the moment when reflections arose. The feeling of immediacy of what is happening is served by ellipsis at the beginning and in other places of the text. As if the poet snatched a thought from a series of others and transferred it to paper. The lines do not rhyme, many words and images are close to colloquial forms. The use of the solemn manner of iambic pentameter speaks of the significance for the poet of the thoughts that sound in the work.

The sincerity and immediacy of the poetic narrative, which the poet wants to convey to the reader, requires a sparing use of epithets. There are few of them in the poem, but they are always applied to the place. The "dismal seine", which is controlled by a fisherman, creates an association with the image of the elder Charon, transporting the souls of the dead through Lethe. The "Green Family" tells the reader that the poet is thinking about his family here as well.

The poem "I visited again" is a kind of summing up the poet's life. But unlike the “ceremonial” “I erected a monument to myself”, here Pushkin evaluates his life not in terms of its significance for society. He believes in its value for relatives and hopes for a good memory of his grandson.

The poem "I visited again ..." was created during the last
th arrival of Pushkin in the village of Mikhailovskov. Here
the poet's childhood passed, he spent two years here
links.
The past year of 1834 was difficult for Pushkin: the tsar's conferment with the title of chamber junker, absurd and ridiculous at his age, debts and disorder of family affairs, a conflict with high society, which could not
to commend the poet for his superiority, and, finally, the shocking
poet's event: the police opened his letter to
wife. Now the poet understands freedom as personal
spiritual independence.
A trip for a month and a half to Mikhailovekoe at the beginning of September 1835 was for the poet an attempt to think over his life, a desire to break with the hustle and bustle of the capital, to settle in the countryside, to take care of the household. Despite the difficult period in his life, the poet finds the strength for optimism and understands that only communication with
nature. He even decides to settle in
Mikhailovsky. But this was not destined to come true -
in less than a year and a half Alexander Pushkin
Will die in a duel without realizing a dream:

return to Mikhailovekoe and spend the rest there
own life.
Let's start the analysis of the poem with its form. Push
kin turned here to blank verse, withstanding
classic iambic pentameter.
White non-rhyming iambic pentameter is perfect
conveys an intonation of elegiac meditation. Besides
the absence of rhyme shifts the center of gravity to
semantic and intonational role of rhythm and
the strikingness of each word - that's why it's interesting
pay attention to the means of poetic
strikingness.
With a sharp edge before the very first line, the poet, as it were,
lets the reader into the continuation of some of his
deep thoughts. Nearly everyone's choice
words are guessed or a special image, or the necessary
paint to the poet: for example, a diminutive form
the word corner expresses Pushkin's special closeness to
Mikhailovsky, the word exile accurately defines
position of the exiled poet.
In the expression "the past embraces me vividly"
also has a deep meaning: both-mlet means embracing
replete with memories. Past so
vividly appears in the memory of the poet, what he thinks
like it all happened just yesterday.
The author also uses colloquial vocabulary (evening,
tossing and turning, sat), and book words (embracing, canopy,
darkness), and Slavicisms (golden, brega, head, young),
but all this diverse vocabulary is organically fused
line into one whole. The poem can be found
interesting epithets: painstaking patrol, golden
fields, a gloomy comrade, a disgraced house.
54

The poet uses inversion (golden fields, 'pastures
green). Inversion is one way to slow down
reading, encouraging the reader to delve into the deep
the meaning of the text.
The author often uses the technique of transferring part of the phrase
PS from one line to another:
The corner of the earth where I spent
An exile for two years of inconspicuous ...
Such a transfer makes it possible to feel
us, how freely the poet's speech flows, not constrained
the framework of poetry.
The poem uses alliteration
nay, creeps), and hissing sounds (noise rustle
their tops ...) convey the noise and rustle of the branches in the "black
doy grove.
Different tense forms of verbs help
the author to convey the connection between the past, the present
and the future.
The poem is divided into three semantic parts:
brought to Mikhailovskoye, a description of nature,
schenie to descendants.
From thoughts of an unforgettable corner in which he
returned ten years later, Pushkin moves on to
thoughts about life in general and about future generations,
who are destined to perceive and feel all
The fullness of earthly existence.
The poem depicts real landscapes
Mikhailovsky - the poet's favorite places.
The first part is devoted to nostalgic
Minaniyam - the poet says that much has changed

changed and HE, “obedient to the general law”, changed
flinched too. "Common law" is eternal renewal
life. But the changes of the lyrical hero are explained
only by age. Attitudes and beliefs
to friends _ all this remained the same, and in this
convince the last lines of the exposition:
And it seems that the evening still wandered
I am in these groves.
In the second part of the poem, the lyrical hero
mentions the "disgraced house", Arina Rodionovna and
his two-year exile. The image of a nanny for Pushkin
has always been very expensive. The babysitter was not associated
only warm memories; the poet is always opposed
supplied her simple and whole nature, her people
new wisdom inner void secular people
society. Along with the memory of the nanny is introduced
Another important topic is the theme of memory- To this topic
the lyrical hero will return in the final when you-
strikes his hope that the grandson will certainly
will remember him.
Exactly And in detail Pushkin paints the landscape of Mihai-
lovskogo _ the same view that opens from
wooded hill on which he liked to sit, looking
to the lake. This landscape is very reminiscent of a painting from
poems "Village", Separate strokes
the poet recreated the poverty of the region: a miserable net of a fisherman,
a mill warped with time.
The central place is given to the description of three
canopy, around which sprawled young shoots.
It is felt that they are especially dear to the poet - joke
56

my peaks they once greeted
his. 3and the past years have been striking
changes:
... near the roots of their obsolete
(Where once everything was empty, bare)
Now the young grove has grown ...
Pushkin resorts to poetic comparisons and
metaphors. At the heart of the image is her lovely family, so
called the lyrical hero of the young growth. bushes
crowded together like children, and only a lone pine
damn the gloomy bachelor, deprived of offspring.
Nature is spiritualized. The image of a young green
groves personifies the movement of life, the eternal
innovation and, of course, the poet's faith in the future.
The poet sees immortality in the eternal change of matter. He
welcomes the young people who come to him for
shift. The thought of a grandson who will hear the greeting
the sound of the trees that were young during the life of the poet
growth, speaks of the triumph of life and the change of peace
leniya. This idea of ​​the eternal renewal of nature, the idea
immortality (the old is replaced by the new) - very
important philosophical thought of the poem.
And Pushkin welcomes new generations of aphori-
stylistic phrase: “Hello, young tribe, unknown
lumps! ". The poet's foresight is optimistic: his grandson
surrounded by friends, and his thoughts are cheerful and pleasant.
The poem "... Again I visited ..." is often called
they say a kind of farewell of Pushkin to his relatives
places and summarizing life results. But in it
there is no sadness - it has a belief that it is still possible to change for the better, and this gives the work
lightness, sublimity and romance.
We can say that in this wonderful style
creation contains all the most important motives
Pushkin's lyrics. Here and his love for everything
earthly, and light barking sadness from the fleeting consciousness
life, and wise faith in the change of generations,
which will always triumph over time,
destruction and decay.

"I visited again" Alexander Pushkin

… Again I visited
The corner of the earth where I spent
An exile for two years inconspicuous.
Ten years have passed since then - and many
Changed my life
And himself, obedient to the general law,
I have changed - but here again
The past embraces me alive,
And it seems that the evening still wandered
I am in these groves.
Here is a disgraced house,
Where I lived with my poor nanny.
Already the old woman is gone - already behind the wall
I do not hear her heavy steps,
Nor her painstaking watch.

Here is a wooded hill, over which often
I sat motionless - and looked
To the lake, remembering with sadness
Other shores, other waves...
Between the fields of gold and green pastures
It spreads blue widely;
Through its unknown waters
A fisherman swims and pulls along
Poor net. On the shores we will shed
Scattered villages - there behind them
The windmill crooked, the wings were forced
Tossing and turning in the wind...
On the border
Grandfather's possessions, on the spot
Where the road goes uphill
Pitted by rains, three pines
Standing - one at a distance, two others
Close to each other - here, when they are past
I rode in the moonlight
The familiar noise of the rustle of their peaks
Welcomed me. Down that road
Now I have gone, and in front of me
I saw them again. They're still the same
All the same, their familiar rustle -
But near the roots of their obsolete
(Where once everything was empty, bare)
Now the young grove has grown,
Green family; the bushes are crowding
Under their shadow, like children. And away
There is one gloomy comrade
Like an old bachelor, and around him
Everything is still empty.
hello tribe.
Young, unfamiliar! not me
I will see your mighty late age,
When you outgrow my friends
And you will cover their old head
From the eyes of a passerby. But let my grandson
Hear your hello noise when,
Returning from a friendly conversation,
Full of cheerful and pleasant thoughts,
He will pass you by in the darkness of the night
And he will remember me.

Analysis of Pushkin's poem "I visited again"

Alexander Pushkin has a lot of textbook works, one of which is the poem "I visited again ...". It is notable for the fact that for the poet it is a kind of summing up the results of life, the line beyond which he will have to make his final choice and decide what he really wants.

This work, consisting of three parts, was created in 1835 during the last visit of Alexander Pushkin to his small homeland - to the famous village of Mikhailovskoye, where the poet spent not only his entire childhood, but also two years of exile. Going to the family estate, Pushkin did not have a clear idea of ​​​​how exactly he would continue to live. However, a few months spent in the bosom of nature helped him make several important decisions for himself. One of them directly concerned creativity, to which the poet decided to devote all subsequent years of his life. Pushkin understood that his position at court was very unambiguous, since freedom-loving verses and sharp epigrams had already sufficiently shocked secular society and aroused the secret displeasure of the emperor. However, the tsar's revenge was very subtle and skillful, since shortly before his trip to Mikhailovskoye, he granted Pushkin the title of chamber junker, which is customary to honor 20-year-old boys. Taking such a gift as a mockery, the poet decided to leave for a family estate for a while in order to make a final decision on exactly how he should act.

The answers to the numerous questions that torment the poet lie in his poem “I visited again”. The first part of this work is devoted to nostalgic memories, in which it brings some regret that youth has passed, and it is time to sum up the first life results. In the second part, which is inspired by walks along Mikhailovsky, one can clearly catch the poet’s desire to settle in this God-forgotten corner, leaving forever elite with his intrigues and gossip. At the same time, the third part, beginning with the line "Hello, young, unfamiliar tribe!", is addressed to the descendants. The poet admires in advance that the future generation of people will surely be able to get rid of high-society snobbery, become better and cleaner, but the author is unlikely to be able to get to know its most prominent representatives.

In a sense, the final part of the poem "I visited again" turned out to be prophetic, since less than a year and a half later, Alexander Pushkin died in a duel, without realizing his dream to return to Mikhailovskoye again and spend the rest of his life on the estate. Therefore, this work is not only a summing up, but also a kind of farewell to his native places, where the poet will no longer have a chance to walk through the moonlit meadows, enjoying the impeccable beauty of Russian nature. However, the author still does not lose hope that he can break vicious circle secular society, pay off debts and become truly a free man who can live the way he wants to. The belief that it is still possible to change for the better fills literally every line of the poem “I visited again”, giving it a certain lightness, sublimity and romance. Despite a rather difficult period in the life of the poet, he finds the strength for optimism and rethinks the years he has lived, coming to the conclusion that only communication with nature can give him true peace. Throughout his life, he draws strength for creativity precisely in Mikhailovskoye, therefore he makes the final decision to settle in his "native land", which, unfortunately, will not be realized.

The poetry of A.S. Pushkin is poetry full of lively charms of poetry, good feelings and lofty thoughts.

In 1835, in the month of September, Pushkin wrote the poem "Again I visited ...". This work is a philosophical reasoning, an example of realistic lyrics.

The thirties of the nineteenth century are difficult years for the poet, but this is the heyday of his talent; the period that marks its entry into fundamentally new literary paths, "on which advanced Russian literature will eventually follow."

The place where the poem was written is Mikhailovskoye, where the poet returned after a long break. The reason for the trip was economic affairs, but real reason, probably was in another. The poet had a craving for solitude, there was a desire to see again "grandfather's possessions", "disgraced house", "wooded hill", places with which so much was associated ...

What preceded the appearance of the poetic work "Again I visited"? Letters to his wife and Nashchokin preceded, in which the poet spoke about his anxieties and experiences, about annoyances and sorrows. In a letter to his wife, Pushkin noted that he had not yet begun to write, although, “...Today the weather is cloudy. Autumn begins. Maybe I'll sit down."

A.S. Pushkin’s poem “I visited again ...” echoes the poems of E.A. Baratynsky “Desolation” (“I visited you, captivating canopy ...”, 1834), and “There is a sweet country, there is a corner on earth ...” 1832). And also with the elegy of V.A. Zhukovsky “Perishability”, in which there are such words: “And many, many years later, perhaps a passerby will stop here” 1816).

In the lyrical monologue “Again I visited ...” Pushkin tells us about the places dear to his heart, where he spent “two years of imperceptible exile” (we are talking about exile in Mikhailovskoye in 1824-1826), about the “poor nanny”, who is no longer . The poet tells us about the past, the present, opens the veil of the future. He notices the changes that have taken place around, he catches the changes in himself.

To create a poem-reflection, which is “I visited again”, the author resorts to a white, unrhymed pentameter (iambic pentameter), with its restrained solemn course, with its simplicity and unadornedness. The use of this kind of rhyme (or rather, the absence of it) is suitable for works whose subjects are about time and about oneself, about the past and the future, about life and death.

The poem can be divided into five parts. Parts begin (with the exception of the third) and end (with the exception of the second) with a semi-verse. These five parts are five interrelated themes. Let's call them:
- the return of the poet, Mikhailovsky groves;
- the memory of the nanny, her disgraced house;
- a hill and a lake, at the sight of which the poet recalls other shores, other waves;
- three pines, a young grove;
- the poet's appeal to the "tribe of the young, unfamiliar."

After analyzing the poem, we can say that in a broader sense it is divided into two enlarged parts: the first part is thoughts about the past, the second part is thoughts about the future.

What is this poem about? It is about fast-flowing time and about oneself, about the connection of the natural world with the human world, about life in its constant movement and death, about the change and continuity of generations.

What are the main motives of the poem?
The motive of the road (“I visited again”), memories (“the past embraces me vividly”), exile and sadness (“spent me as an exile”), the motive of change and loss (“I have changed”, “the old woman is gone”, “the mill is twisted” ), renewal and youth ("now the young grove has grown").

Disclosure of the plot in the lyrical monologue "I visited again" is achieved by showing two angles. The first is created by pictures of nature. Here is a hill, a lake, three pines, next to which it was once empty, bare, and now a young grove has grown.

The second angle is associated with the image of the lyrical hero, his thoughts, memories, experiences. This line determines the development of the lyrical theme creative work. The monologue of the lyrical hero begins the poem, with his lyrical appeal to the young tribe, and the work ends. As for the differences between the positions of the lyrical hero and the author (which are usually not directly associated), there are none in this poem. We can say that the author and the lyrical hero are one and the same person. Not without reason, the word "I" occurs eleven times in the verse.

The combination in “I visited again” these two angles - nature and man with his thoughts, reflections, allows us to determine the theme of the poem: “transfer” it from the category of lyrical to the category of philosophical (“young grove”, thanks to the personification, turns into a symbol of future generations, to which the speech of the poet is addressed).

At first, the lyrical hero plunges into memories of his past, of the old nanny. Iridescent pictures of nature, "other shores", "golden fields" are replaced by unsightly views of a twisted mill, a fisherman with a miserable net.

The story about three young pines, which began sadly, continues in more colorful shades: it was - “empty, bare”, now - “the young grove has grown”. And in the future, - "you will outgrow my acquaintances, And you will overshadow their old head." Such is the spiral of development, the immutable law of life. Time is unstoppable, life moves forward, one generation is replaced by another. “Now” and “later” are inseparable for the author: the grandson will remember his grandfather, who himself foresaw this memory.

In the philosophical reasoning “Again I visited ...”, the law of continuity of generations (the dialectical law of life), linking the past, present and future, is at the forefront. “The longevity of the tree marks here the vital connection between grandfather and grandson, who hear the welcoming noise of pines on the border of “grandfather's possessions”.

The ideological meaning of the work lies in the fact that man is a part of nature, man and nature are inseparable, and also in the constant connection of generations.

In a poem central theme is the theme of inexorably running time, the theme of the inevitable movement of life, inevitable changes. Time changes - the person and everything that surrounds him changes. The author, as if imperceptibly, but constantly keeps track of time: “I visited again”, “I spent two imperceptible years as an exile”, “ten years have passed since then”.

The themes of the past, present and future are consolidated in the final part of the work.

The genre of the poem "I visited again" is an elegy.

Artistic features of the poem, means of poetic expression
Reading this poem involves a special arrangement of pauses. The overall rhythmic pattern of the work is characterized by frequent hyphens and internal pauses. The five parts of the poem (five themes) are not the same in terms of the number of lines. Such specificity of the astrophic composition of the poem is a sign of the simplicity of the form.

The lyrical monologue begins with a shortened line, thereby giving the impression that some kind of conversation is continuing.

An increased number of transfers (three pine trees / Standing, looking / At the lake, on the border / of grandfather's possessions, my grandson / Will hear), an abundance of pauses, iambic pentameter, astronomical composition - all these means of poetic expression create a natural intonation of lively reflection, give a special sound to poems , full of deep poetry, despite the lack of rhyme.

Phonetic features
Remembering the nanny, the lyrical hero seems to hear the echo of “her heavy steps”, shuffling gait. There are alliterations for hissing and deaf:
“The old woman is already gone - already behind the wall
I do not hear her heavy steps .. "

Alliterations on "sh" and "x" - in other lines:
"The familiar noise of the rustle of their peaks ..."
“All the same rustle familiar to their ear ...”

Assonance (repetition of identically sounding vowels in adjacent words) - "I still wandered in the evening in these groves."

Means of expressiveness (epithets) - “golden fields”, “poor seine”, “two years of inconspicuous”, “her painstaking watch”, “disgraced house”.

Lexical features (Slavicisms) - "along the banks", "young", "head".

In the poem “I visited again ...”, the central theme, as already noted, is the theme of time ruthlessly running forward, it deprives a person of complete freedom. Only life itself is free. In this phase of his life, the poet was already convinced of the utopian nature of the concept of "absolute freedom". Perhaps that is why there is not a single interrogative sentence in the monologue.

Conclusion

"Again I visited ..." - an example of a realistic, philosophical lyrics poet. Pushkin always approached his work very carefully, he rejected everything that seemed to him private, concrete. He strove to make the work as philosophical as possible.

Analysis of the poem allows you to better understand the author's idea, the artistic principles of construction lyrical work, to comprehend the ways in which the poet resorted to convey to us the deep ideas of the verse.

During the life of the poet, the poem "I visited again" was not printed.