Gaussian rules. Reverse Gauss method

In this article, the method is considered as a method for solving systems of linear equations (SLAEs). The method is analytical, that is, it allows you to write a solution algorithm in general view, and then substitute values ​​from specific examples there. Unlike the matrix method or Cramer's formulas, when solving a system of linear equations using the Gauss method, you can also work with those that have an infinite number of solutions. Or they don't have it at all.

What does Gauss mean?

First, we need to write our system of equations in It looks like this. Take the system:

The coefficients are written in the form of a table, and the free terms are written in a separate column on the right. The column with free terms is separated for convenience. The matrix that includes this column is called extended.

Further, the main matrix with coefficients must be reduced to the upper triangular shape. This is the main point of solving the system by the Gauss method. Simply put, after certain manipulations, the matrix should look like this, so that there are only zeros in its lower left part:

Then, if you write the new matrix again as a system of equations, you will notice that the last row already contains the value of one of the roots, which is then substituted into the equation above, another root is found, and so on.

This description of the solution by the Gauss method in the most general outline. And what happens if suddenly the system does not have a solution? Or are there infinitely many of them? To answer these and many more questions, it is necessary to consider separately all the elements used in the solution by the Gauss method.

Matrices, their properties

There is no hidden meaning in the matrix. It's just a convenient way to record data for later operations. Even schoolchildren should not be afraid of them.

The matrix is ​​always rectangular, because it is more convenient. Even in the Gauss method, where everything boils down to building a triangular matrix, a rectangle appears in the entry, only with zeros in the place where there are no numbers. Zeros can be omitted, but they are implied.

The matrix has a size. Its “width” is the number of rows (m), “length” is the number of columns (n). Then the size of the matrix A (capital Latin letters are usually used to denote them) will be denoted as A m×n. If m=n, then this matrix is ​​square, and m=n is its order. Accordingly, any element of matrix A can be denoted by its row and column numbers: a xy ; x - row number, changes, y - column number, changes.

B is not the main point of the decision. In principle, all operations can be performed directly with the equations themselves, but the notation will be much more cumbersome, and it will be much easier to get confused in it.

Determinant

The matrix also has a determinant. This is a very important characteristic. There is no need to find out its meaning now; you can simply show how it is calculated, and then tell what properties of the matrix it determines. The easiest way to find the determinant is through diagonals. Imaginary diagonals are drawn in the matrix; the elements located on each of them are multiplied, and then the resulting products are added: diagonals with a slope to the right - with a plus sign, with a slope to the left - with a minus sign.

It is extremely important to note that the determinant can only be calculated for a square matrix. For a rectangular matrix, you can do the following: choose the smallest from the number of rows and the number of columns (let it be k), and then randomly mark k columns and k rows in the matrix. The elements at the intersection of the selected columns and rows will form a new square matrix. If the determinant of such a matrix is ​​a non-zero number, it is called the basis minor of the original rectangular matrix.

Before you start solving a system of equations using the Gaussian method, it doesn’t hurt to calculate the determinant. If it turns out to be zero, then we can immediately say that the matrix has either an infinite number of solutions or none at all. In such a sad case, you need to go further and find out about the rank of the matrix.

System classification

There is such a thing as the rank of a matrix. This is the maximum order of its non-zero determinant (if we remember about the basis minor, we can say that the rank of a matrix is ​​the order of the basis minor).

Based on the situation with rank, SLAE can be divided into:

• Joint. At In joint systems, the rank of the main matrix (consisting only of coefficients) coincides with the rank of the extended matrix (with a column of free terms). Such systems have a solution, but not necessarily one, therefore, additionally joint systems are divided into:
• - certain- having a unique solution. In certain systems, the rank of the matrix and the number of unknowns (or the number of columns, which is the same thing) are equal;
• - undefined - with an infinite number of solutions. The rank of matrices for such systems is less than the number of unknowns.
• Incompatible. At such systems, the ranks of the main and extended matrices do not coincide. Incompatible systems have no solution.

The Gauss method is good because during the solution it allows one to obtain either an unambiguous proof of the inconsistency of the system (without calculating the determinants of large matrices), or a solution in general form for a system with an infinite number of solutions.

Elementary transformations

Before proceeding directly to solving the system, you can make it less cumbersome and more convenient for calculations. This is achieved through elementary transformations - such that their implementation does not change the final answer in any way. It should be noted that some of the given elementary transformations are valid only for matrices, the source of which was the SLAE. Here is a list of these transformations:

1. Rearranging lines. Obviously, if you change the order of the equations in the system record, this will not affect the solution in any way. Consequently, rows in the matrix of this system can also be swapped, not forgetting, of course, the column of free terms.
2. Multiplying all elements of a string by some factor. Very helpful! It can be used to shorten big numbers in the matrix or remove zeros. The set of solutions, as usual, will not change, and it will become more convenient to perform further operations. The main thing is that the coefficient is not equal to zero.
3. Delete rows with proportional coefficients. This partly follows from the previous paragraph. If two or more rows in the matrix have proportional coefficients, then when multiplying / dividing one of the rows by the proportionality coefficient, two (or, again, more) absolutely identical rows are obtained, and you can remove the extra ones, leaving only one.
4. Removing a null line. If in the course of transformations a string is obtained somewhere in which all elements, including the free member, are zero, then such a string can be called zero and thrown out of the matrix.
5. Adding to the elements of one row the elements of another (in the corresponding columns), multiplied by a certain coefficient. The most unobvious and most important transformation of all. It is worth dwelling on it in more detail.

Adding a string multiplied by a factor

For ease of understanding, it is worth breaking down this process step by step. Two rows are taken from the matrix:

a 11 a 12 ... a 1n | b1

a 21 a 22 ... a 2n | b 2

Let's say you need to add the first to the second, multiplied by the coefficient "-2".

a" 21 = a 21 + -2×a 11

a" 22 = a 22 + -2×a 12

a" 2n = a 2n + -2×a 1n

Then the second row in the matrix is ​​replaced with a new one, and the first remains unchanged.

a 11 a 12 ... a 1n | b1

a" 21 a" 22 ... a" 2n | b 2

It should be noted that the multiplication coefficient can be selected in such a way that, as a result of adding two rows, one of the elements of the new row is equal to zero. Consequently, it is possible to obtain an equation in a system where there will be one less unknown. And if you get two such equations, then the operation can be done again and get an equation that will contain two fewer unknowns. And if each time you turn one coefficient of all rows that are below the original one to zero, then you can, like stairs, go down to the very bottom of the matrix and get an equation with one unknown. This is called solving the system using the Gaussian method.

In general

Let there be a system. It has m equations and n unknown roots. You can write it as follows:

The main matrix is ​​compiled from the system coefficients. A column of free terms is added to the extended matrix and, for convenience, separated by a line.

• the first row of the matrix is ​​multiplied by the coefficient k = (-a 21 /a 11);
• the first modified row and the second row of the matrix are added;
• instead of the second row, the result of the addition from the previous paragraph is inserted into the matrix;
• now the first coefficient in the new second row is a 11 × (-a 21 /a 11) + a 21 = -a 21 + a 21 = 0.

Now the same series of transformations is performed, only the first and third rows are involved. Accordingly, at each step of the algorithm, element a 21 is replaced by a 31. Then everything is repeated for a 41, ... a m1. The result is a matrix where the first element in the rows is zero. Now you need to forget about line number one and perform the same algorithm, starting from line two:

• coefficient k = (-a 32 /a 22);
• the second modified line is added to the “current” line;
• the result of the addition is substituted into the third, fourth, and so on lines, while the first and second remain unchanged;
• in the rows of the matrix the first two elements are already equal to zero.

The algorithm must be repeated until the coefficient k = (-a m,m-1 /a mm) appears. This means that in last time the algorithm was performed only for the lower equation. Now the matrix looks like a triangle, or has a stepped shape. In the bottom line there is the equality a mn × x n = b m. The coefficient and free term are known, and the root is expressed through them: x n = b m /a mn. The resulting root is substituted into the top line to find x n-1 = (b m-1 - a m-1,n ×(b m /a mn))÷a m-1,n-1. And so on by analogy: in each next line there is a new root, and, having reached the “top” of the system, you can find many solutions. It will be the only one.

When there are no solutions

If in one of the matrix rows all elements except the free term are equal to zero, then the equation corresponding to this row looks like 0 = b. It has no solution. And since such an equation is included in the system, then the set of solutions of the entire system is empty, that is, it is degenerate.

When there are an infinite number of solutions

It may happen that in the given triangular matrix there are no rows with one coefficient element of the equation and one free term. There are only lines that, when rewritten, would look like an equation with two or more variables. This means that the system has an infinite number of solutions. In this case, the answer can be given in the form of a general solution. How to do it?

All variables in the matrix are divided into basic and free. Basic ones are those that stand “on the edge” of the rows in the step matrix. The rest are free. In the general solution, the basic variables are written through free ones.

For convenience, the matrix is ​​first rewritten back into a system of equations. Then in the last of them, where exactly there is only one basic variable left, it remains on one side, and everything else is transferred to the other. This is done for every equation with one basic variable. Then, in the remaining equations, where possible, the expression obtained for it is substituted instead of the basic variable. If the result is again an expression containing only one basic variable, it is again expressed from there, and so on, until each basic variable is written as an expression with free variables. This is the general solution of SLAE.

You can also find the basic solution of the system - give the free variables any values, and then for this specific case calculate the values ​​of the basic variables. There are an infinite number of particular solutions that can be given.

Solution with specific examples

Here is a system of equations.

For convenience, it is better to immediately create its matrix

It is known that when solved by the Gaussian method, the equation corresponding to the first row will remain unchanged at the end of the transformations. Therefore, it will be more profitable if the upper left element of the matrix is ​​​​the smallest - then the first elements of the remaining rows after the operations will turn to zero. This means that in the compiled matrix it will be advantageous to put the second in place of the first row.

second line: k = (-a 21 / a 11) = (-3/1) = -3

a" 21 = a 21 + k×a 11 = 3 + (-3)×1 = 0

a" 22 = a 22 + k×a 12 = -1 + (-3)×2 = -7

a" 23 = a 23 + k×a 13 = 1 + (-3)×4 = -11

b" 2 = b 2 + k×b 1 = 12 + (-3)×12 = -24

third line: k = (-a 3 1 /a 11) = (-5/1) = -5

a" 3 1 = a 3 1 + k×a 11 = 5 + (-5)×1 = 0

a" 3 2 = a 3 2 + k×a 12 = 1 + (-5)×2 = -9

a" 3 3 = a 33 + k×a 13 = 2 + (-5)×4 = -18

b" 3 = b 3 + k×b 1 = 3 + (-5)×12 = -57

Now, in order not to get confused, it is necessary to write down the matrix with the intermediate results of the transformations.

It is obvious that such a matrix can be made more convenient for perception with the help of some operations. For example, you can remove all "minuses" from the second line by multiplying each element by "-1".

It is also worth noting that in the third line all elements are multiples of three. Then you can shorten the string by this number, multiplying each element by "-1/3" (minus - at the same time, to remove negative values).

Looks much nicer. Now we need to leave the first line alone and work with the second and third. The task is to add the second row to the third row, multiplied by such a coefficient that the element a 32 becomes equal to zero.

k = (-a 32 / a 22) = (-3/7) = -3/7 fractions, and only then, when the answers are received, decide whether to round up and translate into another form of notation)

a" 32 = a 32 + k×a 22 = 3 + (-3/7)×7 = 3 + (-3) = 0

a" 33 = a 33 + k×a 23 = 6 + (-3/7)×11 = -9/7

b" 3 = b 3 + k×b 2 = 19 + (-3/7)×24 = -61/7

The matrix is ​​written again with new values.

As you can see, the resulting matrix already has a stepped form. Therefore, further transformations of the system using the Gaussian method are not required. What can be done here is to remove the overall coefficient "-1/7" from the third line.

Now everything is beautiful. The point is small - write the matrix again in the form of a system of equations and calculate the roots

x + 2y + 4z = 12 (1)

7y + 11z = 24 (2)

The algorithm by which the roots will now be found is called the reverse move in the Gaussian method. Equation (3) contains the z value:

y = (24 - 11×(61/9))/7 = -65/9

And the first equation allows us to find x:

x = (12 - 4z - 2y)/1 = 12 - 4×(61/9) - 2×(-65/9) = -6/9 = -2/3

We have the right to call such a system joint, and even definite, that is, having a unique solution. The answer is written in the following form:

x 1 = -2/3, y = -65/9, z = 61/9.

An example of an uncertain system

The variant of solving a certain system using the Gauss method has been analyzed; now it is necessary to consider the case if the system is uncertain, that is, infinitely many solutions can be found for it.

x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 + x 5 = 7 (1)

3x 1 + 2x 2 + x 3 + x 4 - 3x 5 = -2 (2)

x 2 + 2x 3 + 2x 4 + 6x 5 = 23 (3)

5x 1 + 4x 2 + 3x 3 + 3x 4 - x 5 = 12 (4)

The very appearance of the system is already alarming, because the number of unknowns is n = 5, and the rank of the system matrix is ​​already exactly less than this number, because the number of rows is m = 4, that is highest order the squared determinant is 4. This means that there are solutions infinite set, and we need to look for its general appearance. The Gauss method for linear equations allows you to do this.

First, as usual, an extended matrix is ​​compiled.

Second line: coefficient k = (-a 21 /a 11) = -3. In the third line, the first element is before the transformations, so you don’t need to touch anything, you need to leave it as is. Fourth line: k = (-a 4 1 /a 11) = -5

By multiplying the elements of the first row by each of their coefficients in turn and adding them to the required rows, we obtain a matrix of the following form:

As you can see, the second, third and fourth rows consist of elements proportional to each other. The second and fourth are generally identical, so one of them can be removed immediately, and the remaining one can be multiplied by the coefficient “-1” and get line number 3. And again, out of two identical lines, leave one.

The result is a matrix like this. While the system has not yet been written down, it is necessary to determine the basic variables here - those standing at the coefficients a 11 = 1 and a 22 = 1, and free ones - all the rest.

The second equation has only one basic variable - x 2 . This means that it can be expressed from there by writing it through the variables x 3 , x 4 , x 5 , which are free.

We substitute the resulting expression into the first equation.

It turned out an equation in which the only basic variable is x 1. Let's do the same with it as with x 2 .

All basic variables, of which there are two, are expressed in terms of three free ones; now we can write the answer in general form.

You can also specify one of the particular solutions of the system. For such cases, zeros are usually chosen as values ​​for free variables. Then the answer will be:

16, 23, 0, 0, 0.

An example of a non-cooperative system

The solution of inconsistent systems of equations by the Gauss method is the fastest. It ends immediately as soon as at one of the stages an equation is obtained that has no solution. That is, the stage with the calculation of the roots, which is quite long and dreary, disappears. The following system is considered:

x + y - z = 0 (1)

2x - y - z = -2 (2)

4x + y - 3z = 5 (3)

As usual, the matrix is ​​​​compiled:

And it is reduced to a stepped form:

k 1 = -2k 2 = -4

After the first transformation, the third line contains an equation of the form

without a solution. Therefore, the system is inconsistent, and the answer is the empty set.

Advantages and disadvantages of the method

If you choose which method to solve SLAEs on paper with a pen, then the method that was discussed in this article looks the most attractive. It is much more difficult to get confused in elementary transformations than if you have to manually search for a determinant or some tricky inverse matrix. However, if you use programs for working with data of this type, for example, spreadsheets, then it turns out that such programs already contain algorithms for calculating the main parameters of matrices - determinant, minors, inverse, and so on. And if you are sure that the machine will calculate these values ​​​​itself and will not make mistakes, it is more advisable to use the matrix method or Cramer’s formulas, because their application begins and ends with the calculation of determinants and inverse matrices.

Application

Since the Gaussian solution is an algorithm, and the matrix is, in fact, a two-dimensional array, it can be used in programming. But since the article positions itself as a guide "for dummies", it should be said that the easiest place to put the method in is spreadsheets, for example, Excel. Again, any SLAE entered in a table in the form of a matrix will be considered by Excel as a two-dimensional array. And for operations with them, there are many nice commands: addition (you can only add matrices of the same size!), Multiplication by a number, matrix multiplication (also with certain restrictions), finding the inverse and transposed matrices and, most importantly, calculating the determinant. If this time-consuming task is replaced by a single command, it is much faster to determine the rank of a matrix and, therefore, to establish its compatibility or inconsistency.

The online calculator finds a solution to a system of linear equations (SLE) using the Gaussian method. Given detailed solution. To calculate, select the number of variables and the number of equations. Then enter the data into the cells and click on the "Calculate" button.

Number representation:

Number of places after decimal separator

×

Warning

Clear all cells?

Close Clear

Data entry instructions. Numbers are entered as integers (examples: 487, 5, -7623, etc.), decimals (ex. 67., 102.54, etc.) or fractions. The fraction must be typed in the form a/b, where a and b (b>0) are integer or decimal numbers. Examples 45/5, 6.6/76.4, -7/6.7, etc.

Gauss method

The Gauss method is a method of transition from the original system of linear equations (using equivalent transformations) to a system that is easier to solve than the original system.

Equivalent transformations of a system of linear equations are:

• swapping two equations in the system,
• multiplying any equation in the system by a non-zero real number,
• adding to one equation another equation multiplied by an arbitrary number.

Consider a system of linear equations:

Let us write system (1) in matrix form:

(3)

A- called the coefficient matrix of the system, b− right side of the restrictions, x− vector of variables to be found. Let rank( A)=p.

Equivalent transformations do not change the rank of the coefficient matrix and the rank of the extended matrix of the system. The set of solutions of the system also does not change under equivalent transformations. The essence of the Gauss method is to reduce the matrix of coefficients A to diagonal or stepped.

Let's build an extended matrix of the system:

At the next stage, we reset all elements of column 2, below the element. If this element is zero, then this row is swapped with the row lying below this row and having a non-zero element in the second column. Next, reset all elements of column 2 below the leading element a 22. To do this, add lines 3, ... m with string 2 multiplied by − a 32 /a 22 , ..., −a m2/ a 22, respectively. Continuing the procedure, we obtain a matrix of diagonal or stepped form. Let the resulting extended matrix have the form:

Because rangA=rang(A|b), then the set of solutions (7) is ( n−p)− variety. Hence n−p the unknowns can be chosen arbitrarily. The remaining unknowns from system (7) are calculated as follows. From the last equation we express x p through the remaining variables and insert into the previous expressions. Next, from the penultimate equation we express x p−1 through the remaining variables and insert into the previous expressions, etc. Consider the Gaussian method on specific examples.

Examples of solving a system of linear equations using the Gauss method

Example 1. Find a general solution to a system of linear equations using the Gauss method:

Let us denote by a ij elements i-th line and j th column.

a eleven . To do this, add lines 2,3 with line 1, multiplied by -2/3,-1/2, respectively:

Matrix recording type: Ax=b, Where

Let us denote by a ij elements i-th line and j th column.

Exclude the elements of the 1st column of the matrix below the element a eleven . To do this, add rows 2,3 with row 1, multiplied by -1/5, -6/5, respectively:

We divide each row of the matrix by the corresponding leading element (if the leading element exists):

Where x 3 , x

Substituting the upper expressions into the lower ones, we obtain the solution.

Then the vector solution can be represented as follows:

Where x 3 , x 4 are arbitrary real numbers.

We continue to consider systems of linear equations. This lesson is the third on the topic. If you have a vague idea of ​​what a system of linear equations is in general, if you feel like a teapot, then I recommend starting with the basics on the page Next, it is useful to study the lesson.

The Gaussian method is easy! Why? The famous German mathematician Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss, during his lifetime, received recognition as the greatest mathematician of all time, a genius, and even the nickname “King of Mathematics.” And everything ingenious, as you know, is simple! By the way, not only suckers get money, but also geniuses - Gauss’s portrait was on the 10 Deutschmark banknote (before the introduction of the euro), and Gauss still smiles mysteriously at Germans from ordinary postage stamps.

The Gauss method is simple in that the KNOWLEDGE OF A FIFTH-GRADE STUDENT IS ENOUGH to master it. You must know how to add and multiply! It is no coincidence that teachers often consider the method of sequential exclusion of unknowns in school mathematics electives. It’s a paradox, but students find the Gaussian method the most difficult. Nothing surprising - it’s all about the methodology, and I will try to talk about the algorithm of the method in an accessible form.

First, let's systematize a little knowledge about systems of linear equations. A system of linear equations can:

1) Have a unique solution. 2) Have infinitely many solutions. 3) Have no solutions (be non-joint).

The Gauss method is the most powerful and universal tool for finding a solution any systems of linear equations. As we remember, Cramer's rule and matrix method are unsuitable in cases where the system has infinitely many solutions or is inconsistent. A method sequential elimination unknown Anyway will lead us to the answer! In this lesson, we will again consider the Gauss method for case No. 1 (the only solution to the system), an article is devoted to the situations of points No. 2-3. I note that the algorithm of the method itself works the same in all three cases.

Let's return to the simplest system from the lesson How to solve a system of linear equations? and solve it using the Gaussian method.

The first step is to write down extended system matrix: . I think everyone can see by what principle the coefficients are written. The vertical line inside the matrix does not carry any mathematical meaning - it's just a strikethrough for ease of design.

Reference : I recommend you remember terms linear algebra. System Matrix is a matrix composed only of coefficients for unknowns, in this example, the matrix of the system: . Extended System Matrix – this is the same matrix of the system plus a column of free terms, in this case: . For brevity, any of the matrices can be simply called a matrix.

After the extended matrix of the system is written, it is necessary to perform some actions with it, which are also called elementary transformations.

The following elementary transformations exist:

1) Strings matrices Can rearrange in some places. For example, in the matrix under consideration, you can safely rearrange the first and second rows:

2) If the matrix has (or has appeared) proportional (like special case– identical) lines, then it follows delete All these rows are from the matrix except one. Consider, for example, the matrix . In this matrix, the last three rows are proportional, so it is enough to leave only one of them: .

3) If a zero row appears in the matrix during transformations, then it should also be delete. I won’t draw, of course, the zero line is the line in which all zeros.

4) The matrix row can be multiply (divide) to any number non-zero. Consider, for example, the matrix . Here it is advisable to divide the first line by –3, and multiply the second line by 2: . This action is very useful because it simplifies further transformations of the matrix.

5) This transformation causes the most difficulties, but in fact there is nothing complicated either. To a row of a matrix you can add another string multiplied by a number, different from zero. Consider our matrix of practical example: . First I'll describe the transformation in great detail. Multiply the first line by –2: , And to the second line we add the first line multiplied by –2: . Now the first line can be divided “back” by –2: . As you can see, the line that is ADDED LI – hasn't changed. Always the line TO WHICH IS ADDED changes UT.

In practice, of course, they don’t write it in such detail, but write it briefly: Once again: to the second line added the first line multiplied by –2. A line is usually multiplied orally or on a draft, with the mental calculation process going something like this:

“I rewrite the matrix and rewrite the first line: »

“First column. At the bottom I need to get zero. Therefore, I multiply the one at the top by –2: , and add the first one to the second line: 2 + (–2) = 0. I write the result in the second line: »

“Now the second column. At the top, I multiply -1 by -2: . I add the first to the second line: 1 + 2 = 3. I write the result in the second line: »

“And the third column. At the top I multiply -5 by -2: . I add the first to the second line: –7 + 10 = 3. I write the result in the second line: »

Please carefully understand this example and understand the sequential calculation algorithm, if you understand this, then the Gaussian method is practically in your pocket. But, of course, we will still work on this transformation.

Elementary transformations do not change the solution of the system of equations

! ATTENTION: considered manipulations can not use, if you are offered a task where the matrices are given “by themselves.” For example, with “classical” operations with matrices Under no circumstances should you rearrange anything inside the matrices! Let's return to our system. It is practically taken to pieces.

Let us write the augmented matrix of the system and, using elementary transformations, reduce it to stepped view:

(1) The first line was added to the second line, multiplied by –2. And again: why do we multiply the first line by –2? In order to get zero at the bottom, which means getting rid of one variable in the second line.

(2) Divide the second line by 3.

The purpose of elementary transformations – reduce the matrix to stepwise form: . In the design of the task, they directly draw out the “ladder” with a simple pencil, and also circle the numbers that are located on the “steps”. The term "stepped view" itself is not entirely theoretical; in the scientific and educational literature, it is often called trapezoidal view or triangular view.

As a result of elementary transformations, we obtained equivalent original system of equations:

Now the system needs to be "untwisted" in the opposite direction - from the bottom up, this process is called inverse of the Gaussian method.

In the lower equation we already have a ready-made result: .

Consider the first equation of the system and substitute the already known value of “y” into it:

Let us consider the most common situation, when the Gaussian method is required to solve a system of three linear equations with three unknowns.

Example 1

Solve the system of equations using the Gauss method:

Let's write the extended matrix of the system:

Now I will immediately draw the result that we will come to during the solution: And I repeat, our goal is to bring the matrix to a stepped form using elementary transformations. Where to start?

First, look at the top left number: Should almost always be here unit. Generally speaking, -1 (and sometimes other numbers) will also suit, but somehow it has traditionally happened that a unit is usually placed there. How to organize a unit? We look at the first column - we have a finished unit! Transformation one: swap the first and third lines:

Now the first line will remain unchanged until the end of the solution. Now fine.

The unit in the top left corner is organized. Now you need to get zeros in these places:

We get zeros using a “difficult” transformation. First we deal with the second line (2, –1, 3, 13). What needs to be done to get zero in the first position? Need to to the second line add the first line multiplied by –2. Mentally or on a draft, multiply the first line by –2: (–2, –4, 2, –18). And we consistently carry out (again mentally or on a draft) addition, to the second line we add the first line, already multiplied by –2:

We write the result in the second line:

We deal with the third line in the same way (3, 2, –5, –1). To get a zero in the first position, you need to the third line add the first line multiplied by –3. Mentally or on a draft, multiply the first line by –3: (–3, –6, 3, –27). AND to the third line we add the first line multiplied by –3:

We write the result in the third line:

In practice, these actions are usually performed orally and written down in one step:

No need to count everything at once and at the same time. The order of calculations and “writing in” the results consistent and usually it’s like this: first we rewrite the first line, and slowly puff on ourselves - CONSISTENTLY and ATTENTIVELY:
And I have already discussed the mental process of the calculations themselves above.

In this example, this is easy to do; we divide the second line by –5 (since all numbers there are divisible by 5 without a remainder). At the same time, we divide the third line by –2, because the smaller the numbers, the simpler the solution:

At the final stage of elementary transformations, you need to get another zero here:

For this to the third line we add the second line multiplied by –2:
Try to figure out this action yourself - mentally multiply the second line by –2 and perform the addition.

The last action performed is the hairstyle of the result, divide the third line by 3.

As a result of elementary transformations, an equivalent system of linear equations was obtained: Cool.

Now the reverse of the Gaussian method comes into play. The equations “unwind” from bottom to top.

In the third equation we already have a ready result:

Let's look at the second equation: . The meaning of "zet" is already known, thus:

And finally, the first equation: . “Igrek” and “zet” are known, it’s just a matter of little things:

Answer:

As has already been noted several times, for any system of equations it is possible and necessary to check the solution found, fortunately, this is easy and quick.

Example 2

This is an example for an independent solution, a sample of the final design and an answer at the end of the lesson.

It should be noted that your progress of the decision may not coincide with my decision process, and this is a feature of the Gauss method. But the answers must be the same!

Example 3

Solve a system of linear equations using the Gauss method

We look at the upper left “step”. We should have one there. The problem is that there are no units in the first column at all, so rearranging the rows will not solve anything. In such cases, the unit must be organized using an elementary transformation. This can usually be done in several ways. I did this: (1) To the first line we add the second line, multiplied by –1. That is, we mentally multiplied the second line by –1 and added the first and second lines, while the second line did not change.

Now at the top left there is “minus one”, which suits us quite well. Anyone who wants to get +1 can perform an additional movement: multiply the first line by –1 (change its sign).

(2) The first line multiplied by 5 was added to the second line. The first line multiplied by 3 was added to the third line.

(3) The first line was multiplied by –1, in principle, this is for beauty. The sign of the third line was also changed and it was moved to second place, so that on the second “step” we had the required unit.

(4) The second line was added to the third line, multiplied by 2.

(5) The third line was divided by 3.

A bad sign that indicates an error in calculations (more rarely, a typo) is a “bad” bottom line. That is, if we got something like , below, and, accordingly, , then with a high degree of probability we can say that an error was made during elementary transformations.

We charge the reverse, in the design of examples they often do not rewrite the system itself, but the equations are “taken directly from the given matrix.” The reverse stroke, I remind you, works from bottom to top. Yes, here is a gift:

Answer: .

Example 4

Solve a system of linear equations using the Gauss method

This is an example for you to solve on your own, it is somewhat more complicated. It's okay if someone gets confused. Full solution and sample design at the end of the lesson. Your solution may be different from my solution.

In the last part we will look at some features of the Gaussian algorithm. The first feature is that sometimes some variables are missing from the system equations, for example: How to correctly write the extended system matrix? I already talked about this point in class. Cramer's rule. Matrix method. In the extended matrix of the system, we put zeros in place of missing variables: By the way, this is a fairly easy example, since the first column already has one zero, and there are fewer elementary transformations to perform.

The second feature is this. In all the examples considered, we placed either –1 or +1 on the “steps”. Could there be other numbers there? In some cases they can. Consider the system: .

Here on the upper left “step” we have a two. But we notice the fact that all the numbers in the first column are divisible by 2 without a remainder - and the other is two and six. And the two at the top left will suit us! In the first step, you need to perform the following transformations: add the first line multiplied by –1 to the second line; to the third line add the first line multiplied by –3. This way we will get the required zeros in the first column.

Or another conventional example: . Here the three on the second “step” also suits us, since 12 (the place where we need to get zero) is divisible by 3 without a remainder. It is necessary to carry out the following transformation: add the second line to the third line, multiplied by –4, as a result of which the zero we need will be obtained.

Gauss's method is universal, but there is one peculiarity. You can confidently learn to solve systems using other methods (Cramer’s method, matrix method) literally the first time - they have a very strict algorithm. But in order to feel confident in the Gaussian method, you should “get your teeth into” and solve at least 5-10 ten systems. Therefore, at first there may be confusion and errors in calculations, and there is nothing unusual or tragic about this.

Rainy autumn weather outside the window.... Therefore, for everyone who wants a more complex example to solve on their own:

Example 5

Solve a system of 4 linear equations with four unknowns using the Gauss method.

Such a task is not so rare in practice. I think even a teapot who has thoroughly studied this page will understand the algorithm for solving such a system intuitively. Fundamentally, everything is the same - there are just more actions.

Cases when the system has no solutions (inconsistent) or has infinitely many solutions are discussed in the lesson Incompatible systems and systems with a common solution. There you can fix the considered algorithm of the Gaussian method.

I wish you success!

Solutions and answers:

Example 2: Solution : Let us write down the extended matrix of the system and, using elementary transformations, bring it to a stepwise form.
Elementary transformations performed: (1) The first line was added to the second line, multiplied by –2. The first line was added to the third line, multiplied by –1. Attention! Here you may be tempted to subtract the first from the third line; I highly recommend not subtracting it - the risk of error greatly increases. We just fold! (2) The sign of the second line was changed (multiplied by –1). The second and third lines have been swapped. note that on the “steps” we are satisfied not only with one, but also with -1, which is even more convenient. (3) The second line was added to the third line, multiplied by 5. (4) The sign of the second line was changed (multiplied by –1). The third line was divided by 14.

Reverse:

Answer : .

Example 4: Solution : Let us write down the extended matrix of the system and, using elementary transformations, bring it to a stepwise form:

Conversions performed: (1) A second line was added to the first line. Thus, the desired unit is organized on the upper left “step”. (2) The first line multiplied by 7 was added to the second line. The first line multiplied by 6 was added to the third line.

With the second “step” everything gets worse , the “candidates” for it are the numbers 17 and 23, and we need either one or –1. Transformations (3) and (4) will be aimed at obtaining the desired unit (3) The second line was added to the third line, multiplied by –1. (4) The third line was added to the second line, multiplied by –3. The required item on the second step has been received. . (5) The second line was added to the third line, multiplied by 6. (6) The second line was multiplied by –1, the third line was divided by -83.

Reverse:

Answer :

Example 5: Solution : Let us write down the matrix of the system and, using elementary transformations, bring it to a stepwise form:

Conversions performed: (1) The first and second lines have been swapped. (2) The first line was added to the second line, multiplied by –2. The first line was added to the third line, multiplied by –2. The first line was added to the fourth line, multiplied by –3. (3) The second line was added to the third line, multiplied by 4. The second line was added to the fourth line, multiplied by –1. (4) The sign of the second line was changed. The fourth line was divided by 3 and placed in place of the third line. (5) The third line was added to the fourth line, multiplied by –5.

Reverse:

Answer :

Educational institution "Belarusian State

Agricultural Academy"

Department higher mathematics

Guidelines

to study the topic “Gauss method for solving systems of linear

equations" by students of the accounting faculty of correspondence education (NISPO)

Gorki, 2013

Gauss method for solving systems of linear equations

Equivalent systems of equations

Two systems of linear equations are said to be equivalent if each solution of one of them is a solution of the other. The process of solving a system of linear equations consists of sequentially transforming it into an equivalent system using the so-called elementary transformations , which are:

1) rearrangement of any two equations of the system;

2) multiplying both sides of any equation of the system by a nonzero number;

3) adding to any equation another equation, multiplied by any number;

4) crossing out an equation consisting of zeros, i.e. equations of the form

Gaussian elimination

Consider the system m linear equations with n unknown:

The essence of the Gauss method or the method of successive exclusion of unknowns is as follows.

First, with the help of elementary transformations, the unknown is excluded from all equations of the system, except for the first one. Such system transformations are called Gaussian elimination step . The unknown is called enabling variable at the first step of transformation. The coefficient is called resolution factor , the first equation is called resolving equation , and the column of coefficients at permission column .

When performing a single Gaussian elimination step, the following rules must be used:

1) the coefficients and the free term of the resolving equation remain unchanged;

2) the coefficients of the resolving column, located below the resolving coefficient, turn to zero;

3) all other coefficients and free terms in the first step are calculated according to the rectangle rule:

, Where i=2,3,…,m; j=2,3,…,n.

We will perform similar transformations on the second equation of the system. This will lead to a system in which the unknown will be excluded in all equations, except for the first two. As a result of such transformations over each of the equations of the system (the direct course of the Gauss method), the original system is reduced to an equivalent step system of one of the following types.

Reverse Gaussian method

Step system

has a triangular appearance and that's it (i=1,2,…,n). Such a system has a unique solution. The unknowns are determined starting from the last equation (reverse of the Gauss method).

The step system has the form

where, i.e. the number of equations of the system is less than or equal to the number of unknowns. This system has no solutions, since the last equation will not hold for any values ​​of the variable .

Step type system

has countless solutions. From the last equation, the unknown is expressed through the unknowns . Then, instead of the unknown, its expression in terms of the unknowns is substituted into the penultimate equation . Continuing the reverse of the Gaussian method, the unknowns can be expressed in terms of unknowns . In this case, the unknowns are called free and can take any values, and unknown basic.

When solving systems in practice, it is convenient to perform all transformations not with a system of equations, but with an extended matrix of the system, consisting of coefficients for unknowns and a column of free terms.

Example 1. Solve system of equations

Solution. Let's create an extended matrix of the system and perform elementary transformations:

.

In the extended matrix of the system, the number 3 (it is highlighted) is the resolution coefficient, the first row is the resolution row, and the first column is the resolution column. When moving to the next matrix, the resolution row does not change; all elements of the resolution column below the resolution element are replaced by zeros. And all other elements of the matrix are recalculated according to the quadrilateral rule. Instead of element 4 in the second line we write , instead of element -3 in the second line it will be written etc. Thus, the second matrix will be obtained. The resolution element of this matrix will be the number 18 in the second row. To form the next (third matrix), we leave the second row unchanged, in the column under the resolving element we write zero and recalculate the remaining two elements: instead of the number 1 we write , and instead of the number 16 we write .

As a result, the original system was reduced to an equivalent system

From the third equation we find . Let's substitute this value into the second equation: y=3. Let’s substitute the found values ​​into the first equation y And z: , x=2.

Thus, the solution to this system of equations is x=2, y=3, .

Example 2. Solve system of equations

Solution. Let us perform elementary transformations on the extended matrix of the system:

In the second matrix, each element of the third row is divided by 2.

In the fourth matrix, each element of the third and fourth rows was divided by 11.

. The resulting matrix corresponds to the system of equations

Deciding this system, let's find , , .

Example 3. Solve system of equations

Solution. Let's write the extended matrix of the system and perform elementary transformations:

.

In the second matrix, each element of the second, third and fourth rows was divided by 7.

As a result, a system of equations was obtained

equivalent to the original one.

Since there are two fewer equations than unknowns, then from the second equation . Let's substitute the expression for into the first equation: , .

Thus, the formulas give a general solution to this system of equations. Unknowns are free and can take any value.

Let, for example, Then And . Solution is one of the particular solutions of the system, of which there are countless.

Questions for self-control of knowledge

1) What transformations of linear systems are called elementary?

2) What transformations of the system are called the Gaussian elimination step?

3) What is a resolving variable, resolving coefficient, resolving column?

4) What rules should be used when performing one step of Gaussian elimination?

One of the simplest ways to solve a system of linear equations is a technique based on the calculation of determinants ( Cramer's rule). Its advantage is that it allows you to immediately record the solution; it is especially convenient in cases where the coefficients of the system are not numbers, but some parameters. Its drawback is the cumbersomeness of calculations in the case of a large number of equations, moreover, Cramer's rule is not directly applicable to systems in which the number of equations does not coincide with the number of unknowns. In such cases, it is usually used Gaussian method.

Systems of linear equations having the same set of solutions are called equivalent. Obviously, many solutions linear system does not change if any equations are swapped, or if one of the equations is multiplied by some non-zero number, or if one equation is added to another.

Gauss method (method of sequential elimination of unknowns) is that with the help of elementary transformations the system is reduced to an equivalent system of a step type. First, using the 1st equation, we eliminate x 1 of all subsequent equations of the system. Then, using the 2nd equation, we eliminate x 2 from the 3rd and all subsequent equations. This process, called direct Gaussian method, continues until there is only one unknown left on the left side of the last equation x n. After this it is done inverse of the Gaussian method– solving the last equation, we find x n; after that, using this value, from the penultimate equation we calculate x n–1, etc. We find the last one x 1 from the first equation.

It is convenient to carry out Gaussian transformations by performing transformations not with the equations themselves, but with the matrices of their coefficients. Consider the matrix:

called extended matrix of the system, because, in addition to the main matrix of the system, it includes a column of free terms. The Gaussian method is based on reducing the main matrix of the system to a triangular form (or trapezoidal form in the case of non-square systems) using elementary row transformations (!) of the extended matrix of the system.

Example 5.1. Solve the system using the Gaussian method:

Solution. Let's write out the extended matrix of the system and, using the first row, after that we will reset the remaining elements:

we get zeros in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th rows of the first column:

Now we need all elements in the second column below the 2nd row to be equal to zero. To do this, you can multiply the second line by –4/7 and add it to the 3rd line. However, in order not to deal with fractions, let's create a unit in the 2nd row of the second column and only

Now, to get a triangular matrix, you need to reset the element of the fourth row of the 3rd column; to do this, you can multiply the third row by 8/54 and add it to the fourth. However, in order not to deal with fractions, we will swap the 3rd and 4th rows and the 3rd and 4th columns and only after that we will reset the specified element. Note that when rearranging the columns, the corresponding variables change places and this must be remembered; other elementary transformations with columns (addition and multiplication by a number) cannot be performed!

The last simplified matrix corresponds to a system of equations equivalent to the original one:

From here, using the inverse of the Gaussian method, we find from the fourth equation x 3 = –1; from the third x 4 = –2, from the second x 2 = 2 and from the first equation x 1 = 1. In matrix form, the answer is written as

We considered the case when the system is definite, i.e. when there is only one solution. Let's see what happens if the system is inconsistent or uncertain.

Example 5.2. Explore the system using the Gaussian method:

Solution. We write out and transform the extended matrix of the system

We write a simplified system of equations:

Here, in the last equation it turns out that 0=4, i.e. contradiction. Consequently, the system has no solution, i.e. she incompatible. à

Example 5.3. Explore and solve the system using the Gaussian method:

Solution. We write out and transform the extended matrix of the system:

As a result of the transformations, the last line contains only zeros. This means that the number of equations has decreased by one:

Thus, after simplifications, there are two equations left, and four unknowns, i.e. two unknown "extra". Let them be "superfluous", or, as they say, free variables, will x 3 and x 4 . Then

Believing x 3 = 2a And x 4 = b, we get x 2 = 1–a And x 1 = 2b–a; or in matrix form

A solution written in this way is called general, because, giving parameters a And b different meanings, it is possible to describe all possible solutions of the system. a